Cargando…
The characterisation of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy
BACKGROUND: Misreporting of energy intake is common and can contribute to biased estimates of the relationship between diet and disease. Energy intake misreporting is poorly understood in pregnancy and there is limited research assessing characteristics of women who misreport energy intake or change...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1826-x |
_version_ | 1783328655755182080 |
---|---|
author | Moran, L. J. McNaughton, S. A. Sui, Z. Cramp, C. Deussen, A. R. Grivell, R. M. Dodd, J. M. |
author_facet | Moran, L. J. McNaughton, S. A. Sui, Z. Cramp, C. Deussen, A. R. Grivell, R. M. Dodd, J. M. |
author_sort | Moran, L. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Misreporting of energy intake is common and can contribute to biased estimates of the relationship between diet and disease. Energy intake misreporting is poorly understood in pregnancy and there is limited research assessing characteristics of women who misreport energy intake or changes in misreporting of energy intake across pregnancy. METHODS: An observational study in n = 945 overweight or obese pregnant women receiving standard antenatal care who participated in the LIMIT randomised trial. Diet, physical activity, psychological factors, body image satisfaction and dieting behaviour were assessed at trial entry (10–20 weeks gestation) and 36 weeks gestation. Energy misreporting status was assessed through the ratio of daily energy intake over basal metabolic rate. Logistic regression analyses were conducted with the dependent variable of under reporting of energy intake at study entry or 36 weeks in separate analysis. RESULTS: At study entry and 36 weeks, women were classified as under reporters (38 vs 49.4%), adequate reporters (59.7 vs 49.8%) or over reporters of energy intake (2.3 vs 0.8%) respectively. The prevalence of under reporting energy intake at 36 weeks was higher than at study entry (early pregnancy). Body mass index (BMI) at study entry and 36 weeks and socioeconomic status, dieting behaviour and risk of depression at 36 weeks were independent predictors of under reporting of energy intake. CONCLUSIONS: Under reporting of energy intake was present in over a third of overweight and obese pregnant women and was higher in late compared to early pregnancy. Characteristics such as BMI, socioeconomic status, past dieting behaviour and risk of depression may aid in identifying women who either require support in accurate recording of food intake or attention for improving diet quality. Results were unable to distinguish whether under reporting reflects misreporting or a true restriction of dietary intake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12607000161426, registered 9/3/2007. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1826-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5984749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59847492018-06-07 The characterisation of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy Moran, L. J. McNaughton, S. A. Sui, Z. Cramp, C. Deussen, A. R. Grivell, R. M. Dodd, J. M. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Misreporting of energy intake is common and can contribute to biased estimates of the relationship between diet and disease. Energy intake misreporting is poorly understood in pregnancy and there is limited research assessing characteristics of women who misreport energy intake or changes in misreporting of energy intake across pregnancy. METHODS: An observational study in n = 945 overweight or obese pregnant women receiving standard antenatal care who participated in the LIMIT randomised trial. Diet, physical activity, psychological factors, body image satisfaction and dieting behaviour were assessed at trial entry (10–20 weeks gestation) and 36 weeks gestation. Energy misreporting status was assessed through the ratio of daily energy intake over basal metabolic rate. Logistic regression analyses were conducted with the dependent variable of under reporting of energy intake at study entry or 36 weeks in separate analysis. RESULTS: At study entry and 36 weeks, women were classified as under reporters (38 vs 49.4%), adequate reporters (59.7 vs 49.8%) or over reporters of energy intake (2.3 vs 0.8%) respectively. The prevalence of under reporting energy intake at 36 weeks was higher than at study entry (early pregnancy). Body mass index (BMI) at study entry and 36 weeks and socioeconomic status, dieting behaviour and risk of depression at 36 weeks were independent predictors of under reporting of energy intake. CONCLUSIONS: Under reporting of energy intake was present in over a third of overweight and obese pregnant women and was higher in late compared to early pregnancy. Characteristics such as BMI, socioeconomic status, past dieting behaviour and risk of depression may aid in identifying women who either require support in accurate recording of food intake or attention for improving diet quality. Results were unable to distinguish whether under reporting reflects misreporting or a true restriction of dietary intake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12607000161426, registered 9/3/2007. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1826-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5984749/ /pubmed/29859056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1826-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moran, L. J. McNaughton, S. A. Sui, Z. Cramp, C. Deussen, A. R. Grivell, R. M. Dodd, J. M. The characterisation of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy |
title | The characterisation of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy |
title_full | The characterisation of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy |
title_fullStr | The characterisation of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | The characterisation of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy |
title_short | The characterisation of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy |
title_sort | characterisation of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1826-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moranlj thecharacterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT mcnaughtonsa thecharacterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT suiz thecharacterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT crampc thecharacterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT deussenar thecharacterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT grivellrm thecharacterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT doddjm thecharacterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT moranlj characterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT mcnaughtonsa characterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT suiz characterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT crampc characterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT deussenar characterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT grivellrm characterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy AT doddjm characterisationofoverweightandobesewomenwhoareunderreportingenergyintakeduringpregnancy |