Cargando…
Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
BACKGROUND: The current seventh edition of the TNM classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) includes tumor number, vascular invasion, lymph node involvement but no longer the tumor size as compared to the sixth edition. The impact of the seventh edition on stage-based prognostic pred...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0329-6 |
_version_ | 1783328665211240448 |
---|---|
author | Juntermanns, Benjamin Kaiser, Gernot Maximilian Orth, Lena Reis, Henning Jaradat, Derar Sydor, Svenja Buechter, Matthias Kasper, Stefan Mathé, Zoltan Sotiropoulos, Georgios Charalambos Baba, Hideo Andreas Canbay, Ali Paul, Andreas Fingas, Christian Dominik |
author_facet | Juntermanns, Benjamin Kaiser, Gernot Maximilian Orth, Lena Reis, Henning Jaradat, Derar Sydor, Svenja Buechter, Matthias Kasper, Stefan Mathé, Zoltan Sotiropoulos, Georgios Charalambos Baba, Hideo Andreas Canbay, Ali Paul, Andreas Fingas, Christian Dominik |
author_sort | Juntermanns, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The current seventh edition of the TNM classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) includes tumor number, vascular invasion, lymph node involvement but no longer the tumor size as compared to the sixth edition. The impact of the seventh edition on stage-based prognostic prediction for patients with ICC was evaluated. METHODS: Between 03/2001 and 02/2013, 98 patients with the diagnosis of an ICC were surgically treated at our center. Median survival times were calculated for these patients after separate classification by both sixth and seventh editions. RESULTS: Median overall survival was increased in patients classified to the lower tumor stages I and II using the seventh as compared to the sixth edition: stage I (54.9 vs. 47.3 months), stage II (19.9 vs. 18.9 months), stage III (17.2 vs. 19.9 months), and stage IV (23.2 vs. 15.3 months), respectively. The seventh edition definition of the T category resulted in an increased median survival regarding the T1 (50.4 vs. 47.3 months) as well as the T2 category (19.9 vs. 15.6 months) and revealed a reduced median survival of patients within the T3 (21.6 vs. 24.8 months) as well as the T4 category (19.9 vs. 27.0 months). CONCLUSIONS: The UICC seventh edition TNM classification for ICC improves separation of patients with intermediate stage tumors as compared to the sixth edition. The prognostic value of the UICC staging system has been improved by the seventh edition. Trial registration The data for this study have been retrospectively registered and the study has been approved by the ethic committee of the medical faculty of the University Hospital of Essen, Germany (license number 15-6353-BO). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5984789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59847892018-06-07 Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Juntermanns, Benjamin Kaiser, Gernot Maximilian Orth, Lena Reis, Henning Jaradat, Derar Sydor, Svenja Buechter, Matthias Kasper, Stefan Mathé, Zoltan Sotiropoulos, Georgios Charalambos Baba, Hideo Andreas Canbay, Ali Paul, Andreas Fingas, Christian Dominik Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The current seventh edition of the TNM classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) includes tumor number, vascular invasion, lymph node involvement but no longer the tumor size as compared to the sixth edition. The impact of the seventh edition on stage-based prognostic prediction for patients with ICC was evaluated. METHODS: Between 03/2001 and 02/2013, 98 patients with the diagnosis of an ICC were surgically treated at our center. Median survival times were calculated for these patients after separate classification by both sixth and seventh editions. RESULTS: Median overall survival was increased in patients classified to the lower tumor stages I and II using the seventh as compared to the sixth edition: stage I (54.9 vs. 47.3 months), stage II (19.9 vs. 18.9 months), stage III (17.2 vs. 19.9 months), and stage IV (23.2 vs. 15.3 months), respectively. The seventh edition definition of the T category resulted in an increased median survival regarding the T1 (50.4 vs. 47.3 months) as well as the T2 category (19.9 vs. 15.6 months) and revealed a reduced median survival of patients within the T3 (21.6 vs. 24.8 months) as well as the T4 category (19.9 vs. 27.0 months). CONCLUSIONS: The UICC seventh edition TNM classification for ICC improves separation of patients with intermediate stage tumors as compared to the sixth edition. The prognostic value of the UICC staging system has been improved by the seventh edition. Trial registration The data for this study have been retrospectively registered and the study has been approved by the ethic committee of the medical faculty of the University Hospital of Essen, Germany (license number 15-6353-BO). BioMed Central 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5984789/ /pubmed/29859128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0329-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Juntermanns, Benjamin Kaiser, Gernot Maximilian Orth, Lena Reis, Henning Jaradat, Derar Sydor, Svenja Buechter, Matthias Kasper, Stefan Mathé, Zoltan Sotiropoulos, Georgios Charalambos Baba, Hideo Andreas Canbay, Ali Paul, Andreas Fingas, Christian Dominik Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title | Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full | Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title_short | Comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the UICC classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
title_sort | comparison of the sixth and the seventh editions of the uicc classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0329-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juntermannsbenjamin comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT kaisergernotmaximilian comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT orthlena comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT reishenning comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT jaradatderar comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT sydorsvenja comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT buechtermatthias comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT kasperstefan comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT mathezoltan comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT sotiropoulosgeorgioscharalambos comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT babahideoandreas comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT canbayali comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT paulandreas comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT fingaschristiandominik comparisonofthesixthandtheseventheditionsoftheuiccclassificationforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma |