Cargando…

Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Both osteoporosis and osteopenia remain worldwide public health concerns. They both lead to bone fractures, which can lead to disability and burden on those who are afflicted. OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare fracture risk between these two groups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomasevic-Todorovic, Snezana, Vazic, Atina, Issaka, Abukari, Hanna, Fahad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881314
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S151307
_version_ 1783328821702819840
author Tomasevic-Todorovic, Snezana
Vazic, Atina
Issaka, Abukari
Hanna, Fahad
author_facet Tomasevic-Todorovic, Snezana
Vazic, Atina
Issaka, Abukari
Hanna, Fahad
author_sort Tomasevic-Todorovic, Snezana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both osteoporosis and osteopenia remain worldwide public health concerns. They both lead to bone fractures, which can lead to disability and burden on those who are afflicted. OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare fracture risk between these two groups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our cross-sectional study included 82 patients (46 with osteoporosis and 36 with osteopenia) with an average age of 63±9.33 years, who received treatment at the Clinic for Medical Rehabilitation, Clinical Center of Vojvodina in Novi Sad, Serbia. The assessment of the fracture risk was executed by applying the Fracture Assessment Risk (FRAX) index (an algorithm developed by the World Health Organization) based on clinical fracture risks or combination of clinical fracture risks and bone mineral density. RESULTS: Patients with osteoporosis had significantly higher risk of major fracture compared to patients with osteopenia (p<0.01). Results from FRAX index in osteoporotic patients showed that more than half (58.70%) of patients had a low risk of fracture; less than one-third of patients (30.43%) had an intermediate risk of major osteoporotic fracture, while almost four out of every 10 (39.96%) had a high risk of hip fracture. The majority of patients with osteopenia (63.89%) had a low risk of major osteoporotic fracture, while 36.11% of them had an intermediate risk. The majority of patients with osteopenia (91.67%) had a low risk of hip fracture. Statistically significant differences in relation to specific fracture risks between patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia, in particular, weight (t=−2.250, p=0.027*) and previous fractures (t=2.985, p=0.004**), were established. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis patients had a high risk of major osteoporotic fracture, while there was no association between the intermediate level for major osteoporotic fracture and osteo-penia. For patients suffering from an increased fracture risk, especially those who had already been diagnosed with osteoporosis, preventive measures such as designing individual therapeutic programs should be adopted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5985792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59857922018-06-07 Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study Tomasevic-Todorovic, Snezana Vazic, Atina Issaka, Abukari Hanna, Fahad Open Access Rheumatol Original Research BACKGROUND: Both osteoporosis and osteopenia remain worldwide public health concerns. They both lead to bone fractures, which can lead to disability and burden on those who are afflicted. OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare fracture risk between these two groups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our cross-sectional study included 82 patients (46 with osteoporosis and 36 with osteopenia) with an average age of 63±9.33 years, who received treatment at the Clinic for Medical Rehabilitation, Clinical Center of Vojvodina in Novi Sad, Serbia. The assessment of the fracture risk was executed by applying the Fracture Assessment Risk (FRAX) index (an algorithm developed by the World Health Organization) based on clinical fracture risks or combination of clinical fracture risks and bone mineral density. RESULTS: Patients with osteoporosis had significantly higher risk of major fracture compared to patients with osteopenia (p<0.01). Results from FRAX index in osteoporotic patients showed that more than half (58.70%) of patients had a low risk of fracture; less than one-third of patients (30.43%) had an intermediate risk of major osteoporotic fracture, while almost four out of every 10 (39.96%) had a high risk of hip fracture. The majority of patients with osteopenia (63.89%) had a low risk of major osteoporotic fracture, while 36.11% of them had an intermediate risk. The majority of patients with osteopenia (91.67%) had a low risk of hip fracture. Statistically significant differences in relation to specific fracture risks between patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia, in particular, weight (t=−2.250, p=0.027*) and previous fractures (t=2.985, p=0.004**), were established. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis patients had a high risk of major osteoporotic fracture, while there was no association between the intermediate level for major osteoporotic fracture and osteo-penia. For patients suffering from an increased fracture risk, especially those who had already been diagnosed with osteoporosis, preventive measures such as designing individual therapeutic programs should be adopted. Dove Medical Press 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5985792/ /pubmed/29881314 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S151307 Text en © 2018 Tomasevic-Todorovic et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tomasevic-Todorovic, Snezana
Vazic, Atina
Issaka, Abukari
Hanna, Fahad
Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study
title Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study
title_full Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study
title_short Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study
title_sort comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881314
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S151307
work_keys_str_mv AT tomasevictodorovicsnezana comparativeassessmentoffractureriskamongosteoporosisandosteopeniapatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT vazicatina comparativeassessmentoffractureriskamongosteoporosisandosteopeniapatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT issakaabukari comparativeassessmentoffractureriskamongosteoporosisandosteopeniapatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT hannafahad comparativeassessmentoffractureriskamongosteoporosisandosteopeniapatientsacrosssectionalstudy