Cargando…

Prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a laparoscopy-guided administration of aerosolized chemotherapy. PIPAC seems to improve objective tumor response, survival and quality of life in patients with peritoneal metastasis. We assessed feasibility and efficacy of PIPAC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graversen, Martin, Detlefsen, Sönke, Bjerregaard, Jon Kroll, Fristrup, Claus Wilki, Pfeiffer, Per, Mortensen, Michael Bau
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29899763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835918777036
_version_ 1783328785256415232
author Graversen, Martin
Detlefsen, Sönke
Bjerregaard, Jon Kroll
Fristrup, Claus Wilki
Pfeiffer, Per
Mortensen, Michael Bau
author_facet Graversen, Martin
Detlefsen, Sönke
Bjerregaard, Jon Kroll
Fristrup, Claus Wilki
Pfeiffer, Per
Mortensen, Michael Bau
author_sort Graversen, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a laparoscopy-guided administration of aerosolized chemotherapy. PIPAC seems to improve objective tumor response, survival and quality of life in patients with peritoneal metastasis. We assessed feasibility and efficacy of PIPAC in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). METHODS: Patients were included in a prospective PIPAC protocol. Patients with colorectal PM were treated with oxaliplatin, patients with other primary tumors were treated with cisplatin and doxorubicin. Any chemotherapy exposure for healthcare workers was monitored by environmental and biological sampling. Feasibility was quantified by completion and complication rates. Response evaluation was documented by the peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) and by peritoneal lavage cytology. Biopsy sites were marked by clips. Quality of life questionnaires were collected at baseline and after 60, 120 and 180 days. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients with PM were treated with a median of three PIPAC procedures (range 1–9). Intraperitoneal access and completion of PIPAC was achieved in all patients. Few complications and adverse events were noted. There was no risk of chemotherapy exposure for healthcare workers. The mean PRGS was reduced significantly and a reduction of the PRGS was seen in 67% of the patients. Conversion from positive to negative cytology was achieved in 23% of the patients. Quality of life was stabilized from baseline to day 60. CONCLUSIONS: PIPAC is feasible and well tolerated, may stabilize the quality of life in patients with end-stage PM and may induce histological and cytological regression. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02320448].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5985602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59856022018-06-13 Prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis Graversen, Martin Detlefsen, Sönke Bjerregaard, Jon Kroll Fristrup, Claus Wilki Pfeiffer, Per Mortensen, Michael Bau Ther Adv Med Oncol Original Research BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a laparoscopy-guided administration of aerosolized chemotherapy. PIPAC seems to improve objective tumor response, survival and quality of life in patients with peritoneal metastasis. We assessed feasibility and efficacy of PIPAC in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). METHODS: Patients were included in a prospective PIPAC protocol. Patients with colorectal PM were treated with oxaliplatin, patients with other primary tumors were treated with cisplatin and doxorubicin. Any chemotherapy exposure for healthcare workers was monitored by environmental and biological sampling. Feasibility was quantified by completion and complication rates. Response evaluation was documented by the peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) and by peritoneal lavage cytology. Biopsy sites were marked by clips. Quality of life questionnaires were collected at baseline and after 60, 120 and 180 days. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients with PM were treated with a median of three PIPAC procedures (range 1–9). Intraperitoneal access and completion of PIPAC was achieved in all patients. Few complications and adverse events were noted. There was no risk of chemotherapy exposure for healthcare workers. The mean PRGS was reduced significantly and a reduction of the PRGS was seen in 67% of the patients. Conversion from positive to negative cytology was achieved in 23% of the patients. Quality of life was stabilized from baseline to day 60. CONCLUSIONS: PIPAC is feasible and well tolerated, may stabilize the quality of life in patients with end-stage PM and may induce histological and cytological regression. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02320448]. SAGE Publications 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5985602/ /pubmed/29899763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835918777036 Text en © The Author(s), 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Graversen, Martin
Detlefsen, Sönke
Bjerregaard, Jon Kroll
Fristrup, Claus Wilki
Pfeiffer, Per
Mortensen, Michael Bau
Prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis
title Prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis
title_full Prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis
title_fullStr Prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis
title_short Prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis
title_sort prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (pipac) for peritoneal metastasis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29899763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835918777036
work_keys_str_mv AT graversenmartin prospectivesinglecenterimplementationandresponseevaluationofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacforperitonealmetastasis
AT detlefsensonke prospectivesinglecenterimplementationandresponseevaluationofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacforperitonealmetastasis
AT bjerregaardjonkroll prospectivesinglecenterimplementationandresponseevaluationofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacforperitonealmetastasis
AT fristrupclauswilki prospectivesinglecenterimplementationandresponseevaluationofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacforperitonealmetastasis
AT pfeifferper prospectivesinglecenterimplementationandresponseevaluationofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacforperitonealmetastasis
AT mortensenmichaelbau prospectivesinglecenterimplementationandresponseevaluationofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacforperitonealmetastasis