Cargando…

Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Evidence is lacking on the prognosis and prognostic factors of back-related leg pain and sciatica in patients seeing their primary care physicians. This evidence could guide timely appropriate treatment and referral decisions. PURPOSE: The present study aims to describe the progn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konstantinou, Kika, Dunn, Kate M., Ogollah, Reuben, Lewis, Martyn, van der Windt, Danielle, Hay, Elaine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29174459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.071
_version_ 1783328572947038208
author Konstantinou, Kika
Dunn, Kate M.
Ogollah, Reuben
Lewis, Martyn
van der Windt, Danielle
Hay, Elaine M.
author_facet Konstantinou, Kika
Dunn, Kate M.
Ogollah, Reuben
Lewis, Martyn
van der Windt, Danielle
Hay, Elaine M.
author_sort Konstantinou, Kika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Evidence is lacking on the prognosis and prognostic factors of back-related leg pain and sciatica in patients seeing their primary care physicians. This evidence could guide timely appropriate treatment and referral decisions. PURPOSE: The present study aims to describe the prognosis and prognostic factors in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain and sciatica. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The present study included adults visiting their family doctor with back-related leg pain in the United Kingdom. OUTCOME MEASURES: Information about pain, function, psychological, and clinical variables, was collected. Good outcome was defined as 30% or more reduction in disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire). METHODS: Participants completed the questionnaires, underwent clinical assessments, received a magnetic resonance imaging scan, and were followed-up 12 months later. Mixed-effects logistic regression evaluated the prognostic value of six a priori defined variable sets (leg pain duration, pain intensity, neuropathic pain, psychological factors, clinical examination, and imaging variables). A combined model, including variables from all models, examined independent effects. The National Institute for Health Research funded the study. There are no conflicts of interest. RESULTS: A total of 609 patients were included. At 12 months, 55% of patients improved in both the total sample and the sciatica group. For the whole cohort, longer leg pain duration (odds ratio [OR] 0.41; confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.90), higher identity score (OR 0.70; CI 0.53–0.93), and patient's belief that the problem will last a long time (OR 0.27; CI 0.13–0.57) were the strongest independent prognostic factors negatively associated with improvement. These last two factors were similarly negatively associated with improvement in the sciatica subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides new evidence on the prognosis and prognostic factors of back-related leg pain and sciatica in primary care. Just over half of patients improved at 12 months. Patient's belief of recovery timescale and number of other symptoms attributed to the pain are independent prognostic factors. These factors can be used to inform and direct decisions about timing and intensity of available therapeutic options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5984249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier Science Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59842492018-06-04 Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort Konstantinou, Kika Dunn, Kate M. Ogollah, Reuben Lewis, Martyn van der Windt, Danielle Hay, Elaine M. Spine J Article BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Evidence is lacking on the prognosis and prognostic factors of back-related leg pain and sciatica in patients seeing their primary care physicians. This evidence could guide timely appropriate treatment and referral decisions. PURPOSE: The present study aims to describe the prognosis and prognostic factors in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain and sciatica. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The present study included adults visiting their family doctor with back-related leg pain in the United Kingdom. OUTCOME MEASURES: Information about pain, function, psychological, and clinical variables, was collected. Good outcome was defined as 30% or more reduction in disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire). METHODS: Participants completed the questionnaires, underwent clinical assessments, received a magnetic resonance imaging scan, and were followed-up 12 months later. Mixed-effects logistic regression evaluated the prognostic value of six a priori defined variable sets (leg pain duration, pain intensity, neuropathic pain, psychological factors, clinical examination, and imaging variables). A combined model, including variables from all models, examined independent effects. The National Institute for Health Research funded the study. There are no conflicts of interest. RESULTS: A total of 609 patients were included. At 12 months, 55% of patients improved in both the total sample and the sciatica group. For the whole cohort, longer leg pain duration (odds ratio [OR] 0.41; confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.90), higher identity score (OR 0.70; CI 0.53–0.93), and patient's belief that the problem will last a long time (OR 0.27; CI 0.13–0.57) were the strongest independent prognostic factors negatively associated with improvement. These last two factors were similarly negatively associated with improvement in the sciatica subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides new evidence on the prognosis and prognostic factors of back-related leg pain and sciatica in primary care. Just over half of patients improved at 12 months. Patient's belief of recovery timescale and number of other symptoms attributed to the pain are independent prognostic factors. These factors can be used to inform and direct decisions about timing and intensity of available therapeutic options. Elsevier Science Inc 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5984249/ /pubmed/29174459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.071 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Konstantinou, Kika
Dunn, Kate M.
Ogollah, Reuben
Lewis, Martyn
van der Windt, Danielle
Hay, Elaine M.
Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort
title Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort
title_full Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort
title_fullStr Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort
title_short Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort
title_sort prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the atlas cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29174459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.071
work_keys_str_mv AT konstantinoukika prognosisofsciaticaandbackrelatedlegpaininprimarycaretheatlascohort
AT dunnkatem prognosisofsciaticaandbackrelatedlegpaininprimarycaretheatlascohort
AT ogollahreuben prognosisofsciaticaandbackrelatedlegpaininprimarycaretheatlascohort
AT lewismartyn prognosisofsciaticaandbackrelatedlegpaininprimarycaretheatlascohort
AT vanderwindtdanielle prognosisofsciaticaandbackrelatedlegpaininprimarycaretheatlascohort
AT hayelainem prognosisofsciaticaandbackrelatedlegpaininprimarycaretheatlascohort
AT prognosisofsciaticaandbackrelatedlegpaininprimarycaretheatlascohort