Cargando…

A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse

INTRODUCTION: We describe the formulation, development, and initial expert review of 3x3 Data Quality Assessment (DQA), a dynamic, evidence-based guideline to enable electronic health record (EHR) data quality assessment and reporting for clinical research. METHODS: 3x3 DQA was developed through the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiskopf, Nicole G., Bakken, Suzanne, Hripcsak, George, Weng, Chunhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881734
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/egems.218
_version_ 1783328359422361600
author Weiskopf, Nicole G.
Bakken, Suzanne
Hripcsak, George
Weng, Chunhua
author_facet Weiskopf, Nicole G.
Bakken, Suzanne
Hripcsak, George
Weng, Chunhua
author_sort Weiskopf, Nicole G.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We describe the formulation, development, and initial expert review of 3x3 Data Quality Assessment (DQA), a dynamic, evidence-based guideline to enable electronic health record (EHR) data quality assessment and reporting for clinical research. METHODS: 3x3 DQA was developed through the triangulation results from three studies: a review of the literature on EHR data quality assessment, a quantitative study of EHR data completeness, and a set of interviews with clinical researchers. Following initial development, the guideline was reviewed by a panel of EHR data quality experts. RESULTS: The guideline embraces the task-dependent nature of data quality and data quality assessment. The core framework includes three constructs of data quality: complete, correct, and current data. These constructs are operationalized according to the three primary dimensions of EHR data: patients, variables, and time. Each of the nine operationalized constructs maps to a methodological recommendation for EHR data quality assessment. The initial expert response to the framework was positive, but improvements are required. DISCUSSION: The initial version of 3x3 DQA promises to enable explicit guideline-based best practices for EHR data quality assessment and reporting. Future work will focus on increasing clarity on how and when 3x3 DQA should be used during the research process, improving the feasibility and ease-of-use of recommendation execution, and clarifying the process for users to determine which operationalized constructs and recommendations are relevant for a given dataset and study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5983018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59830182018-06-07 A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse Weiskopf, Nicole G. Bakken, Suzanne Hripcsak, George Weng, Chunhua EGEMS (Wash DC) Research INTRODUCTION: We describe the formulation, development, and initial expert review of 3x3 Data Quality Assessment (DQA), a dynamic, evidence-based guideline to enable electronic health record (EHR) data quality assessment and reporting for clinical research. METHODS: 3x3 DQA was developed through the triangulation results from three studies: a review of the literature on EHR data quality assessment, a quantitative study of EHR data completeness, and a set of interviews with clinical researchers. Following initial development, the guideline was reviewed by a panel of EHR data quality experts. RESULTS: The guideline embraces the task-dependent nature of data quality and data quality assessment. The core framework includes three constructs of data quality: complete, correct, and current data. These constructs are operationalized according to the three primary dimensions of EHR data: patients, variables, and time. Each of the nine operationalized constructs maps to a methodological recommendation for EHR data quality assessment. The initial expert response to the framework was positive, but improvements are required. DISCUSSION: The initial version of 3x3 DQA promises to enable explicit guideline-based best practices for EHR data quality assessment and reporting. Future work will focus on increasing clarity on how and when 3x3 DQA should be used during the research process, improving the feasibility and ease-of-use of recommendation execution, and clarifying the process for users to determine which operationalized constructs and recommendations are relevant for a given dataset and study. Ubiquity Press 2017-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5983018/ /pubmed/29881734 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/egems.218 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use and distribution, for non-commercial purposes, as long as the original material has not been modified, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Weiskopf, Nicole G.
Bakken, Suzanne
Hripcsak, George
Weng, Chunhua
A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse
title A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse
title_full A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse
title_fullStr A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse
title_full_unstemmed A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse
title_short A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse
title_sort data quality assessment guideline for electronic health record data reuse
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881734
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/egems.218
work_keys_str_mv AT weiskopfnicoleg adataqualityassessmentguidelineforelectronichealthrecorddatareuse
AT bakkensuzanne adataqualityassessmentguidelineforelectronichealthrecorddatareuse
AT hripcsakgeorge adataqualityassessmentguidelineforelectronichealthrecorddatareuse
AT wengchunhua adataqualityassessmentguidelineforelectronichealthrecorddatareuse
AT weiskopfnicoleg dataqualityassessmentguidelineforelectronichealthrecorddatareuse
AT bakkensuzanne dataqualityassessmentguidelineforelectronichealthrecorddatareuse
AT hripcsakgeorge dataqualityassessmentguidelineforelectronichealthrecorddatareuse
AT wengchunhua dataqualityassessmentguidelineforelectronichealthrecorddatareuse