Cargando…

Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) – Renaissance of a Method?

INTRODUCTION: For decades, conventional galactography was the only imaging technique capable of showing the mammary ducts. Today, diagnosis is based on a multimodal concept which combines high-resolution ultrasound with magnetic resonance (MR) mammography and ductoscopy/galactoscopy and has a sensit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger, Preuss, Caroline, Fasching, Peter A., Loehberg, Christian R., Lux, Michael P., Emons, Julius, Beckmann, Matthias W., Uder, Michael, Mueller-Schimpfle, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29880984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0594-2277
_version_ 1783328951648649216
author Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger
Preuss, Caroline
Fasching, Peter A.
Loehberg, Christian R.
Lux, Michael P.
Emons, Julius
Beckmann, Matthias W.
Uder, Michael
Mueller-Schimpfle, Markus
author_facet Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger
Preuss, Caroline
Fasching, Peter A.
Loehberg, Christian R.
Lux, Michael P.
Emons, Julius
Beckmann, Matthias W.
Uder, Michael
Mueller-Schimpfle, Markus
author_sort Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: For decades, conventional galactography was the only imaging technique capable of showing the mammary ducts. Today, diagnosis is based on a multimodal concept which combines high-resolution ultrasound with magnetic resonance (MR) mammography and ductoscopy/galactoscopy and has a sensitivity and specificity of up to 95%. This study used tomosynthesis in galactography for the first time and compared the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with this technique with the images created using the established method of ductal sonography. Both methods should be able to detect invasive breast cancers and their precursors such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as well as being able to identify benign findings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five patients with pathological nipple discharge were examined using ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis and the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with the latter method. Evaluation of the images created with the different imaging modalities was done by three investigators with varying levels of experience with complementary breast diagnostics (1, 5 and 15 years), and their evaluations were compared with the histological findings. RESULTS: All 3 investigators independently evaluated the images created with ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis, and generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. Their evaluations were compared with the histopathological assessment of the surgical specimens resected from the 5 patients. There was 1 case of invasive breast cancer, 2 cases with ductal carcinoma in situ and 2 cases with benign findings. All 3 investigators made more mistakes when they used the standard imaging technique of ductal sonography to diagnose suspicious lesions than when they used contrast-enhanced galactography with tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. CONCLUSION: This is the first time breast tomosynthesis was used in galactography (galactomosynthesis) to create digital 3-dimensional images of suspicious findings. When used together with the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, it could be a useful complementary procedure for the diagnosis of breast anomalies and could herald a renaissance of this method. Compared with high-resolution ductal ultrasound, the investigators achieved better results with contrast-enhanced galactography using tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, as confirmed by histopathological findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5986572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59865722018-06-05 Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) – Renaissance of a Method? Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger Preuss, Caroline Fasching, Peter A. Loehberg, Christian R. Lux, Michael P. Emons, Julius Beckmann, Matthias W. Uder, Michael Mueller-Schimpfle, Markus Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd INTRODUCTION: For decades, conventional galactography was the only imaging technique capable of showing the mammary ducts. Today, diagnosis is based on a multimodal concept which combines high-resolution ultrasound with magnetic resonance (MR) mammography and ductoscopy/galactoscopy and has a sensitivity and specificity of up to 95%. This study used tomosynthesis in galactography for the first time and compared the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with this technique with the images created using the established method of ductal sonography. Both methods should be able to detect invasive breast cancers and their precursors such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as well as being able to identify benign findings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five patients with pathological nipple discharge were examined using ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis and the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with the latter method. Evaluation of the images created with the different imaging modalities was done by three investigators with varying levels of experience with complementary breast diagnostics (1, 5 and 15 years), and their evaluations were compared with the histological findings. RESULTS: All 3 investigators independently evaluated the images created with ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis, and generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. Their evaluations were compared with the histopathological assessment of the surgical specimens resected from the 5 patients. There was 1 case of invasive breast cancer, 2 cases with ductal carcinoma in situ and 2 cases with benign findings. All 3 investigators made more mistakes when they used the standard imaging technique of ductal sonography to diagnose suspicious lesions than when they used contrast-enhanced galactography with tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. CONCLUSION: This is the first time breast tomosynthesis was used in galactography (galactomosynthesis) to create digital 3-dimensional images of suspicious findings. When used together with the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, it could be a useful complementary procedure for the diagnosis of breast anomalies and could herald a renaissance of this method. Compared with high-resolution ductal ultrasound, the investigators achieved better results with contrast-enhanced galactography using tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, as confirmed by histopathological findings. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-05 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5986572/ /pubmed/29880984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0594-2277 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Schulz-Wendtland, Rüdiger
Preuss, Caroline
Fasching, Peter A.
Loehberg, Christian R.
Lux, Michael P.
Emons, Julius
Beckmann, Matthias W.
Uder, Michael
Mueller-Schimpfle, Markus
Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) – Renaissance of a Method?
title Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) – Renaissance of a Method?
title_full Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) – Renaissance of a Method?
title_fullStr Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) – Renaissance of a Method?
title_full_unstemmed Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) – Renaissance of a Method?
title_short Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) – Renaissance of a Method?
title_sort galactography with tomosynthesis technique (galactomosynthesis) – renaissance of a method?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29880984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0594-2277
work_keys_str_mv AT schulzwendtlandrudiger galactographywithtomosynthesistechniquegalactomosynthesisrenaissanceofamethod
AT preusscaroline galactographywithtomosynthesistechniquegalactomosynthesisrenaissanceofamethod
AT faschingpetera galactographywithtomosynthesistechniquegalactomosynthesisrenaissanceofamethod
AT loehbergchristianr galactographywithtomosynthesistechniquegalactomosynthesisrenaissanceofamethod
AT luxmichaelp galactographywithtomosynthesistechniquegalactomosynthesisrenaissanceofamethod
AT emonsjulius galactographywithtomosynthesistechniquegalactomosynthesisrenaissanceofamethod
AT beckmannmatthiasw galactographywithtomosynthesistechniquegalactomosynthesisrenaissanceofamethod
AT udermichael galactographywithtomosynthesistechniquegalactomosynthesisrenaissanceofamethod
AT muellerschimpflemarkus galactographywithtomosynthesistechniquegalactomosynthesisrenaissanceofamethod