Cargando…
Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor: A Systematic Review
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of the physiological ICSI technique (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in the prognosis of couples with male factor, with respect to the following outcome measures: live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage rates. ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5982561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29672006 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20180027 |
_version_ | 1783328268189958144 |
---|---|
author | Avalos-Durán, Georgina Ángel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del Rivero-Murillo, Juana Zambrano-Guerrero, Jaime Enoc Carballo-Mondragón, Esperanza Checa-Vizcaíno, Miguel Ángel |
author_facet | Avalos-Durán, Georgina Ángel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del Rivero-Murillo, Juana Zambrano-Guerrero, Jaime Enoc Carballo-Mondragón, Esperanza Checa-Vizcaíno, Miguel Ángel |
author_sort | Avalos-Durán, Georgina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of the physiological ICSI technique (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in the prognosis of couples with male factor, with respect to the following outcome measures: live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage rates. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature, extracting raw data and performing data analysis. Patient(s): Couples with the male factor, who were subjected to in-vitro fertilization. Main Outcome Measures: rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage. RESULTS: In the systematic search, we found 2,918 studies and an additional study from other sources; only two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: There is no statistically significant difference between PICSI vs. ICSI, for any of the outcomes analyzed in this study. Enough information is still not available to prove the efficacy of the PICSI technique over ICSI in couples with male factor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5982561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59825612018-06-04 Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor: A Systematic Review Avalos-Durán, Georgina Ángel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del Rivero-Murillo, Juana Zambrano-Guerrero, Jaime Enoc Carballo-Mondragón, Esperanza Checa-Vizcaíno, Miguel Ángel JBRA Assist Reprod Review Article OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of the physiological ICSI technique (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in the prognosis of couples with male factor, with respect to the following outcome measures: live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage rates. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature, extracting raw data and performing data analysis. Patient(s): Couples with the male factor, who were subjected to in-vitro fertilization. Main Outcome Measures: rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage. RESULTS: In the systematic search, we found 2,918 studies and an additional study from other sources; only two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: There is no statistically significant difference between PICSI vs. ICSI, for any of the outcomes analyzed in this study. Enough information is still not available to prove the efficacy of the PICSI technique over ICSI in couples with male factor. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5982561/ /pubmed/29672006 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20180027 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Avalos-Durán, Georgina Ángel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del Rivero-Murillo, Juana Zambrano-Guerrero, Jaime Enoc Carballo-Mondragón, Esperanza Checa-Vizcaíno, Miguel Ángel Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor: A Systematic Review |
title | Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male
Factor: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male
Factor: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male
Factor: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male
Factor: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male
Factor: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | physiological icsi (picsi) vs. conventional icsi in couples with male
factor: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5982561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29672006 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20180027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT avalosdurangeorgina physiologicalicsipicsivsconventionalicsiincoupleswithmalefactorasystematicreview AT angelanamariaemiliacanedodel physiologicalicsipicsivsconventionalicsiincoupleswithmalefactorasystematicreview AT riveromurillojuana physiologicalicsipicsivsconventionalicsiincoupleswithmalefactorasystematicreview AT zambranoguerrerojaimeenoc physiologicalicsipicsivsconventionalicsiincoupleswithmalefactorasystematicreview AT carballomondragonesperanza physiologicalicsipicsivsconventionalicsiincoupleswithmalefactorasystematicreview AT checavizcainomiguelangel physiologicalicsipicsivsconventionalicsiincoupleswithmalefactorasystematicreview |