Cargando…

Economic evaluation of point-of-care testing in the remote primary health care setting of Australia’s Northern Territory

AIM: To determine the cost-effectiveness of utilizing point-of-care testing (POCT) on the Abbott i-STAT device as a support tool to aid decisions regarding the emergency medical retrievals of patients at remote health centers in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia. METHODS: A decision analytic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spaeth, Brooke A, Kaambwa, Billingsley, Shephard, Mark DS, Omond, Rodney
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881299
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S160291
_version_ 1783328821007613952
author Spaeth, Brooke A
Kaambwa, Billingsley
Shephard, Mark DS
Omond, Rodney
author_facet Spaeth, Brooke A
Kaambwa, Billingsley
Shephard, Mark DS
Omond, Rodney
author_sort Spaeth, Brooke A
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine the cost-effectiveness of utilizing point-of-care testing (POCT) on the Abbott i-STAT device as a support tool to aid decisions regarding the emergency medical retrievals of patients at remote health centers in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia. METHODS: A decision analytic simulation model–based economic evaluation was conducted using data from patients presenting with three common acute conditions (chest pain, chronic renal failure due to missed dialysis session(s), and acute diarrhea) at six remote NT health centers from July to December 2015. The specific outcomes measured in this study were the number of unnecessary emergency medical retrieval prevented through POCT. Cost savings through prevented unnecessary medical retrievals for each presentation type were then determined and extrapolated to give per annum NT-wide estimates. RESULTS: POCT prevented 60 unnecessary medical evacuations from a total of 200 patient cases meeting the selection criteria (48/147 for chest pain, 10/28 for missed dialysis, and 2/25 for acute diarrhea). The associated cost savings were AUD $4,674, $8,034, and $786 per patient translating to NT-wide savings of AUD $13.72 million, $6.45 million, and $1.57 million per annum (AUD $21.75 million in total) for chest pain, missed dialysis, and acute diarrhea presentations, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that POCT when used to aid decision making for acutely ill patients delivered significant cost savings for the NT health care system by preventing unnecessary emergency medical retrievals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5985789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59857892018-06-07 Economic evaluation of point-of-care testing in the remote primary health care setting of Australia’s Northern Territory Spaeth, Brooke A Kaambwa, Billingsley Shephard, Mark DS Omond, Rodney Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research AIM: To determine the cost-effectiveness of utilizing point-of-care testing (POCT) on the Abbott i-STAT device as a support tool to aid decisions regarding the emergency medical retrievals of patients at remote health centers in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia. METHODS: A decision analytic simulation model–based economic evaluation was conducted using data from patients presenting with three common acute conditions (chest pain, chronic renal failure due to missed dialysis session(s), and acute diarrhea) at six remote NT health centers from July to December 2015. The specific outcomes measured in this study were the number of unnecessary emergency medical retrieval prevented through POCT. Cost savings through prevented unnecessary medical retrievals for each presentation type were then determined and extrapolated to give per annum NT-wide estimates. RESULTS: POCT prevented 60 unnecessary medical evacuations from a total of 200 patient cases meeting the selection criteria (48/147 for chest pain, 10/28 for missed dialysis, and 2/25 for acute diarrhea). The associated cost savings were AUD $4,674, $8,034, and $786 per patient translating to NT-wide savings of AUD $13.72 million, $6.45 million, and $1.57 million per annum (AUD $21.75 million in total) for chest pain, missed dialysis, and acute diarrhea presentations, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that POCT when used to aid decision making for acutely ill patients delivered significant cost savings for the NT health care system by preventing unnecessary emergency medical retrievals. Dove Medical Press 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5985789/ /pubmed/29881299 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S160291 Text en © 2018 Spaeth et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Spaeth, Brooke A
Kaambwa, Billingsley
Shephard, Mark DS
Omond, Rodney
Economic evaluation of point-of-care testing in the remote primary health care setting of Australia’s Northern Territory
title Economic evaluation of point-of-care testing in the remote primary health care setting of Australia’s Northern Territory
title_full Economic evaluation of point-of-care testing in the remote primary health care setting of Australia’s Northern Territory
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of point-of-care testing in the remote primary health care setting of Australia’s Northern Territory
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of point-of-care testing in the remote primary health care setting of Australia’s Northern Territory
title_short Economic evaluation of point-of-care testing in the remote primary health care setting of Australia’s Northern Territory
title_sort economic evaluation of point-of-care testing in the remote primary health care setting of australia’s northern territory
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881299
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S160291
work_keys_str_mv AT spaethbrookea economicevaluationofpointofcaretestingintheremoteprimaryhealthcaresettingofaustraliasnorthernterritory
AT kaambwabillingsley economicevaluationofpointofcaretestingintheremoteprimaryhealthcaresettingofaustraliasnorthernterritory
AT shephardmarkds economicevaluationofpointofcaretestingintheremoteprimaryhealthcaresettingofaustraliasnorthernterritory
AT omondrodney economicevaluationofpointofcaretestingintheremoteprimaryhealthcaresettingofaustraliasnorthernterritory