Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of elemental formula in the early enteral nutrition management of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Although enteral nutrition has become one of the standard therapies for patients with acute pancreatitis, the optimal formulae for enteral nutrition have been under debate. Elemental formula is assumed to be suitable in the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis because it has les...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Endo, Akira, Shiraishi, Atsushi, Fushimi, Kiyohide, Murata, Kiyoshi, Otomo, Yasuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29869095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0414-6
_version_ 1783328967494729728
author Endo, Akira
Shiraishi, Atsushi
Fushimi, Kiyohide
Murata, Kiyoshi
Otomo, Yasuhiro
author_facet Endo, Akira
Shiraishi, Atsushi
Fushimi, Kiyohide
Murata, Kiyoshi
Otomo, Yasuhiro
author_sort Endo, Akira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although enteral nutrition has become one of the standard therapies for patients with acute pancreatitis, the optimal formulae for enteral nutrition have been under debate. Elemental formula is assumed to be suitable in the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis because it has less stimulating effects for exocrine secretions of the pancreas, simultaneously maintaining gut immunity; however, clinical studies corroborating this assumption have been scarce. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese national administrative database between 2010 and 2015. Patients with acute pancreatitis who received enteral feeding within 3 days of admission were identified and divided into two groups according to whether elemental formula was administered. We assessed the impact of elemental formula for the outcomes (primary, in-hospital mortality; secondary, development of sepsis, hospital-free days at 90 days, and total health-care costs) using a multivariate mixed-effect regression analysis and propensity score matching analysis adjusted by a well-validated case-mix adjustment model. Analysis for the subpopulation of patients with severe acute pancreatitis was also performed. RESULTS: Of 243,312 patients with acute pancreatitis, 948 patients were identified and classified into the elemental formula group (N = 382) and the control group (N = 566). No significant differences were observed for in-hospital mortality [10.2% in the elemental formula group vs. 11.0% in the control group; adjusted adds ratio (95% confidence interval; CI) = 0.94 (0.53–1.67)], sepsis development [5.0 vs. 7.1%; adjusted adds ratio (95% CI) = 0.66 (0.34–1.28)], mean hospital-free days [54 days vs. 51 days; adjusted difference (95% CI) = 2 days (− 2 to 5)], and mean total health-care costs [$29,360 vs. $34,214; adjusted difference (95% CI) = − $4250 (− 8643 to 141)]. Similar results were also observed in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our retrospective cohort study using a large-scale national database did not demonstrate the benefit of elemental formula compared to semi-elemental and polymeric formulae in patients with acute pancreatitis. Further assessment of alternative nutritional strategy is expected. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0414-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5986693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59866932018-06-13 Comparative effectiveness of elemental formula in the early enteral nutrition management of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study Endo, Akira Shiraishi, Atsushi Fushimi, Kiyohide Murata, Kiyoshi Otomo, Yasuhiro Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Although enteral nutrition has become one of the standard therapies for patients with acute pancreatitis, the optimal formulae for enteral nutrition have been under debate. Elemental formula is assumed to be suitable in the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis because it has less stimulating effects for exocrine secretions of the pancreas, simultaneously maintaining gut immunity; however, clinical studies corroborating this assumption have been scarce. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese national administrative database between 2010 and 2015. Patients with acute pancreatitis who received enteral feeding within 3 days of admission were identified and divided into two groups according to whether elemental formula was administered. We assessed the impact of elemental formula for the outcomes (primary, in-hospital mortality; secondary, development of sepsis, hospital-free days at 90 days, and total health-care costs) using a multivariate mixed-effect regression analysis and propensity score matching analysis adjusted by a well-validated case-mix adjustment model. Analysis for the subpopulation of patients with severe acute pancreatitis was also performed. RESULTS: Of 243,312 patients with acute pancreatitis, 948 patients were identified and classified into the elemental formula group (N = 382) and the control group (N = 566). No significant differences were observed for in-hospital mortality [10.2% in the elemental formula group vs. 11.0% in the control group; adjusted adds ratio (95% confidence interval; CI) = 0.94 (0.53–1.67)], sepsis development [5.0 vs. 7.1%; adjusted adds ratio (95% CI) = 0.66 (0.34–1.28)], mean hospital-free days [54 days vs. 51 days; adjusted difference (95% CI) = 2 days (− 2 to 5)], and mean total health-care costs [$29,360 vs. $34,214; adjusted difference (95% CI) = − $4250 (− 8643 to 141)]. Similar results were also observed in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our retrospective cohort study using a large-scale national database did not demonstrate the benefit of elemental formula compared to semi-elemental and polymeric formulae in patients with acute pancreatitis. Further assessment of alternative nutritional strategy is expected. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0414-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5986693/ /pubmed/29869095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0414-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Endo, Akira
Shiraishi, Atsushi
Fushimi, Kiyohide
Murata, Kiyoshi
Otomo, Yasuhiro
Comparative effectiveness of elemental formula in the early enteral nutrition management of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study
title Comparative effectiveness of elemental formula in the early enteral nutrition management of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Comparative effectiveness of elemental formula in the early enteral nutrition management of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of elemental formula in the early enteral nutrition management of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of elemental formula in the early enteral nutrition management of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Comparative effectiveness of elemental formula in the early enteral nutrition management of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparative effectiveness of elemental formula in the early enteral nutrition management of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29869095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0414-6
work_keys_str_mv AT endoakira comparativeeffectivenessofelementalformulaintheearlyenteralnutritionmanagementofacutepancreatitisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shiraishiatsushi comparativeeffectivenessofelementalformulaintheearlyenteralnutritionmanagementofacutepancreatitisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT fushimikiyohide comparativeeffectivenessofelementalformulaintheearlyenteralnutritionmanagementofacutepancreatitisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT muratakiyoshi comparativeeffectivenessofelementalformulaintheearlyenteralnutritionmanagementofacutepancreatitisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT otomoyasuhiro comparativeeffectivenessofelementalformulaintheearlyenteralnutritionmanagementofacutepancreatitisaretrospectivecohortstudy