Cargando…

A comparison of the effect of xinruibai versus filgrastim on hematopoietic reconstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND: To compare the effect of xinruibai (Pegfilgrastim) and filgrastim injections on white blood cell and platelet (PLT) recovery, adverse events, post-operative complications, and cost effectiveness after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: Children who u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Qixiang, Jiang, Hebi, Jiang, Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-018-0482-0
_version_ 1783328608770588672
author Ye, Qixiang
Jiang, Hebi
Jiang, Hua
author_facet Ye, Qixiang
Jiang, Hebi
Jiang, Hua
author_sort Ye, Qixiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the effect of xinruibai (Pegfilgrastim) and filgrastim injections on white blood cell and platelet (PLT) recovery, adverse events, post-operative complications, and cost effectiveness after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: Children who underwent allo-HSCT at our hospital from January 2014 to May 2017 due to thalassemia major, aplastic anemia, leukemia, and mucopolysaccharidosis were included. Among the children, 53 received xinruibai injections and 33 received filgrastim injections. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the average time to neutrophil and platelet recovery, the incidence of post-operative complications after allo-HSCT, the number of red blood cell and PLT infusions, or the incidence of adverse events related to the injection between two groups (P >  0.05). The pain score was 3.06 (SD 0.41) for the xinruibai group and 25.18 (SD 6.22) for the filgrastim group, indicating significant differences between the two groups (P <  0.001). No difference was found in the hospitalization cost. The cost of the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was 257.11 ± 61.87 Euro in the xinruibai group and 214.79 ± 0.00 Euro in the filgrastim group, showing significant difference (P <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Xinruibai injection was more convenient, simple, effective, and safer than filgrastim.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5984402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59844022018-06-07 A comparison of the effect of xinruibai versus filgrastim on hematopoietic reconstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Ye, Qixiang Jiang, Hebi Jiang, Hua Ital J Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: To compare the effect of xinruibai (Pegfilgrastim) and filgrastim injections on white blood cell and platelet (PLT) recovery, adverse events, post-operative complications, and cost effectiveness after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: Children who underwent allo-HSCT at our hospital from January 2014 to May 2017 due to thalassemia major, aplastic anemia, leukemia, and mucopolysaccharidosis were included. Among the children, 53 received xinruibai injections and 33 received filgrastim injections. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the average time to neutrophil and platelet recovery, the incidence of post-operative complications after allo-HSCT, the number of red blood cell and PLT infusions, or the incidence of adverse events related to the injection between two groups (P >  0.05). The pain score was 3.06 (SD 0.41) for the xinruibai group and 25.18 (SD 6.22) for the filgrastim group, indicating significant differences between the two groups (P <  0.001). No difference was found in the hospitalization cost. The cost of the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was 257.11 ± 61.87 Euro in the xinruibai group and 214.79 ± 0.00 Euro in the filgrastim group, showing significant difference (P <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Xinruibai injection was more convenient, simple, effective, and safer than filgrastim. BioMed Central 2018-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5984402/ /pubmed/29855330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-018-0482-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ye, Qixiang
Jiang, Hebi
Jiang, Hua
A comparison of the effect of xinruibai versus filgrastim on hematopoietic reconstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title A comparison of the effect of xinruibai versus filgrastim on hematopoietic reconstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_full A comparison of the effect of xinruibai versus filgrastim on hematopoietic reconstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_fullStr A comparison of the effect of xinruibai versus filgrastim on hematopoietic reconstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the effect of xinruibai versus filgrastim on hematopoietic reconstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_short A comparison of the effect of xinruibai versus filgrastim on hematopoietic reconstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_sort comparison of the effect of xinruibai versus filgrastim on hematopoietic reconstruction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-018-0482-0
work_keys_str_mv AT yeqixiang acomparisonoftheeffectofxinruibaiversusfilgrastimonhematopoieticreconstructionafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT jianghebi acomparisonoftheeffectofxinruibaiversusfilgrastimonhematopoieticreconstructionafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT jianghua acomparisonoftheeffectofxinruibaiversusfilgrastimonhematopoieticreconstructionafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT yeqixiang comparisonoftheeffectofxinruibaiversusfilgrastimonhematopoieticreconstructionafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT jianghebi comparisonoftheeffectofxinruibaiversusfilgrastimonhematopoieticreconstructionafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT jianghua comparisonoftheeffectofxinruibaiversusfilgrastimonhematopoieticreconstructionafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation