Cargando…
Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling
BACKGROUND: The use of clothing as a means of sun protection has been recommended in recent education campaigns. Contrary to popular opinion, however, some fabrics provide insufficient ultraviolet (UV) protection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 236 apparel textiles of the spring/summer collec...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11710968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-5945-1-6 |
_version_ | 1782120105506766848 |
---|---|
author | Gambichler, Thilo Rotterdam, Sebastian Altmeyer, Peter Hoffmann, Klaus |
author_facet | Gambichler, Thilo Rotterdam, Sebastian Altmeyer, Peter Hoffmann, Klaus |
author_sort | Gambichler, Thilo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of clothing as a means of sun protection has been recommended in recent education campaigns. Contrary to popular opinion, however, some fabrics provide insufficient ultraviolet (UV) protection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 236 apparel textiles of the spring/summer collections 2000 and 2001. In accordance with the forthcoming European standard the UV protection factor (UPF) of the fabrics was determined spectrophotometrically. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (33%) fabrics had UPF < 15, 45 (19%) had UPF = or > 15 and < 30, and 113 (48%) had UPF = or > 30 (30+). More than 70% of the wool, polyester, and fabric blends, and only less than 30% of the cotton, linen, and viscose fabrics had UPF values of 30+. Fabrics with black, navy-blue, white, green, or beige colours provided most frequently UPF values of 30+. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult for the sun-aware consumer to choose the 'right' garment, with a third of summer clothing providing insufficient UV protection and only half of the fabrics having UPF 30+, the UPF recommended by the European standard. Therefore, apparel summer fabrics should be measured and labelled in accordance with a standard document. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-59842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-598422001-11-16 Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling Gambichler, Thilo Rotterdam, Sebastian Altmeyer, Peter Hoffmann, Klaus BMC Dermatol Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of clothing as a means of sun protection has been recommended in recent education campaigns. Contrary to popular opinion, however, some fabrics provide insufficient ultraviolet (UV) protection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 236 apparel textiles of the spring/summer collections 2000 and 2001. In accordance with the forthcoming European standard the UV protection factor (UPF) of the fabrics was determined spectrophotometrically. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (33%) fabrics had UPF < 15, 45 (19%) had UPF = or > 15 and < 30, and 113 (48%) had UPF = or > 30 (30+). More than 70% of the wool, polyester, and fabric blends, and only less than 30% of the cotton, linen, and viscose fabrics had UPF values of 30+. Fabrics with black, navy-blue, white, green, or beige colours provided most frequently UPF values of 30+. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult for the sun-aware consumer to choose the 'right' garment, with a third of summer clothing providing insufficient UV protection and only half of the fabrics having UPF 30+, the UPF recommended by the European standard. Therefore, apparel summer fabrics should be measured and labelled in accordance with a standard document. BioMed Central 2001-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC59842/ /pubmed/11710968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-5945-1-6 Text en Copyright © 2001 Gambichler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gambichler, Thilo Rotterdam, Sebastian Altmeyer, Peter Hoffmann, Klaus Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling |
title | Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling |
title_full | Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling |
title_fullStr | Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling |
title_full_unstemmed | Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling |
title_short | Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling |
title_sort | protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11710968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-5945-1-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gambichlerthilo protectionagainstultravioletradiationbycommercialsummerclothingneedforstandardisedtestingandlabelling AT rotterdamsebastian protectionagainstultravioletradiationbycommercialsummerclothingneedforstandardisedtestingandlabelling AT altmeyerpeter protectionagainstultravioletradiationbycommercialsummerclothingneedforstandardisedtestingandlabelling AT hoffmannklaus protectionagainstultravioletradiationbycommercialsummerclothingneedforstandardisedtestingandlabelling |