Cargando…

Anesthesiologists' Preferences regarding Visitor Presence during Placement of Neuraxial Labor Analgesia

INTRODUCTION: Neuraxial labor analgesia has become an integral part of modern obstetric anesthetic practice. Presence of a familiar person during its placement may be beneficial to the patient. A survey was sent to anesthesiologists practicing obstetric anesthesia in the USA to determine their views...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumaraswami, Sangeeta, Pothula, Suryanarayana, Inchiosa, Mario Anthony, Kubal, Keshar Paul, Burns, Micah Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29887886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3481975
_version_ 1783328709621579776
author Kumaraswami, Sangeeta
Pothula, Suryanarayana
Inchiosa, Mario Anthony
Kubal, Keshar Paul
Burns, Micah Alexander
author_facet Kumaraswami, Sangeeta
Pothula, Suryanarayana
Inchiosa, Mario Anthony
Kubal, Keshar Paul
Burns, Micah Alexander
author_sort Kumaraswami, Sangeeta
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Neuraxial labor analgesia has become an integral part of modern obstetric anesthetic practice. Presence of a familiar person during its placement may be beneficial to the patient. A survey was sent to anesthesiologists practicing obstetric anesthesia in the USA to determine their views. METHODS: The survey queried the following: existence of a written policy; would they allow a visitor; visitor's view, sitting or standing; reasons to allow or not allow a visitor; and influence by other staff on the decision. The responses were analyzed using multiple chi-square analyses. RESULTS: Most practitioners supported allowing a visitor during placement. Reduction of patient anxiety and fulfillment of patient request were the major reasons for allowing a visitor. Sitting position and no view of the workspace were preferred. Visitor interference and safety were cited as the major reasons for precluding a visitor. Nonanesthesia providers rarely influenced the decision. Epidural analgesia was the preferred technique. Essentially no bias was found in the responses; there was statistical uniformity regardless of procedures done per week, years in practice, professional certification, geographic region (rural, urban, or suburban), or academic, private, or government responders. CONCLUSION: The practice of visitor presence during the placement of neuraxial labor analgesia is gaining acceptance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5985117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59851172018-06-10 Anesthesiologists' Preferences regarding Visitor Presence during Placement of Neuraxial Labor Analgesia Kumaraswami, Sangeeta Pothula, Suryanarayana Inchiosa, Mario Anthony Kubal, Keshar Paul Burns, Micah Alexander Anesthesiol Res Pract Research Article INTRODUCTION: Neuraxial labor analgesia has become an integral part of modern obstetric anesthetic practice. Presence of a familiar person during its placement may be beneficial to the patient. A survey was sent to anesthesiologists practicing obstetric anesthesia in the USA to determine their views. METHODS: The survey queried the following: existence of a written policy; would they allow a visitor; visitor's view, sitting or standing; reasons to allow or not allow a visitor; and influence by other staff on the decision. The responses were analyzed using multiple chi-square analyses. RESULTS: Most practitioners supported allowing a visitor during placement. Reduction of patient anxiety and fulfillment of patient request were the major reasons for allowing a visitor. Sitting position and no view of the workspace were preferred. Visitor interference and safety were cited as the major reasons for precluding a visitor. Nonanesthesia providers rarely influenced the decision. Epidural analgesia was the preferred technique. Essentially no bias was found in the responses; there was statistical uniformity regardless of procedures done per week, years in practice, professional certification, geographic region (rural, urban, or suburban), or academic, private, or government responders. CONCLUSION: The practice of visitor presence during the placement of neuraxial labor analgesia is gaining acceptance. Hindawi 2018-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5985117/ /pubmed/29887886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3481975 Text en Copyright © 2018 Sangeeta Kumaraswami et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kumaraswami, Sangeeta
Pothula, Suryanarayana
Inchiosa, Mario Anthony
Kubal, Keshar Paul
Burns, Micah Alexander
Anesthesiologists' Preferences regarding Visitor Presence during Placement of Neuraxial Labor Analgesia
title Anesthesiologists' Preferences regarding Visitor Presence during Placement of Neuraxial Labor Analgesia
title_full Anesthesiologists' Preferences regarding Visitor Presence during Placement of Neuraxial Labor Analgesia
title_fullStr Anesthesiologists' Preferences regarding Visitor Presence during Placement of Neuraxial Labor Analgesia
title_full_unstemmed Anesthesiologists' Preferences regarding Visitor Presence during Placement of Neuraxial Labor Analgesia
title_short Anesthesiologists' Preferences regarding Visitor Presence during Placement of Neuraxial Labor Analgesia
title_sort anesthesiologists' preferences regarding visitor presence during placement of neuraxial labor analgesia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29887886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3481975
work_keys_str_mv AT kumaraswamisangeeta anesthesiologistspreferencesregardingvisitorpresenceduringplacementofneuraxiallaboranalgesia
AT pothulasuryanarayana anesthesiologistspreferencesregardingvisitorpresenceduringplacementofneuraxiallaboranalgesia
AT inchiosamarioanthony anesthesiologistspreferencesregardingvisitorpresenceduringplacementofneuraxiallaboranalgesia
AT kubalkesharpaul anesthesiologistspreferencesregardingvisitorpresenceduringplacementofneuraxiallaboranalgesia
AT burnsmicahalexander anesthesiologistspreferencesregardingvisitorpresenceduringplacementofneuraxiallaboranalgesia