Cargando…
Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer
The aim of this study was to investigate how the affordances of an indoor climbing wall changed for intermediate climbers following a period of practice during which hold orientation was manipulated within a learning and transfer protocol. The learning protocol consisted of four sessions, in which e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29892251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00820 |
_version_ | 1783328774711934976 |
---|---|
author | Seifert, Ludovic Orth, Dominic Mantel, Bruno Boulanger, Jérémie Hérault, Romain Dicks, Matt |
author_facet | Seifert, Ludovic Orth, Dominic Mantel, Bruno Boulanger, Jérémie Hérault, Romain Dicks, Matt |
author_sort | Seifert, Ludovic |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to investigate how the affordances of an indoor climbing wall changed for intermediate climbers following a period of practice during which hold orientation was manipulated within a learning and transfer protocol. The learning protocol consisted of four sessions, in which eight climbers randomly ascended three different routes of fixed absolute difficulty (5c on the French scale), as fluently as possible. All three routes were 10.3 m in height and composed of 20 hand-holds at the same locations on an artificial climbing wall; only hold orientations were altered: (i) a horizontal-edge route (H) was designed to afford horizontal hold grasping, (ii) a vertical-edge route (V) afforded vertical hold grasping, and (iii), a double-edge route (D) was designed to afford both horizontal and vertical hold grasping. Five inertial measurement units (IMU) (3D accelerometer, 3D gyroscope, 3D magnetometer) were attached to the hip, feet and forearms to analyze the vertical acceleration and direction (3D unitary vector) of each limb and hip in ambient space during the entire ascent. Segmentation and classification processes supported detection of movement and stationary phases for each IMU. Depending on whether limbs and/or hip were moving, a decision tree distinguished four states of behavior: stationary (absence of limb and hip motion), hold exploration (absence of hip motion but at least one limb in motion), hip movement (hip in motion but absence of limb motion) and global motion (hip in motion and at least one limb in motion). Results showed that with practice, the learners decreased the relative duration of hold exploration, suggesting that they improved affordance perception of hold grasp-ability. The number of performatory movements also decreased as performance increased during learning sessions, confirming that participants' climbing efficacy improved as a function of practice. Last, the results were more marked for the H route, while the D route led to longer relative stationary duration and a shorter relative duration of performatory states. Together, these findings emphasized the benefit of manipulating task constraints to promote safe exploration during learning, which is particularly relevant in extreme sports involving climbing tasks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5985557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59855572018-06-11 Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer Seifert, Ludovic Orth, Dominic Mantel, Bruno Boulanger, Jérémie Hérault, Romain Dicks, Matt Front Psychol Psychology The aim of this study was to investigate how the affordances of an indoor climbing wall changed for intermediate climbers following a period of practice during which hold orientation was manipulated within a learning and transfer protocol. The learning protocol consisted of four sessions, in which eight climbers randomly ascended three different routes of fixed absolute difficulty (5c on the French scale), as fluently as possible. All three routes were 10.3 m in height and composed of 20 hand-holds at the same locations on an artificial climbing wall; only hold orientations were altered: (i) a horizontal-edge route (H) was designed to afford horizontal hold grasping, (ii) a vertical-edge route (V) afforded vertical hold grasping, and (iii), a double-edge route (D) was designed to afford both horizontal and vertical hold grasping. Five inertial measurement units (IMU) (3D accelerometer, 3D gyroscope, 3D magnetometer) were attached to the hip, feet and forearms to analyze the vertical acceleration and direction (3D unitary vector) of each limb and hip in ambient space during the entire ascent. Segmentation and classification processes supported detection of movement and stationary phases for each IMU. Depending on whether limbs and/or hip were moving, a decision tree distinguished four states of behavior: stationary (absence of limb and hip motion), hold exploration (absence of hip motion but at least one limb in motion), hip movement (hip in motion but absence of limb motion) and global motion (hip in motion and at least one limb in motion). Results showed that with practice, the learners decreased the relative duration of hold exploration, suggesting that they improved affordance perception of hold grasp-ability. The number of performatory movements also decreased as performance increased during learning sessions, confirming that participants' climbing efficacy improved as a function of practice. Last, the results were more marked for the H route, while the D route led to longer relative stationary duration and a shorter relative duration of performatory states. Together, these findings emphasized the benefit of manipulating task constraints to promote safe exploration during learning, which is particularly relevant in extreme sports involving climbing tasks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5985557/ /pubmed/29892251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00820 Text en Copyright © 2018 Seifert, Orth, Mantel, Boulanger, Hérault and Dicks. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Seifert, Ludovic Orth, Dominic Mantel, Bruno Boulanger, Jérémie Hérault, Romain Dicks, Matt Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer |
title | Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer |
title_full | Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer |
title_fullStr | Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer |
title_full_unstemmed | Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer |
title_short | Affordance Realization in Climbing: Learning and Transfer |
title_sort | affordance realization in climbing: learning and transfer |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29892251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00820 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seifertludovic affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer AT orthdominic affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer AT mantelbruno affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer AT boulangerjeremie affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer AT heraultromain affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer AT dicksmatt affordancerealizationinclimbinglearningandtransfer |