Cargando…

Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: Socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies

Understanding human-wildlife conflict is an important first step in the conservation of highly endangered species that can have adverse effects on human communities, such as elephants. To gain insights into variables that shape attitudes toward elephant conservation in Asia, we surveyed 410 househol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Water, Antoinette, Matteson, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29856740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194736
_version_ 1783328431373549568
author van de Water, Antoinette
Matteson, Kevin
author_facet van de Water, Antoinette
Matteson, Kevin
author_sort van de Water, Antoinette
collection PubMed
description Understanding human-wildlife conflict is an important first step in the conservation of highly endangered species that can have adverse effects on human communities, such as elephants. To gain insights into variables that shape attitudes toward elephant conservation in Asia, we surveyed 410 households and 46 plantation owners in seven villages around the Salakpra Wildlife Sanctuary in western Thailand, an area of high human-elephant conflict. We sought to evaluate how past experiences with elephants (positive or negative), as well as socio-economic variables (age, income level, gender, and employment type) affect attitudes toward elephant conservation and coexistence in this area. In addition, we quantified deterrence methods currently used and identify potential mitigation strategies supported by community members. In general, less supportive attitudes toward elephant conservation and coexistence were held by individuals older than 35 years of age, those who had previously had experienced negative interactions with elephants, those with lower incomes, and those working in the agricultural sector. Conversely, those who had received benefits from living near elephants (e.g., supplemental income or feelings of pride from hosting volunteers or participating in conservation work) had more supportive views of elephant coexistence. Plantation owners reported using a variety of deterrence methods with varying success, with firecrackers being the most commonly utilized method. Community members identified several potentially beneficial mitigation strategies including forest restorations and patrol teams, adding water sources to wild elephant habitat, and education of local school and community groups. Overall, our results highlight the value of community members receiving benefits from living near elephants and suggest that special incentives may be needed for demographic groups disproportionately affected by elephants (e.g. those at lower income levels, those working in agriculture). A combination of these and other approaches will be required if human-elephant coexistence in western Thailand is to be realized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5983488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59834882018-06-17 Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: Socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies van de Water, Antoinette Matteson, Kevin PLoS One Research Article Understanding human-wildlife conflict is an important first step in the conservation of highly endangered species that can have adverse effects on human communities, such as elephants. To gain insights into variables that shape attitudes toward elephant conservation in Asia, we surveyed 410 households and 46 plantation owners in seven villages around the Salakpra Wildlife Sanctuary in western Thailand, an area of high human-elephant conflict. We sought to evaluate how past experiences with elephants (positive or negative), as well as socio-economic variables (age, income level, gender, and employment type) affect attitudes toward elephant conservation and coexistence in this area. In addition, we quantified deterrence methods currently used and identify potential mitigation strategies supported by community members. In general, less supportive attitudes toward elephant conservation and coexistence were held by individuals older than 35 years of age, those who had previously had experienced negative interactions with elephants, those with lower incomes, and those working in the agricultural sector. Conversely, those who had received benefits from living near elephants (e.g., supplemental income or feelings of pride from hosting volunteers or participating in conservation work) had more supportive views of elephant coexistence. Plantation owners reported using a variety of deterrence methods with varying success, with firecrackers being the most commonly utilized method. Community members identified several potentially beneficial mitigation strategies including forest restorations and patrol teams, adding water sources to wild elephant habitat, and education of local school and community groups. Overall, our results highlight the value of community members receiving benefits from living near elephants and suggest that special incentives may be needed for demographic groups disproportionately affected by elephants (e.g. those at lower income levels, those working in agriculture). A combination of these and other approaches will be required if human-elephant coexistence in western Thailand is to be realized. Public Library of Science 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5983488/ /pubmed/29856740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194736 Text en © 2018 van de Water, Matteson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van de Water, Antoinette
Matteson, Kevin
Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: Socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies
title Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: Socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies
title_full Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: Socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies
title_fullStr Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: Socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies
title_full_unstemmed Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: Socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies
title_short Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: Socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies
title_sort human-elephant conflict in western thailand: socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29856740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194736
work_keys_str_mv AT vandewaterantoinette humanelephantconflictinwesternthailandsocioeconomicdriversandpotentialmitigationstrategies
AT mattesonkevin humanelephantconflictinwesternthailandsocioeconomicdriversandpotentialmitigationstrategies