Cargando…

Congenital Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Nature's Engineering Gone Wrong and Surgeon's Attempt to Rectify It

The C1-2 joint is unique and is responsible for more than 50% of the neck rotation. The joints have an ergonomic design that allows maximum motion without getting dislocated. It provides six degrees of freedom, the maximum being axial rotation, and is a marvel of nature's engineering. The morph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Salunke, Pravin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5982474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29899764
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPN.JPN_73_17
_version_ 1783328250245677056
author Salunke, Pravin
author_facet Salunke, Pravin
author_sort Salunke, Pravin
collection PubMed
description The C1-2 joint is unique and is responsible for more than 50% of the neck rotation. The joints have an ergonomic design that allows maximum motion without getting dislocated. It provides six degrees of freedom, the maximum being axial rotation, and is a marvel of nature's engineering. The morphometry of lateral masses of C1 and C2 joints was analyzed to explain the possible movements despite minor variations. The normal morphometry was compared with the joints of individuals with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation. The structural flaws were assessed to understand the forces leading to dislocation in various planes. The surgical correction of such flaws and engineering involved has been discussed. The joints of patients with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation are deformed and the lateral masses are trapezoidal as compared to the cuboidal lateral masses of normal individuals. The orientation of joints decides the direction and rate of slip of C1 over C2. Surgical correction of the joints is possible by drilling them, aiding in reduction, and preventing redislocation. The construct needs to be as close to the C1-2 joints as possible. Studying the engineering in naturally occurring joints gives us a chance to understand the dynamics of the abnormal ones. Correcting the deformed joints to near-normal ones makes realignment possible in all planes and helps in understanding the best construct to fuse them. Mimicking the naturally occurring joints can help us in developing prosthesis for C1-2 arthroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5982474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59824742018-06-13 Congenital Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Nature's Engineering Gone Wrong and Surgeon's Attempt to Rectify It Salunke, Pravin J Pediatr Neurosci Review Article The C1-2 joint is unique and is responsible for more than 50% of the neck rotation. The joints have an ergonomic design that allows maximum motion without getting dislocated. It provides six degrees of freedom, the maximum being axial rotation, and is a marvel of nature's engineering. The morphometry of lateral masses of C1 and C2 joints was analyzed to explain the possible movements despite minor variations. The normal morphometry was compared with the joints of individuals with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation. The structural flaws were assessed to understand the forces leading to dislocation in various planes. The surgical correction of such flaws and engineering involved has been discussed. The joints of patients with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation are deformed and the lateral masses are trapezoidal as compared to the cuboidal lateral masses of normal individuals. The orientation of joints decides the direction and rate of slip of C1 over C2. Surgical correction of the joints is possible by drilling them, aiding in reduction, and preventing redislocation. The construct needs to be as close to the C1-2 joints as possible. Studying the engineering in naturally occurring joints gives us a chance to understand the dynamics of the abnormal ones. Correcting the deformed joints to near-normal ones makes realignment possible in all planes and helps in understanding the best construct to fuse them. Mimicking the naturally occurring joints can help us in developing prosthesis for C1-2 arthroplasty. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5982474/ /pubmed/29899764 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPN.JPN_73_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Salunke, Pravin
Congenital Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Nature's Engineering Gone Wrong and Surgeon's Attempt to Rectify It
title Congenital Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Nature's Engineering Gone Wrong and Surgeon's Attempt to Rectify It
title_full Congenital Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Nature's Engineering Gone Wrong and Surgeon's Attempt to Rectify It
title_fullStr Congenital Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Nature's Engineering Gone Wrong and Surgeon's Attempt to Rectify It
title_full_unstemmed Congenital Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Nature's Engineering Gone Wrong and Surgeon's Attempt to Rectify It
title_short Congenital Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Nature's Engineering Gone Wrong and Surgeon's Attempt to Rectify It
title_sort congenital atlantoaxial dislocation: nature's engineering gone wrong and surgeon's attempt to rectify it
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5982474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29899764
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPN.JPN_73_17
work_keys_str_mv AT salunkepravin congenitalatlantoaxialdislocationnaturesengineeringgonewrongandsurgeonsattempttorectifyit