Cargando…

Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: The current seventh edition of the TNM classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) includes tumor number, vascular invasion, lymph node involvement but no longer the tumor size as compared to the sixth edition. The impact of the seventh edition on stage-based prognostic pred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juntermanns, Benjamin, Kaiser, Gernot Maximilian, Orth, Lena, Reis, Henning, Jaradat, Derar, Sydor, Svenja, Buechter, Matthias, Kasper, Stefan, Mathé, Zoltan, Sotiropoulos, Georgios Charalambos, Baba, Hideo Andreas, Canbay, Ali, Paul, Andreas, Fingas, Christian Dominik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0329-6
_version_ 1783328665211240448
author Juntermanns, Benjamin
Kaiser, Gernot Maximilian
Orth, Lena
Reis, Henning
Jaradat, Derar
Sydor, Svenja
Buechter, Matthias
Kasper, Stefan
Mathé, Zoltan
Sotiropoulos, Georgios Charalambos
Baba, Hideo Andreas
Canbay, Ali
Paul, Andreas
Fingas, Christian Dominik
author_facet Juntermanns, Benjamin
Kaiser, Gernot Maximilian
Orth, Lena
Reis, Henning
Jaradat, Derar
Sydor, Svenja
Buechter, Matthias
Kasper, Stefan
Mathé, Zoltan
Sotiropoulos, Georgios Charalambos
Baba, Hideo Andreas
Canbay, Ali
Paul, Andreas
Fingas, Christian Dominik
author_sort Juntermanns, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current seventh edition of the TNM classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) includes tumor number, vascular invasion, lymph node involvement but no longer the tumor size as compared to the sixth edition. The impact of the seventh edition on stage-based prognostic prediction for patients with ICC was evaluated. METHODS: Between 03/2001 and 02/2013, 98 patients with the diagnosis of an ICC were surgically treated at our center. Median survival times were calculated for these patients after separate classification by both sixth and seventh editions. RESULTS: Median overall survival was increased in patients classified to the lower tumor stages I and II using the seventh as compared to the sixth edition: stage I (54.9 vs. 47.3 months), stage II (19.9 vs. 18.9 months), stage III (17.2 vs. 19.9 months), and stage IV (23.2 vs. 15.3 months), respectively. The seventh edition definition of the T category resulted in an increased median survival regarding the T1 (50.4 vs. 47.3 months) as well as the T2 category (19.9 vs. 15.6 months) and revealed a reduced median survival of patients within the T3 (21.6 vs. 24.8 months) as well as the T4 category (19.9 vs. 27.0 months). CONCLUSIONS: The UICC seventh edition TNM classification for ICC improves separation of patients with intermediate stage tumors as compared to the sixth edition. The prognostic value of the UICC staging system has been improved by the seventh edition. Trial registration The data for this study have been retrospectively registered and the study has been approved by the ethic committee of the medical faculty of the University Hospital of Essen, Germany (license number 15-6353-BO).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5984789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59847892018-06-07 Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Juntermanns, Benjamin Kaiser, Gernot Maximilian Orth, Lena Reis, Henning Jaradat, Derar Sydor, Svenja Buechter, Matthias Kasper, Stefan Mathé, Zoltan Sotiropoulos, Georgios Charalambos Baba, Hideo Andreas Canbay, Ali Paul, Andreas Fingas, Christian Dominik Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The current seventh edition of the TNM classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) includes tumor number, vascular invasion, lymph node involvement but no longer the tumor size as compared to the sixth edition. The impact of the seventh edition on stage-based prognostic prediction for patients with ICC was evaluated. METHODS: Between 03/2001 and 02/2013, 98 patients with the diagnosis of an ICC were surgically treated at our center. Median survival times were calculated for these patients after separate classification by both sixth and seventh editions. RESULTS: Median overall survival was increased in patients classified to the lower tumor stages I and II using the seventh as compared to the sixth edition: stage I (54.9 vs. 47.3 months), stage II (19.9 vs. 18.9 months), stage III (17.2 vs. 19.9 months), and stage IV (23.2 vs. 15.3 months), respectively. The seventh edition definition of the T category resulted in an increased median survival regarding the T1 (50.4 vs. 47.3 months) as well as the T2 category (19.9 vs. 15.6 months) and revealed a reduced median survival of patients within the T3 (21.6 vs. 24.8 months) as well as the T4 category (19.9 vs. 27.0 months). CONCLUSIONS: The UICC seventh edition TNM classification for ICC improves separation of patients with intermediate stage tumors as compared to the sixth edition. The prognostic value of the UICC staging system has been improved by the seventh edition. Trial registration The data for this study have been retrospectively registered and the study has been approved by the ethic committee of the medical faculty of the University Hospital of Essen, Germany (license number 15-6353-BO). BioMed Central 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5984789/ /pubmed/29859128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0329-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Juntermanns, Benjamin
Kaiser, Gernot Maximilian
Orth, Lena
Reis, Henning
Jaradat, Derar
Sydor, Svenja
Buechter, Matthias
Kasper, Stefan
Mathé, Zoltan
Sotiropoulos, Georgios Charalambos
Baba, Hideo Andreas
Canbay, Ali
Paul, Andreas
Fingas, Christian Dominik
Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title_full Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title_fullStr Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title_short Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
title_sort comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the uicc classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0329-6
work_keys_str_mv AT juntermannsbenjamin comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT kaisergernotmaximilian comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT orthlena comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT reishenning comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT jaradatderar comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT sydorsvenja comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT buechtermatthias comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT kasperstefan comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT mathezoltan comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT sotiropoulosgeorgioscharalambos comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT babahideoandreas comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT canbayali comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT paulandreas comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT fingaschristiandominik comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma