Cargando…
Mammography Screening 2.0 – How Can Risk-Adapted Screening be Implemented in Clinical Practice?: Results of a Focus Group Discussion with Experts in the RISIKOLOTSE.DE Project
INTRODUCTION: The mammography screening programme has been the subject of criticism for some time. Invitation to take part is currently based only on the risk factors of age and female sex, whereby women with an above-average risk are screened too seldom and women with a low risk are possibly screen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29880986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0603-4314 |
_version_ | 1783328951383359488 |
---|---|
author | Fürst, Nicole Kiechle, Marion Strahwald, Brigitte Quante, Anne S. |
author_facet | Fürst, Nicole Kiechle, Marion Strahwald, Brigitte Quante, Anne S. |
author_sort | Fürst, Nicole |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The mammography screening programme has been the subject of criticism for some time. Invitation to take part is currently based only on the risk factors of age and female sex, whereby women with an above-average risk are screened too seldom and women with a low risk are possibly screened too often. In future, an individualised risk assessment could make a risk-adapted procedure possible in breast cancer screening. In the RISIKOLOTSE.DE project, schemes are devised to calculate the individual breast cancer risk and evaluate the results. The aim is to assist doctors and screening participants in participatory decision-making. To gauge the baseline situation in the target groups, qualitative and quantitative surveys were conducted. METHOD: At the start of the project, a guideline-based focus group discussion was held with 15 doctors and representatives of the public health service. The transcript of this discussion was evaluated by means of a qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The participants assessed the concept of risk-adapted screening positively overall. At the same time, the majority of them were of the opinion that the results of individualised risk calculation can be understood and evaluated adequately only by doctors. The great communication requirement and lack of remuneration were given as practical obstacles to implementation. DISCUSSION: The suggestions and new ideas from the focus group ranged from administrative and regulatory changes to new forms of counselling and adaptable practice aids. An important indicator for the RISIKOLOTSE.DE conception and for planning future surveys was that risk calculation for mammography screening 2.0 was regarded as a purely medical function and that the concept of participatory decision-making played hardly any part in the discussion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5986567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59865672018-06-05 Mammography Screening 2.0 – How Can Risk-Adapted Screening be Implemented in Clinical Practice?: Results of a Focus Group Discussion with Experts in the RISIKOLOTSE.DE Project Fürst, Nicole Kiechle, Marion Strahwald, Brigitte Quante, Anne S. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd INTRODUCTION: The mammography screening programme has been the subject of criticism for some time. Invitation to take part is currently based only on the risk factors of age and female sex, whereby women with an above-average risk are screened too seldom and women with a low risk are possibly screened too often. In future, an individualised risk assessment could make a risk-adapted procedure possible in breast cancer screening. In the RISIKOLOTSE.DE project, schemes are devised to calculate the individual breast cancer risk and evaluate the results. The aim is to assist doctors and screening participants in participatory decision-making. To gauge the baseline situation in the target groups, qualitative and quantitative surveys were conducted. METHOD: At the start of the project, a guideline-based focus group discussion was held with 15 doctors and representatives of the public health service. The transcript of this discussion was evaluated by means of a qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The participants assessed the concept of risk-adapted screening positively overall. At the same time, the majority of them were of the opinion that the results of individualised risk calculation can be understood and evaluated adequately only by doctors. The great communication requirement and lack of remuneration were given as practical obstacles to implementation. DISCUSSION: The suggestions and new ideas from the focus group ranged from administrative and regulatory changes to new forms of counselling and adaptable practice aids. An important indicator for the RISIKOLOTSE.DE conception and for planning future surveys was that risk calculation for mammography screening 2.0 was regarded as a purely medical function and that the concept of participatory decision-making played hardly any part in the discussion. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-05 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5986567/ /pubmed/29880986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0603-4314 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Fürst, Nicole Kiechle, Marion Strahwald, Brigitte Quante, Anne S. Mammography Screening 2.0 – How Can Risk-Adapted Screening be Implemented in Clinical Practice?: Results of a Focus Group Discussion with Experts in the RISIKOLOTSE.DE Project |
title | Mammography Screening 2.0 – How Can Risk-Adapted Screening be Implemented in Clinical Practice?: Results of a Focus Group Discussion with Experts in the RISIKOLOTSE.DE Project |
title_full | Mammography Screening 2.0 – How Can Risk-Adapted Screening be Implemented in Clinical Practice?: Results of a Focus Group Discussion with Experts in the RISIKOLOTSE.DE Project |
title_fullStr | Mammography Screening 2.0 – How Can Risk-Adapted Screening be Implemented in Clinical Practice?: Results of a Focus Group Discussion with Experts in the RISIKOLOTSE.DE Project |
title_full_unstemmed | Mammography Screening 2.0 – How Can Risk-Adapted Screening be Implemented in Clinical Practice?: Results of a Focus Group Discussion with Experts in the RISIKOLOTSE.DE Project |
title_short | Mammography Screening 2.0 – How Can Risk-Adapted Screening be Implemented in Clinical Practice?: Results of a Focus Group Discussion with Experts in the RISIKOLOTSE.DE Project |
title_sort | mammography screening 2.0 – how can risk-adapted screening be implemented in clinical practice?: results of a focus group discussion with experts in the risikolotse.de project |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29880986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0603-4314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furstnicole mammographyscreening20howcanriskadaptedscreeningbeimplementedinclinicalpracticeresultsofafocusgroupdiscussionwithexpertsintherisikolotsedeproject AT kiechlemarion mammographyscreening20howcanriskadaptedscreeningbeimplementedinclinicalpracticeresultsofafocusgroupdiscussionwithexpertsintherisikolotsedeproject AT strahwaldbrigitte mammographyscreening20howcanriskadaptedscreeningbeimplementedinclinicalpracticeresultsofafocusgroupdiscussionwithexpertsintherisikolotsedeproject AT quanteannes mammographyscreening20howcanriskadaptedscreeningbeimplementedinclinicalpracticeresultsofafocusgroupdiscussionwithexpertsintherisikolotsedeproject |