Cargando…
How are evidence and knowledge used in orthopaedic decision-making? Three comparative case studies of different approaches to implementation of clinical guidance in practice
BACKGROUND: The uptake and use of clinical guidelines is often insufficient to change clinical behaviour and reduce variation in practice. As a consequence of diverse organisational contexts, the simple provision of guidelines cannot ensure fidelity or guarantee their use when making decisions. Impl...
Autores principales: | Grove, Amy, Clarke, Aileen, Currie, Graeme |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0771-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical guidance in elective orthopaedic surgery: a qualitative study protocol
por: Grove, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Paragons, Mavericks and Innovators—A typology of orthopaedic surgeons' professional identities. A comparative case study of evidence‐based practice
por: Grove, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Advancing clinical leadership to improve the implementation of evidence-based practice in surgery: a longitudinal mixed-method study protocol
por: Grove, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Orthopaedic decision making /
Publicado: (1984) -
Orthopaedic decision making /
Publicado: (1996)