Cargando…

Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc

Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent global problem, which is often correlated with degenerative disc disease. The development and use of good, relevant animal models of the spine may improve treatment options for this condition. While no animal model is capable of reproducing the exact biolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stolworthy, Dean K., Fullwood, R. Amy, Merrell, Tyler M., Bridgewater, Laura C., Bowden, Anton E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5982393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30035038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2014.12.001
_version_ 1783328231399620608
author Stolworthy, Dean K.
Fullwood, R. Amy
Merrell, Tyler M.
Bridgewater, Laura C.
Bowden, Anton E.
author_facet Stolworthy, Dean K.
Fullwood, R. Amy
Merrell, Tyler M.
Bridgewater, Laura C.
Bowden, Anton E.
author_sort Stolworthy, Dean K.
collection PubMed
description Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent global problem, which is often correlated with degenerative disc disease. The development and use of good, relevant animal models of the spine may improve treatment options for this condition. While no animal model is capable of reproducing the exact biology, anatomy, and biomechanics of the human spine, the quality of a particular animal model increases with the number of shared characteristics that are relevant to the human condition. The purpose of this study was to investigate the camelid (specifically, alpaca and llama) cervical spine as a model of the human lumbar spine. Cervical spines were obtained from four alpacas and four llamas and individual segments were used for segmental flexibility/biomechanics and/or morphology/anatomy studies. Qualitative and quantitative data were compared for the alpaca and llama cervical spines, and human lumbar specimens in addition to other published large animal data. Results indicate that a camelid cervical intervertebral disc (IVD) closely approximates the human lumbar disc with regard to size, spinal posture, and biomechanical flexibility. Specifically, compared with the human lumbar disc, the alpaca and llama cervical disc size are approximately 62%, 83%, and 75% with regard to area, depth, and width, respectively, and the disc flexibility is approximately 133%, 173%, and 254%, with regard to range of motion (ROM) in axial-rotation, flexion-extension, and lateral-bending, respectively. These results, combined with the clinical report of disc degeneration in the llama lower cervical spine, suggest that the camelid cervical spine is potentially well suited for use as an animal model in biomechanical studies of the human lumbar spine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5982393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59823932018-07-20 Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc Stolworthy, Dean K. Fullwood, R. Amy Merrell, Tyler M. Bridgewater, Laura C. Bowden, Anton E. J Orthop Translat Original Article Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent global problem, which is often correlated with degenerative disc disease. The development and use of good, relevant animal models of the spine may improve treatment options for this condition. While no animal model is capable of reproducing the exact biology, anatomy, and biomechanics of the human spine, the quality of a particular animal model increases with the number of shared characteristics that are relevant to the human condition. The purpose of this study was to investigate the camelid (specifically, alpaca and llama) cervical spine as a model of the human lumbar spine. Cervical spines were obtained from four alpacas and four llamas and individual segments were used for segmental flexibility/biomechanics and/or morphology/anatomy studies. Qualitative and quantitative data were compared for the alpaca and llama cervical spines, and human lumbar specimens in addition to other published large animal data. Results indicate that a camelid cervical intervertebral disc (IVD) closely approximates the human lumbar disc with regard to size, spinal posture, and biomechanical flexibility. Specifically, compared with the human lumbar disc, the alpaca and llama cervical disc size are approximately 62%, 83%, and 75% with regard to area, depth, and width, respectively, and the disc flexibility is approximately 133%, 173%, and 254%, with regard to range of motion (ROM) in axial-rotation, flexion-extension, and lateral-bending, respectively. These results, combined with the clinical report of disc degeneration in the llama lower cervical spine, suggest that the camelid cervical spine is potentially well suited for use as an animal model in biomechanical studies of the human lumbar spine. Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5982393/ /pubmed/30035038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2014.12.001 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Stolworthy, Dean K.
Fullwood, R. Amy
Merrell, Tyler M.
Bridgewater, Laura C.
Bowden, Anton E.
Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc
title Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc
title_full Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc
title_fullStr Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc
title_short Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc
title_sort biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5982393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30035038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2014.12.001
work_keys_str_mv AT stolworthydeank biomechanicalanalysisofthecamelidcervicalintervertebraldisc
AT fullwoodramy biomechanicalanalysisofthecamelidcervicalintervertebraldisc
AT merrelltylerm biomechanicalanalysisofthecamelidcervicalintervertebraldisc
AT bridgewaterlaurac biomechanicalanalysisofthecamelidcervicalintervertebraldisc
AT bowdenantone biomechanicalanalysisofthecamelidcervicalintervertebraldisc