Cargando…

Florida Populations Most at Risk of Not Being Up to Date With Colorectal Cancer Screening

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of populations at risk of not being up to date on colorectal cancer screening in Florida. METHODS: We used Exhaustive Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection, a classification tree analysis, to identify subgroups not up t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aguado Loi, Claudia X., Adegoke, Korede K., Gwede, Clement K., Sappenfield, William M., Bryant, Carol A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29862961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170224
_version_ 1783328841401368576
author Aguado Loi, Claudia X.
Adegoke, Korede K.
Gwede, Clement K.
Sappenfield, William M.
Bryant, Carol A.
author_facet Aguado Loi, Claudia X.
Adegoke, Korede K.
Gwede, Clement K.
Sappenfield, William M.
Bryant, Carol A.
author_sort Aguado Loi, Claudia X.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of populations at risk of not being up to date on colorectal cancer screening in Florida. METHODS: We used Exhaustive Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection, a classification tree analysis, to identify subgroups not up to date with colorectal cancer screening using the 2013 Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The data set was restricted to adults aged 50 to 75 years (n = 14,756). RESULTS: Only 65.5% of the sample was up to date on colorectal cancer screening. Having no insurance and having a primary care provider were the most significant predictors of not being up to date on screening. The highest risk subgroups were 1) respondents with no insurance and no primary care provider, regardless of their employment status (screening rate, 12.1%–23.7%); 2) respondents with no insurance but had a primary care provider and were employed (screening rate, 32.3%); and 3) respondents with insurance, who were younger than 55 years, and who were current smokers (screening rate, 42.0%). CONCLUSION: Some populations in Florida are at high risk for not being up to date on colorectal cancer screening. To achieve Healthy People 2020 goals, interventions may need to be further tailored to target these subgroups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5985900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59859002018-06-13 Florida Populations Most at Risk of Not Being Up to Date With Colorectal Cancer Screening Aguado Loi, Claudia X. Adegoke, Korede K. Gwede, Clement K. Sappenfield, William M. Bryant, Carol A. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of populations at risk of not being up to date on colorectal cancer screening in Florida. METHODS: We used Exhaustive Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection, a classification tree analysis, to identify subgroups not up to date with colorectal cancer screening using the 2013 Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The data set was restricted to adults aged 50 to 75 years (n = 14,756). RESULTS: Only 65.5% of the sample was up to date on colorectal cancer screening. Having no insurance and having a primary care provider were the most significant predictors of not being up to date on screening. The highest risk subgroups were 1) respondents with no insurance and no primary care provider, regardless of their employment status (screening rate, 12.1%–23.7%); 2) respondents with no insurance but had a primary care provider and were employed (screening rate, 32.3%); and 3) respondents with insurance, who were younger than 55 years, and who were current smokers (screening rate, 42.0%). CONCLUSION: Some populations in Florida are at high risk for not being up to date on colorectal cancer screening. To achieve Healthy People 2020 goals, interventions may need to be further tailored to target these subgroups. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5985900/ /pubmed/29862961 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170224 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Aguado Loi, Claudia X.
Adegoke, Korede K.
Gwede, Clement K.
Sappenfield, William M.
Bryant, Carol A.
Florida Populations Most at Risk of Not Being Up to Date With Colorectal Cancer Screening
title Florida Populations Most at Risk of Not Being Up to Date With Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_full Florida Populations Most at Risk of Not Being Up to Date With Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_fullStr Florida Populations Most at Risk of Not Being Up to Date With Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_full_unstemmed Florida Populations Most at Risk of Not Being Up to Date With Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_short Florida Populations Most at Risk of Not Being Up to Date With Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_sort florida populations most at risk of not being up to date with colorectal cancer screening
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29862961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170224
work_keys_str_mv AT aguadoloiclaudiax floridapopulationsmostatriskofnotbeinguptodatewithcolorectalcancerscreening
AT adegokekoredek floridapopulationsmostatriskofnotbeinguptodatewithcolorectalcancerscreening
AT gwedeclementk floridapopulationsmostatriskofnotbeinguptodatewithcolorectalcancerscreening
AT sappenfieldwilliamm floridapopulationsmostatriskofnotbeinguptodatewithcolorectalcancerscreening
AT bryantcarola floridapopulationsmostatriskofnotbeinguptodatewithcolorectalcancerscreening