Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: To assess the efficacy and safety of three available rapid-acting insulin analogs (insulins lispro, aspart and glulisine, respectively) in pregnant women, children/adolescents and people using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nørgaard, Kirsten, Sukumar, Nithya, Rafnsson, Snorri B., Saravanan, Ponnusamy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0411-7
_version_ 1783328678152765440
author Nørgaard, Kirsten
Sukumar, Nithya
Rafnsson, Snorri B.
Saravanan, Ponnusamy
author_facet Nørgaard, Kirsten
Sukumar, Nithya
Rafnsson, Snorri B.
Saravanan, Ponnusamy
author_sort Nørgaard, Kirsten
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To assess the efficacy and safety of three available rapid-acting insulin analogs (insulins lispro, aspart and glulisine, respectively) in pregnant women, children/adolescents and people using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Reviews were searched electronically, and their bibliographies examined to identify suitable studies for review and inclusion in a meta-analysis. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that reported data on relevant clinical outcomes. A different reviewer abstracted data for each of the three subpopulations, and one reviewer abstracted data for all three. Any differences were resolved by consensus or by consulting a fourth reviewer. RESULTS: In people on CSII, rapid-acting insulin analogs lowered postprandial plasma glucose post-breakfast to a greater extent than did regular human insulin (RHI) (mean difference: − 1.63 mmol/L [95% confidence interval − 1.71; − 1.54]), with a comparable risk of hypoglycemia and a trend for lower glycated hemoglobin. In the pediatric population, glycemic control was similar with rapid-acting insulin analogs and RHI, with no safety concerns. Meta-analysis indicated severe hypoglycemic events were comparable for rapid-acting insulin analogs versus RHI (risk difference: 0.00 [95% confidence interval − 0.01; 0.01]). In the pregnancy group, insulin lispro and insulin aspart were safe and effective for both mother and fetus, with glycemic control being at least as good as with RHI. There were no data on insulin glulisine during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Rapid-acting insulin analogs appear generally safe and effective in these special populations; however, additional trials would be helpful. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-018-0411-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5984914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59849142018-06-13 Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Nørgaard, Kirsten Sukumar, Nithya Rafnsson, Snorri B. Saravanan, Ponnusamy Diabetes Ther Review INTRODUCTION: To assess the efficacy and safety of three available rapid-acting insulin analogs (insulins lispro, aspart and glulisine, respectively) in pregnant women, children/adolescents and people using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Reviews were searched electronically, and their bibliographies examined to identify suitable studies for review and inclusion in a meta-analysis. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that reported data on relevant clinical outcomes. A different reviewer abstracted data for each of the three subpopulations, and one reviewer abstracted data for all three. Any differences were resolved by consensus or by consulting a fourth reviewer. RESULTS: In people on CSII, rapid-acting insulin analogs lowered postprandial plasma glucose post-breakfast to a greater extent than did regular human insulin (RHI) (mean difference: − 1.63 mmol/L [95% confidence interval − 1.71; − 1.54]), with a comparable risk of hypoglycemia and a trend for lower glycated hemoglobin. In the pediatric population, glycemic control was similar with rapid-acting insulin analogs and RHI, with no safety concerns. Meta-analysis indicated severe hypoglycemic events were comparable for rapid-acting insulin analogs versus RHI (risk difference: 0.00 [95% confidence interval − 0.01; 0.01]). In the pregnancy group, insulin lispro and insulin aspart were safe and effective for both mother and fetus, with glycemic control being at least as good as with RHI. There were no data on insulin glulisine during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Rapid-acting insulin analogs appear generally safe and effective in these special populations; however, additional trials would be helpful. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-018-0411-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2018-04-05 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5984914/ /pubmed/29623593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0411-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Nørgaard, Kirsten
Sukumar, Nithya
Rafnsson, Snorri B.
Saravanan, Ponnusamy
Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of rapid-acting insulin analogs in special populations with type 1 diabetes or gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0411-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nørgaardkirsten efficacyandsafetyofrapidactinginsulinanalogsinspecialpopulationswithtype1diabetesorgestationaldiabetessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sukumarnithya efficacyandsafetyofrapidactinginsulinanalogsinspecialpopulationswithtype1diabetesorgestationaldiabetessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rafnssonsnorrib efficacyandsafetyofrapidactinginsulinanalogsinspecialpopulationswithtype1diabetesorgestationaldiabetessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saravananponnusamy efficacyandsafetyofrapidactinginsulinanalogsinspecialpopulationswithtype1diabetesorgestationaldiabetessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis