Cargando…

Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation

OBJECTIVE: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is becoming increasingly popular in noninvasive preoperative language mapping, as its results correlate well enough with those obtained by direct cortical stimulation (DCS) during awake surgery in adult patients with tumor. Reports in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehtinen, Henri, Mäkelä, Jyrki P., Mäkelä, Teemu, Lioumis, Pantelis, Metsähonkala, Liisa, Hokkanen, Laura, Wilenius, Juha, Gaily, Eija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12110
_version_ 1783328377134907392
author Lehtinen, Henri
Mäkelä, Jyrki P.
Mäkelä, Teemu
Lioumis, Pantelis
Metsähonkala, Liisa
Hokkanen, Laura
Wilenius, Juha
Gaily, Eija
author_facet Lehtinen, Henri
Mäkelä, Jyrki P.
Mäkelä, Teemu
Lioumis, Pantelis
Metsähonkala, Liisa
Hokkanen, Laura
Wilenius, Juha
Gaily, Eija
author_sort Lehtinen, Henri
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is becoming increasingly popular in noninvasive preoperative language mapping, as its results correlate well enough with those obtained by direct cortical stimulation (DCS) during awake surgery in adult patients with tumor. Reports in the context of epilepsy surgery or extraoperative DCS in adults are, however, sparse, and validation of nTMS with DCS in children is lacking. Furthermore, little is known about the risk of inducing epileptic seizures with nTMS in pediatric epilepsy patients. We provide the largest validation study to date in an epilepsy surgery population. METHODS: We compared language mapping with nTMS and extraoperative DCS in 20 epilepsy surgery patients (age range 9‐32 years; 14 children and adolescents). RESULTS: In comparison with DCS, sensitivity of nTMS was 68%, specificity 76%, positive predictive value 27%, and negative predictive value 95%. Age, location of ictal‐onset zone near or within DCS‐mapped language areas or severity of cognitive deficits had no significant effect on these values. None of our patients had seizures during nTMS. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study suggests that nTMS language mapping is clinically useful and safe in epilepsy surgery patients, including school‐aged children and patients with extensive cognitive dysfunction. Similar to in tumor surgery, mapping results in the frontal region are most reliable. False negative findings may be slightly more likely in epilepsy than in tumor surgery patients. Mapping results should always be verified by other methods in individual patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5983150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59831502018-06-07 Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation Lehtinen, Henri Mäkelä, Jyrki P. Mäkelä, Teemu Lioumis, Pantelis Metsähonkala, Liisa Hokkanen, Laura Wilenius, Juha Gaily, Eija Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is becoming increasingly popular in noninvasive preoperative language mapping, as its results correlate well enough with those obtained by direct cortical stimulation (DCS) during awake surgery in adult patients with tumor. Reports in the context of epilepsy surgery or extraoperative DCS in adults are, however, sparse, and validation of nTMS with DCS in children is lacking. Furthermore, little is known about the risk of inducing epileptic seizures with nTMS in pediatric epilepsy patients. We provide the largest validation study to date in an epilepsy surgery population. METHODS: We compared language mapping with nTMS and extraoperative DCS in 20 epilepsy surgery patients (age range 9‐32 years; 14 children and adolescents). RESULTS: In comparison with DCS, sensitivity of nTMS was 68%, specificity 76%, positive predictive value 27%, and negative predictive value 95%. Age, location of ictal‐onset zone near or within DCS‐mapped language areas or severity of cognitive deficits had no significant effect on these values. None of our patients had seizures during nTMS. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study suggests that nTMS language mapping is clinically useful and safe in epilepsy surgery patients, including school‐aged children and patients with extensive cognitive dysfunction. Similar to in tumor surgery, mapping results in the frontal region are most reliable. False negative findings may be slightly more likely in epilepsy than in tumor surgery patients. Mapping results should always be verified by other methods in individual patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5983150/ /pubmed/29881801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12110 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Lehtinen, Henri
Mäkelä, Jyrki P.
Mäkelä, Teemu
Lioumis, Pantelis
Metsähonkala, Liisa
Hokkanen, Laura
Wilenius, Juha
Gaily, Eija
Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation
title Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation
title_full Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation
title_fullStr Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation
title_short Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation
title_sort language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12110
work_keys_str_mv AT lehtinenhenri languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation
AT makelajyrkip languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation
AT makelateemu languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation
AT lioumispantelis languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation
AT metsahonkalaliisa languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation
AT hokkanenlaura languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation
AT wileniusjuha languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation
AT gailyeija languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation