Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia

INTRODUCTION: This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Serbia. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis, implementing a simple short-term model, was used to compare treatment costs and outcomes wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lalić, Nebojša, Russel-Szymczyk, Monika, Culic, Marina, Tikkanen, Christian Klyver, Chubb, Barrie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29700772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0426-0
_version_ 1783328681614114816
author Lalić, Nebojša
Russel-Szymczyk, Monika
Culic, Marina
Tikkanen, Christian Klyver
Chubb, Barrie
author_facet Lalić, Nebojša
Russel-Szymczyk, Monika
Culic, Marina
Tikkanen, Christian Klyver
Chubb, Barrie
author_sort Lalić, Nebojša
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Serbia. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis, implementing a simple short-term model, was used to compare treatment costs and outcomes with degludec versus glargine U100 in patients with type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Cost-effectiveness was analysed in a 1-year setting, based on data from clinical trials. Costs were estimated from the healthcare payer perspective, the Serbian Health Insurance Fund (RFZO). The outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) or cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Degludec is highly cost-effective compared with glargine U100 for people with T1DM and T2DM in Serbia. The ICERs are estimated at 417,586 RSD/QALY gained in T1DM, 558,811 RSD/QALY gained in T2DM on basal oral therapy (T2DM(BOT)) and 1,200,141 RSD/QALY gained in T2DM on basal-bolus therapy (T2DM(B/B)). All ICERs fall below the commonly accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness in Serbia (1,785,642 RSD/QALY gained). In all three patient groups, insulin costs are higher with degludec than with glargine U100, but these costs are partially offset by savings from a lower daily insulin dose in T1DM and T2DM(BOT), a reduction in hypoglycaemic events in all three patient groups and reduced costs of SMBG testing in the T2DM groups with degludec versus glargine U100. CONCLUSION: Degludec is a cost-effective alternative to glargine U100 for patients with T1DM and T2DM in Serbia. Degludec may particularly benefit those suffering from hypoglycaemia or where the patient would benefit from the option of flexible dosing. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-018-0426-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5984929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59849292018-06-13 Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia Lalić, Nebojša Russel-Szymczyk, Monika Culic, Marina Tikkanen, Christian Klyver Chubb, Barrie Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Serbia. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis, implementing a simple short-term model, was used to compare treatment costs and outcomes with degludec versus glargine U100 in patients with type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Cost-effectiveness was analysed in a 1-year setting, based on data from clinical trials. Costs were estimated from the healthcare payer perspective, the Serbian Health Insurance Fund (RFZO). The outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) or cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Degludec is highly cost-effective compared with glargine U100 for people with T1DM and T2DM in Serbia. The ICERs are estimated at 417,586 RSD/QALY gained in T1DM, 558,811 RSD/QALY gained in T2DM on basal oral therapy (T2DM(BOT)) and 1,200,141 RSD/QALY gained in T2DM on basal-bolus therapy (T2DM(B/B)). All ICERs fall below the commonly accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness in Serbia (1,785,642 RSD/QALY gained). In all three patient groups, insulin costs are higher with degludec than with glargine U100, but these costs are partially offset by savings from a lower daily insulin dose in T1DM and T2DM(BOT), a reduction in hypoglycaemic events in all three patient groups and reduced costs of SMBG testing in the T2DM groups with degludec versus glargine U100. CONCLUSION: Degludec is a cost-effective alternative to glargine U100 for patients with T1DM and T2DM in Serbia. Degludec may particularly benefit those suffering from hypoglycaemia or where the patient would benefit from the option of flexible dosing. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-018-0426-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2018-04-26 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5984929/ /pubmed/29700772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0426-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lalić, Nebojša
Russel-Szymczyk, Monika
Culic, Marina
Tikkanen, Christian Klyver
Chubb, Barrie
Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia
title Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia
title_sort cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine u100 in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in serbia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29700772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0426-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lalicnebojsa costeffectivenessofinsulindegludecversusinsulinglargineu100inpatientswithtype1andtype2diabetesmellitusinserbia
AT russelszymczykmonika costeffectivenessofinsulindegludecversusinsulinglargineu100inpatientswithtype1andtype2diabetesmellitusinserbia
AT culicmarina costeffectivenessofinsulindegludecversusinsulinglargineu100inpatientswithtype1andtype2diabetesmellitusinserbia
AT tikkanenchristianklyver costeffectivenessofinsulindegludecversusinsulinglargineu100inpatientswithtype1andtype2diabetesmellitusinserbia
AT chubbbarrie costeffectivenessofinsulindegludecversusinsulinglargineu100inpatientswithtype1andtype2diabetesmellitusinserbia