Cargando…
Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc
Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent global problem, which is often correlated with degenerative disc disease. The development and use of good, relevant animal models of the spine may improve treatment options for this condition. While no animal model is capable of reproducing the exact biolog...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5982393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30035038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2014.12.001 |
_version_ | 1783328231399620608 |
---|---|
author | Stolworthy, Dean K. Fullwood, R. Amy Merrell, Tyler M. Bridgewater, Laura C. Bowden, Anton E. |
author_facet | Stolworthy, Dean K. Fullwood, R. Amy Merrell, Tyler M. Bridgewater, Laura C. Bowden, Anton E. |
author_sort | Stolworthy, Dean K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent global problem, which is often correlated with degenerative disc disease. The development and use of good, relevant animal models of the spine may improve treatment options for this condition. While no animal model is capable of reproducing the exact biology, anatomy, and biomechanics of the human spine, the quality of a particular animal model increases with the number of shared characteristics that are relevant to the human condition. The purpose of this study was to investigate the camelid (specifically, alpaca and llama) cervical spine as a model of the human lumbar spine. Cervical spines were obtained from four alpacas and four llamas and individual segments were used for segmental flexibility/biomechanics and/or morphology/anatomy studies. Qualitative and quantitative data were compared for the alpaca and llama cervical spines, and human lumbar specimens in addition to other published large animal data. Results indicate that a camelid cervical intervertebral disc (IVD) closely approximates the human lumbar disc with regard to size, spinal posture, and biomechanical flexibility. Specifically, compared with the human lumbar disc, the alpaca and llama cervical disc size are approximately 62%, 83%, and 75% with regard to area, depth, and width, respectively, and the disc flexibility is approximately 133%, 173%, and 254%, with regard to range of motion (ROM) in axial-rotation, flexion-extension, and lateral-bending, respectively. These results, combined with the clinical report of disc degeneration in the llama lower cervical spine, suggest that the camelid cervical spine is potentially well suited for use as an animal model in biomechanical studies of the human lumbar spine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5982393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59823932018-07-20 Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc Stolworthy, Dean K. Fullwood, R. Amy Merrell, Tyler M. Bridgewater, Laura C. Bowden, Anton E. J Orthop Translat Original Article Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent global problem, which is often correlated with degenerative disc disease. The development and use of good, relevant animal models of the spine may improve treatment options for this condition. While no animal model is capable of reproducing the exact biology, anatomy, and biomechanics of the human spine, the quality of a particular animal model increases with the number of shared characteristics that are relevant to the human condition. The purpose of this study was to investigate the camelid (specifically, alpaca and llama) cervical spine as a model of the human lumbar spine. Cervical spines were obtained from four alpacas and four llamas and individual segments were used for segmental flexibility/biomechanics and/or morphology/anatomy studies. Qualitative and quantitative data were compared for the alpaca and llama cervical spines, and human lumbar specimens in addition to other published large animal data. Results indicate that a camelid cervical intervertebral disc (IVD) closely approximates the human lumbar disc with regard to size, spinal posture, and biomechanical flexibility. Specifically, compared with the human lumbar disc, the alpaca and llama cervical disc size are approximately 62%, 83%, and 75% with regard to area, depth, and width, respectively, and the disc flexibility is approximately 133%, 173%, and 254%, with regard to range of motion (ROM) in axial-rotation, flexion-extension, and lateral-bending, respectively. These results, combined with the clinical report of disc degeneration in the llama lower cervical spine, suggest that the camelid cervical spine is potentially well suited for use as an animal model in biomechanical studies of the human lumbar spine. Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5982393/ /pubmed/30035038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2014.12.001 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stolworthy, Dean K. Fullwood, R. Amy Merrell, Tyler M. Bridgewater, Laura C. Bowden, Anton E. Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc |
title | Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc |
title_full | Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc |
title_short | Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc |
title_sort | biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5982393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30035038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2014.12.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stolworthydeank biomechanicalanalysisofthecamelidcervicalintervertebraldisc AT fullwoodramy biomechanicalanalysisofthecamelidcervicalintervertebraldisc AT merrelltylerm biomechanicalanalysisofthecamelidcervicalintervertebraldisc AT bridgewaterlaurac biomechanicalanalysisofthecamelidcervicalintervertebraldisc AT bowdenantone biomechanicalanalysisofthecamelidcervicalintervertebraldisc |