Cargando…

Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer

The aim of this study was to investigate how the affordances of an indoor climbing wall changed for intermediate climbers following a period of practice during which hold orientation was manipulated within a learning and transfer protocol. The learning protocol consisted of four sessions, in which e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seifert, Ludovic, Orth, Dominic, Mantel, Bruno, Boulanger, Jérémie, Hérault, Romain, Dicks, Matt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29892251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00820
_version_ 1783328774711934976
author Seifert, Ludovic
Orth, Dominic
Mantel, Bruno
Boulanger, Jérémie
Hérault, Romain
Dicks, Matt
author_facet Seifert, Ludovic
Orth, Dominic
Mantel, Bruno
Boulanger, Jérémie
Hérault, Romain
Dicks, Matt
author_sort Seifert, Ludovic
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to investigate how the affordances of an indoor climbing wall changed for intermediate climbers following a period of practice during which hold orientation was manipulated within a learning and transfer protocol. The learning protocol consisted of four sessions, in which eight climbers randomly ascended three different routes of fixed absolute difficulty (5c on the French scale), as fluently as possible. All three routes were 10.3 m in height and composed of 20 hand-holds at the same locations on an artificial climbing wall; only hold orientations were altered: (i) a horizontal-edge route (H) was designed to afford horizontal hold grasping, (ii) a vertical-edge route (V) afforded vertical hold grasping, and (iii), a double-edge route (D) was designed to afford both horizontal and vertical hold grasping. Five inertial measurement units (IMU) (3D accelerometer, 3D gyroscope, 3D magnetometer) were attached to the hip, feet and forearms to analyze the vertical acceleration and direction (3D unitary vector) of each limb and hip in ambient space during the entire ascent. Segmentation and classification processes supported detection of movement and stationary phases for each IMU. Depending on whether limbs and/or hip were moving, a decision tree distinguished four states of behavior: stationary (absence of limb and hip motion), hold exploration (absence of hip motion but at least one limb in motion), hip movement (hip in motion but absence of limb motion) and global motion (hip in motion and at least one limb in motion). Results showed that with practice, the learners decreased the relative duration of hold exploration, suggesting that they improved affordance perception of hold grasp-ability. The number of performatory movements also decreased as performance increased during learning sessions, confirming that participants' climbing efficacy improved as a function of practice. Last, the results were more marked for the H route, while the D route led to longer relative stationary duration and a shorter relative duration of performatory states. Together, these findings emphasized the benefit of manipulating task constraints to promote safe exploration during learning, which is particularly relevant in extreme sports involving climbing tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5985557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59855572018-06-11 Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer Seifert, Ludovic Orth, Dominic Mantel, Bruno Boulanger, Jérémie Hérault, Romain Dicks, Matt Front Psychol Psychology The aim of this study was to investigate how the affordances of an indoor climbing wall changed for intermediate climbers following a period of practice during which hold orientation was manipulated within a learning and transfer protocol. The learning protocol consisted of four sessions, in which eight climbers randomly ascended three different routes of fixed absolute difficulty (5c on the French scale), as fluently as possible. All three routes were 10.3 m in height and composed of 20 hand-holds at the same locations on an artificial climbing wall; only hold orientations were altered: (i) a horizontal-edge route (H) was designed to afford horizontal hold grasping, (ii) a vertical-edge route (V) afforded vertical hold grasping, and (iii), a double-edge route (D) was designed to afford both horizontal and vertical hold grasping. Five inertial measurement units (IMU) (3D accelerometer, 3D gyroscope, 3D magnetometer) were attached to the hip, feet and forearms to analyze the vertical acceleration and direction (3D unitary vector) of each limb and hip in ambient space during the entire ascent. Segmentation and classification processes supported detection of movement and stationary phases for each IMU. Depending on whether limbs and/or hip were moving, a decision tree distinguished four states of behavior: stationary (absence of limb and hip motion), hold exploration (absence of hip motion but at least one limb in motion), hip movement (hip in motion but absence of limb motion) and global motion (hip in motion and at least one limb in motion). Results showed that with practice, the learners decreased the relative duration of hold exploration, suggesting that they improved affordance perception of hold grasp-ability. The number of performatory movements also decreased as performance increased during learning sessions, confirming that participants' climbing efficacy improved as a function of practice. Last, the results were more marked for the H route, while the D route led to longer relative stationary duration and a shorter relative duration of performatory states. Together, these findings emphasized the benefit of manipulating task constraints to promote safe exploration during learning, which is particularly relevant in extreme sports involving climbing tasks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5985557/ /pubmed/29892251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00820 Text en Copyright © 2018 Seifert, Orth, Mantel, Boulanger, Hérault and Dicks. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Seifert, Ludovic
Orth, Dominic
Mantel, Bruno
Boulanger, Jérémie
Hérault, Romain
Dicks, Matt
Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer
title Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer
title_full Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer
title_fullStr Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer
title_full_unstemmed Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer
title_short Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer
title_sort affordance realization in climbing: learning and transfer
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29892251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00820
work_keys_str_mv AT seifertludovic affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer
AT orthdominic affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer
AT mantelbruno affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer
AT boulangerjeremie affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer
AT heraultromain affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer
AT dicksmatt affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer