Cargando…

Wrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patients

BACKGROUND: The need for unobtrusive HR (heart rate) monitoring has led to the development of a new generation of strapless HR monitors. The aim of this study was to determine whether such an unobtrusive, wrist-worn optical HR monitor (OHRM) could be equivalent and therefore a valid alternative to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sartor, Francesco, Gelissen, Jos, van Dinther, Ralph, Roovers, David, Papini, Gabriele B., Coppola, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-018-0098-0
_version_ 1783328606640930816
author Sartor, Francesco
Gelissen, Jos
van Dinther, Ralph
Roovers, David
Papini, Gabriele B.
Coppola, Giuseppe
author_facet Sartor, Francesco
Gelissen, Jos
van Dinther, Ralph
Roovers, David
Papini, Gabriele B.
Coppola, Giuseppe
author_sort Sartor, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The need for unobtrusive HR (heart rate) monitoring has led to the development of a new generation of strapless HR monitors. The aim of this study was to determine whether such an unobtrusive, wrist-worn optical HR monitor (OHRM) could be equivalent and therefore a valid alternative to a traditional chest strap during a broad range of activities in a heterogeneous healthy population and coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine healthy volunteers, 84 males and 115 females, including 35 overweight-obese subjects, 53 pregnant women, and 20 CAD patients were tested in the present study. Second-by-second HR measured by the OHRM was concurrently evaluated against an ECG-based chest strap monitor during a broad range of activities (i.e., walking, running, cycling, gym, household, and sedentary activities). RESULTS: Data coverage, percentage of time the OHRM provides a HR not larger than 10 bpm from the reference, went from a minimum of 92% of the time in the least periodic activity (i.e., gym), to 95% during the most intense activity (i.e., running), and to a maximum of 98% for sedentary activities. The limits of agreement of the difference between the OHRM and the chest strap HR were within the range of ±15 bpm. The OHRM showed a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.98. Overall, the mean absolute error was not larger than 3 bpm, which can be considered clinically acceptable for a number of applications. A similar performance was found for CAD (94.2% coverage, 2.4 bpm error), but the small sample size does not allow any quantitative comparison. CONCLUSION: Heart rate measured by OHRM at the wrist and ECG-based HR measured via a traditional chest strap are acceptably close in a broad range of activities in a heterogeneous, healthy population, and showed initial promising results also in CAD patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13102-018-0098-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5984393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59843932018-06-07 Wrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patients Sartor, Francesco Gelissen, Jos van Dinther, Ralph Roovers, David Papini, Gabriele B. Coppola, Giuseppe BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: The need for unobtrusive HR (heart rate) monitoring has led to the development of a new generation of strapless HR monitors. The aim of this study was to determine whether such an unobtrusive, wrist-worn optical HR monitor (OHRM) could be equivalent and therefore a valid alternative to a traditional chest strap during a broad range of activities in a heterogeneous healthy population and coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine healthy volunteers, 84 males and 115 females, including 35 overweight-obese subjects, 53 pregnant women, and 20 CAD patients were tested in the present study. Second-by-second HR measured by the OHRM was concurrently evaluated against an ECG-based chest strap monitor during a broad range of activities (i.e., walking, running, cycling, gym, household, and sedentary activities). RESULTS: Data coverage, percentage of time the OHRM provides a HR not larger than 10 bpm from the reference, went from a minimum of 92% of the time in the least periodic activity (i.e., gym), to 95% during the most intense activity (i.e., running), and to a maximum of 98% for sedentary activities. The limits of agreement of the difference between the OHRM and the chest strap HR were within the range of ±15 bpm. The OHRM showed a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.98. Overall, the mean absolute error was not larger than 3 bpm, which can be considered clinically acceptable for a number of applications. A similar performance was found for CAD (94.2% coverage, 2.4 bpm error), but the small sample size does not allow any quantitative comparison. CONCLUSION: Heart rate measured by OHRM at the wrist and ECG-based HR measured via a traditional chest strap are acceptably close in a broad range of activities in a heterogeneous, healthy population, and showed initial promising results also in CAD patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13102-018-0098-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5984393/ /pubmed/29881626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-018-0098-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sartor, Francesco
Gelissen, Jos
van Dinther, Ralph
Roovers, David
Papini, Gabriele B.
Coppola, Giuseppe
Wrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patients
title Wrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patients
title_full Wrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patients
title_fullStr Wrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patients
title_full_unstemmed Wrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patients
title_short Wrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patients
title_sort wrist-worn optical and chest strap heart rate comparison in a heterogeneous sample of healthy individuals and in coronary artery disease patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-018-0098-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sartorfrancesco wristwornopticalandcheststrapheartratecomparisoninaheterogeneoussampleofhealthyindividualsandincoronaryarterydiseasepatients
AT gelissenjos wristwornopticalandcheststrapheartratecomparisoninaheterogeneoussampleofhealthyindividualsandincoronaryarterydiseasepatients
AT vandintherralph wristwornopticalandcheststrapheartratecomparisoninaheterogeneoussampleofhealthyindividualsandincoronaryarterydiseasepatients
AT rooversdavid wristwornopticalandcheststrapheartratecomparisoninaheterogeneoussampleofhealthyindividualsandincoronaryarterydiseasepatients
AT papinigabrieleb wristwornopticalandcheststrapheartratecomparisoninaheterogeneoussampleofhealthyindividualsandincoronaryarterydiseasepatients
AT coppolagiuseppe wristwornopticalandcheststrapheartratecomparisoninaheterogeneoussampleofhealthyindividualsandincoronaryarterydiseasepatients