Cargando…
Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation
OBJECTIVE: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is becoming increasingly popular in noninvasive preoperative language mapping, as its results correlate well enough with those obtained by direct cortical stimulation (DCS) during awake surgery in adult patients with tumor. Reports in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12110 |
_version_ | 1783328377134907392 |
---|---|
author | Lehtinen, Henri Mäkelä, Jyrki P. Mäkelä, Teemu Lioumis, Pantelis Metsähonkala, Liisa Hokkanen, Laura Wilenius, Juha Gaily, Eija |
author_facet | Lehtinen, Henri Mäkelä, Jyrki P. Mäkelä, Teemu Lioumis, Pantelis Metsähonkala, Liisa Hokkanen, Laura Wilenius, Juha Gaily, Eija |
author_sort | Lehtinen, Henri |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is becoming increasingly popular in noninvasive preoperative language mapping, as its results correlate well enough with those obtained by direct cortical stimulation (DCS) during awake surgery in adult patients with tumor. Reports in the context of epilepsy surgery or extraoperative DCS in adults are, however, sparse, and validation of nTMS with DCS in children is lacking. Furthermore, little is known about the risk of inducing epileptic seizures with nTMS in pediatric epilepsy patients. We provide the largest validation study to date in an epilepsy surgery population. METHODS: We compared language mapping with nTMS and extraoperative DCS in 20 epilepsy surgery patients (age range 9‐32 years; 14 children and adolescents). RESULTS: In comparison with DCS, sensitivity of nTMS was 68%, specificity 76%, positive predictive value 27%, and negative predictive value 95%. Age, location of ictal‐onset zone near or within DCS‐mapped language areas or severity of cognitive deficits had no significant effect on these values. None of our patients had seizures during nTMS. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study suggests that nTMS language mapping is clinically useful and safe in epilepsy surgery patients, including school‐aged children and patients with extensive cognitive dysfunction. Similar to in tumor surgery, mapping results in the frontal region are most reliable. False negative findings may be slightly more likely in epilepsy than in tumor surgery patients. Mapping results should always be verified by other methods in individual patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5983150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59831502018-06-07 Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation Lehtinen, Henri Mäkelä, Jyrki P. Mäkelä, Teemu Lioumis, Pantelis Metsähonkala, Liisa Hokkanen, Laura Wilenius, Juha Gaily, Eija Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is becoming increasingly popular in noninvasive preoperative language mapping, as its results correlate well enough with those obtained by direct cortical stimulation (DCS) during awake surgery in adult patients with tumor. Reports in the context of epilepsy surgery or extraoperative DCS in adults are, however, sparse, and validation of nTMS with DCS in children is lacking. Furthermore, little is known about the risk of inducing epileptic seizures with nTMS in pediatric epilepsy patients. We provide the largest validation study to date in an epilepsy surgery population. METHODS: We compared language mapping with nTMS and extraoperative DCS in 20 epilepsy surgery patients (age range 9‐32 years; 14 children and adolescents). RESULTS: In comparison with DCS, sensitivity of nTMS was 68%, specificity 76%, positive predictive value 27%, and negative predictive value 95%. Age, location of ictal‐onset zone near or within DCS‐mapped language areas or severity of cognitive deficits had no significant effect on these values. None of our patients had seizures during nTMS. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study suggests that nTMS language mapping is clinically useful and safe in epilepsy surgery patients, including school‐aged children and patients with extensive cognitive dysfunction. Similar to in tumor surgery, mapping results in the frontal region are most reliable. False negative findings may be slightly more likely in epilepsy than in tumor surgery patients. Mapping results should always be verified by other methods in individual patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5983150/ /pubmed/29881801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12110 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Full‐length Original Research Lehtinen, Henri Mäkelä, Jyrki P. Mäkelä, Teemu Lioumis, Pantelis Metsähonkala, Liisa Hokkanen, Laura Wilenius, Juha Gaily, Eija Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation |
title | Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation |
title_full | Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation |
title_fullStr | Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation |
title_short | Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: Comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation |
title_sort | language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation |
topic | Full‐length Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lehtinenhenri languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation AT makelajyrkip languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation AT makelateemu languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation AT lioumispantelis languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation AT metsahonkalaliisa languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation AT hokkanenlaura languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation AT wileniusjuha languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation AT gailyeija languagemappingwithnavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulationinpediatricandadultpatientsundergoingepilepsysurgerycomparisonwithextraoperativedirectcorticalstimulation |