Cargando…

Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling

BACKGROUND: The use of clothing as a means of sun protection has been recommended in recent education campaigns. Contrary to popular opinion, however, some fabrics provide insufficient ultraviolet (UV) protection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 236 apparel textiles of the spring/summer collec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gambichler, Thilo, Rotterdam, Sebastian, Altmeyer, Peter, Hoffmann, Klaus
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11710968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-5945-1-6
_version_ 1782120105506766848
author Gambichler, Thilo
Rotterdam, Sebastian
Altmeyer, Peter
Hoffmann, Klaus
author_facet Gambichler, Thilo
Rotterdam, Sebastian
Altmeyer, Peter
Hoffmann, Klaus
author_sort Gambichler, Thilo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of clothing as a means of sun protection has been recommended in recent education campaigns. Contrary to popular opinion, however, some fabrics provide insufficient ultraviolet (UV) protection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 236 apparel textiles of the spring/summer collections 2000 and 2001. In accordance with the forthcoming European standard the UV protection factor (UPF) of the fabrics was determined spectrophotometrically. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (33%) fabrics had UPF < 15, 45 (19%) had UPF = or > 15 and < 30, and 113 (48%) had UPF = or > 30 (30+). More than 70% of the wool, polyester, and fabric blends, and only less than 30% of the cotton, linen, and viscose fabrics had UPF values of 30+. Fabrics with black, navy-blue, white, green, or beige colours provided most frequently UPF values of 30+. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult for the sun-aware consumer to choose the 'right' garment, with a third of summer clothing providing insufficient UV protection and only half of the fabrics having UPF 30+, the UPF recommended by the European standard. Therefore, apparel summer fabrics should be measured and labelled in accordance with a standard document.
format Text
id pubmed-59842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-598422001-11-16 Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling Gambichler, Thilo Rotterdam, Sebastian Altmeyer, Peter Hoffmann, Klaus BMC Dermatol Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of clothing as a means of sun protection has been recommended in recent education campaigns. Contrary to popular opinion, however, some fabrics provide insufficient ultraviolet (UV) protection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 236 apparel textiles of the spring/summer collections 2000 and 2001. In accordance with the forthcoming European standard the UV protection factor (UPF) of the fabrics was determined spectrophotometrically. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (33%) fabrics had UPF < 15, 45 (19%) had UPF = or > 15 and < 30, and 113 (48%) had UPF = or > 30 (30+). More than 70% of the wool, polyester, and fabric blends, and only less than 30% of the cotton, linen, and viscose fabrics had UPF values of 30+. Fabrics with black, navy-blue, white, green, or beige colours provided most frequently UPF values of 30+. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult for the sun-aware consumer to choose the 'right' garment, with a third of summer clothing providing insufficient UV protection and only half of the fabrics having UPF 30+, the UPF recommended by the European standard. Therefore, apparel summer fabrics should be measured and labelled in accordance with a standard document. BioMed Central 2001-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC59842/ /pubmed/11710968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-5945-1-6 Text en Copyright © 2001 Gambichler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gambichler, Thilo
Rotterdam, Sebastian
Altmeyer, Peter
Hoffmann, Klaus
Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling
title Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling
title_full Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling
title_fullStr Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling
title_full_unstemmed Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling
title_short Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling
title_sort protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11710968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-5945-1-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gambichlerthilo protectionagainstultravioletradiationbycommercialsummerclothingneedforstandardisedtestingandlabelling
AT rotterdamsebastian protectionagainstultravioletradiationbycommercialsummerclothingneedforstandardisedtestingandlabelling
AT altmeyerpeter protectionagainstultravioletradiationbycommercialsummerclothingneedforstandardisedtestingandlabelling
AT hoffmannklaus protectionagainstultravioletradiationbycommercialsummerclothingneedforstandardisedtestingandlabelling