Cargando…

Automating Electronic Clinical Data Capture for Quality Improvement and Research: The CERTAIN Validation Project of Real World Evidence

BACKGROUND: The availability of high fidelity electronic health record (EHR) data is a hallmark of the learning health care system. Washington State’s Surgical Care Outcomes and Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a network of hospitals participating in quality improvement (QI) registries wherein data are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devine, Emily Beth, Van Eaton, Erik, Zadworny, Megan E., Symons, Rebecca, Devlin, Allison, Yanez, David, Yetisgen, Meliha, Keyloun, Katelyn R., Capurro, Daniel, Alfonso-Cristancho, Rafael, Flum, David R., Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881766
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/egems.211
_version_ 1783328364755419136
author Devine, Emily Beth
Van Eaton, Erik
Zadworny, Megan E.
Symons, Rebecca
Devlin, Allison
Yanez, David
Yetisgen, Meliha
Keyloun, Katelyn R.
Capurro, Daniel
Alfonso-Cristancho, Rafael
Flum, David R.
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
author_facet Devine, Emily Beth
Van Eaton, Erik
Zadworny, Megan E.
Symons, Rebecca
Devlin, Allison
Yanez, David
Yetisgen, Meliha
Keyloun, Katelyn R.
Capurro, Daniel
Alfonso-Cristancho, Rafael
Flum, David R.
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
author_sort Devine, Emily Beth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The availability of high fidelity electronic health record (EHR) data is a hallmark of the learning health care system. Washington State’s Surgical Care Outcomes and Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a network of hospitals participating in quality improvement (QI) registries wherein data are manually abstracted from EHRs. To create the Comparative Effectiveness Research and Translation Network (CERTAIN), we semi-automated SCOAP data abstraction using a centralized federated data model, created a central data repository (CDR), and assessed whether these data could be used as real world evidence for QI and research. OBJECTIVES: Describe the validation processes and complexities involved and lessons learned. METHODS: Investigators installed a commercial CDR to retrieve and store data from disparate EHRs. Manual and automated abstraction systems were conducted in parallel (10/2012-7/2013) and validated in three phases using the EHR as the gold standard: 1) ingestion, 2) standardization, and 3) concordance of automated versus manually abstracted cases. Information retrieval statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Four unaffiliated health systems provided data. Between 6 and 15 percent of data elements were abstracted: 51 to 86 percent from structured data; the remainder using natural language processing (NLP). In phase 1, data ingestion from 12 out of 20 feeds reached 95 percent accuracy. In phase 2, 55 percent of structured data elements performed with 96 to 100 percent accuracy; NLP with 89 to 91 percent accuracy. In phase 3, concordance ranged from 69 to 89 percent. Information retrieval statistics were consistently above 90 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Semi-automated data abstraction may be useful, although raw data collected as a byproduct of health care delivery is not immediately available for use as real world evidence. New approaches to gathering and analyzing extant data are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5983060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59830602018-06-07 Automating Electronic Clinical Data Capture for Quality Improvement and Research: The CERTAIN Validation Project of Real World Evidence Devine, Emily Beth Van Eaton, Erik Zadworny, Megan E. Symons, Rebecca Devlin, Allison Yanez, David Yetisgen, Meliha Keyloun, Katelyn R. Capurro, Daniel Alfonso-Cristancho, Rafael Flum, David R. Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter EGEMS (Wash DC) Empirical Research BACKGROUND: The availability of high fidelity electronic health record (EHR) data is a hallmark of the learning health care system. Washington State’s Surgical Care Outcomes and Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a network of hospitals participating in quality improvement (QI) registries wherein data are manually abstracted from EHRs. To create the Comparative Effectiveness Research and Translation Network (CERTAIN), we semi-automated SCOAP data abstraction using a centralized federated data model, created a central data repository (CDR), and assessed whether these data could be used as real world evidence for QI and research. OBJECTIVES: Describe the validation processes and complexities involved and lessons learned. METHODS: Investigators installed a commercial CDR to retrieve and store data from disparate EHRs. Manual and automated abstraction systems were conducted in parallel (10/2012-7/2013) and validated in three phases using the EHR as the gold standard: 1) ingestion, 2) standardization, and 3) concordance of automated versus manually abstracted cases. Information retrieval statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Four unaffiliated health systems provided data. Between 6 and 15 percent of data elements were abstracted: 51 to 86 percent from structured data; the remainder using natural language processing (NLP). In phase 1, data ingestion from 12 out of 20 feeds reached 95 percent accuracy. In phase 2, 55 percent of structured data elements performed with 96 to 100 percent accuracy; NLP with 89 to 91 percent accuracy. In phase 3, concordance ranged from 69 to 89 percent. Information retrieval statistics were consistently above 90 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Semi-automated data abstraction may be useful, although raw data collected as a byproduct of health care delivery is not immediately available for use as real world evidence. New approaches to gathering and analyzing extant data are required. Ubiquity Press 2018-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5983060/ /pubmed/29881766 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/egems.211 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Empirical Research
Devine, Emily Beth
Van Eaton, Erik
Zadworny, Megan E.
Symons, Rebecca
Devlin, Allison
Yanez, David
Yetisgen, Meliha
Keyloun, Katelyn R.
Capurro, Daniel
Alfonso-Cristancho, Rafael
Flum, David R.
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
Automating Electronic Clinical Data Capture for Quality Improvement and Research: The CERTAIN Validation Project of Real World Evidence
title Automating Electronic Clinical Data Capture for Quality Improvement and Research: The CERTAIN Validation Project of Real World Evidence
title_full Automating Electronic Clinical Data Capture for Quality Improvement and Research: The CERTAIN Validation Project of Real World Evidence
title_fullStr Automating Electronic Clinical Data Capture for Quality Improvement and Research: The CERTAIN Validation Project of Real World Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Automating Electronic Clinical Data Capture for Quality Improvement and Research: The CERTAIN Validation Project of Real World Evidence
title_short Automating Electronic Clinical Data Capture for Quality Improvement and Research: The CERTAIN Validation Project of Real World Evidence
title_sort automating electronic clinical data capture for quality improvement and research: the certain validation project of real world evidence
topic Empirical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881766
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/egems.211
work_keys_str_mv AT devineemilybeth automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT vaneatonerik automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT zadwornymegane automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT symonsrebecca automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT devlinallison automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT yanezdavid automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT yetisgenmeliha automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT keylounkatelynr automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT capurrodaniel automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT alfonsocristanchorafael automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT flumdavidr automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence
AT tarczyhornochpeter automatingelectronicclinicaldatacaptureforqualityimprovementandresearchthecertainvalidationprojectofrealworldevidence