Cargando…

Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life

BACKGROUND: Existing definitions of happiness, subjective well-being, and quality of life suggest conceptual overlap between these constructs. This study explored the relationship between these well-being constructs by applying widely used measures with satisfactory psychometric properties. MATERIAL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medvedev, Oleg N., Landhuis, C. Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876148
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4903
_version_ 1783328817082793984
author Medvedev, Oleg N.
Landhuis, C. Erik
author_facet Medvedev, Oleg N.
Landhuis, C. Erik
author_sort Medvedev, Oleg N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Existing definitions of happiness, subjective well-being, and quality of life suggest conceptual overlap between these constructs. This study explored the relationship between these well-being constructs by applying widely used measures with satisfactory psychometric properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: University students (n = 180) completed widely used well-being measures including the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Satisfaction with Life Scale, and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. We analyzed the data using correlation, regression, and exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: All included well-being measures demonstrated high loadings on the global well-being construct that explains about 80% of the variance in the OHQ, the psychological domain of Quality of Life and subjective well-being. The results show high positive correlations between happiness, psychological and health domains of quality of life, life satisfaction, and positive affect. Social and environmental domains of quality of life were poor predictors of happiness and subjective well-being after controlling for psychological quality of life. CONCLUSION: Together, these data provide support for a global well-being dimension and interchangeable use of terms happiness, subjective well-being, and psychological quality of life with the current sample and measures. Further investigation with larger heterogeneous samples and other well-being measures is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5985772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59857722018-06-06 Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life Medvedev, Oleg N. Landhuis, C. Erik PeerJ Global Health BACKGROUND: Existing definitions of happiness, subjective well-being, and quality of life suggest conceptual overlap between these constructs. This study explored the relationship between these well-being constructs by applying widely used measures with satisfactory psychometric properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: University students (n = 180) completed widely used well-being measures including the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Satisfaction with Life Scale, and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. We analyzed the data using correlation, regression, and exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: All included well-being measures demonstrated high loadings on the global well-being construct that explains about 80% of the variance in the OHQ, the psychological domain of Quality of Life and subjective well-being. The results show high positive correlations between happiness, psychological and health domains of quality of life, life satisfaction, and positive affect. Social and environmental domains of quality of life were poor predictors of happiness and subjective well-being after controlling for psychological quality of life. CONCLUSION: Together, these data provide support for a global well-being dimension and interchangeable use of terms happiness, subjective well-being, and psychological quality of life with the current sample and measures. Further investigation with larger heterogeneous samples and other well-being measures is warranted. PeerJ Inc. 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5985772/ /pubmed/29876148 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4903 Text en © 2018 Medvedev and Landhuis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Global Health
Medvedev, Oleg N.
Landhuis, C. Erik
Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life
title Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life
title_full Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life
title_fullStr Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life
title_full_unstemmed Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life
title_short Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life
title_sort exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876148
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4903
work_keys_str_mv AT medvedevolegn exploringconstructsofwellbeinghappinessandqualityoflife
AT landhuiscerik exploringconstructsofwellbeinghappinessandqualityoflife