Cargando…

The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation

This study assessed the effect of interval duration on the direction and magnitude of changes in cortical excitability and inhibition when applying repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over motor cortex. 15 participants received three different iTBS conditions on separate d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tse, Nga Yan, Goldsworthy, Mitchell R., Ridding, Michael C., Coxon, James P., Fitzgerald, Paul B., Fornito, Alex, Rogasch, Nigel C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29867191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26791-w
_version_ 1783328972741804032
author Tse, Nga Yan
Goldsworthy, Mitchell R.
Ridding, Michael C.
Coxon, James P.
Fitzgerald, Paul B.
Fornito, Alex
Rogasch, Nigel C.
author_facet Tse, Nga Yan
Goldsworthy, Mitchell R.
Ridding, Michael C.
Coxon, James P.
Fitzgerald, Paul B.
Fornito, Alex
Rogasch, Nigel C.
author_sort Tse, Nga Yan
collection PubMed
description This study assessed the effect of interval duration on the direction and magnitude of changes in cortical excitability and inhibition when applying repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over motor cortex. 15 participants received three different iTBS conditions on separate days: single iTBS; repeated iTBS with a 5 minute interval (iTBS-5-iTBS); and with a 15 minute interval (iTBS-15-iTBS). Changes in cortical excitability and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) were assessed via motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) before and up to 60 mins following stimulation. iTBS-15-iTBS increased MEP amplitude for up to 60 mins post stimulation, whereas iTBS-5-iTBS decreased MEP amplitude. In contrast, MEP amplitude was not altered by single iTBS. Despite the group level findings, only 53% of individuals showed facilitated MEPs following iTBS-15-iTBS, and only 40% inhibited MEPs following iTBS-5-iTBS. Modulation of SICI did not differ between conditions. These results suggest interval duration between spaced iTBS plays an important role in determining the direction of plasticity on excitatory, but not inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex. While repeated iTBS can increase the magnitude of MEP facilitation/inhibition in some individuals compared to single iTBS, the response to repeated iTBS appears variable between individuals in this small sample.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5986739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59867392018-06-07 The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation Tse, Nga Yan Goldsworthy, Mitchell R. Ridding, Michael C. Coxon, James P. Fitzgerald, Paul B. Fornito, Alex Rogasch, Nigel C. Sci Rep Article This study assessed the effect of interval duration on the direction and magnitude of changes in cortical excitability and inhibition when applying repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over motor cortex. 15 participants received three different iTBS conditions on separate days: single iTBS; repeated iTBS with a 5 minute interval (iTBS-5-iTBS); and with a 15 minute interval (iTBS-15-iTBS). Changes in cortical excitability and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) were assessed via motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) before and up to 60 mins following stimulation. iTBS-15-iTBS increased MEP amplitude for up to 60 mins post stimulation, whereas iTBS-5-iTBS decreased MEP amplitude. In contrast, MEP amplitude was not altered by single iTBS. Despite the group level findings, only 53% of individuals showed facilitated MEPs following iTBS-15-iTBS, and only 40% inhibited MEPs following iTBS-5-iTBS. Modulation of SICI did not differ between conditions. These results suggest interval duration between spaced iTBS plays an important role in determining the direction of plasticity on excitatory, but not inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex. While repeated iTBS can increase the magnitude of MEP facilitation/inhibition in some individuals compared to single iTBS, the response to repeated iTBS appears variable between individuals in this small sample. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5986739/ /pubmed/29867191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26791-w Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tse, Nga Yan
Goldsworthy, Mitchell R.
Ridding, Michael C.
Coxon, James P.
Fitzgerald, Paul B.
Fornito, Alex
Rogasch, Nigel C.
The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation
title The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation
title_full The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation
title_fullStr The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation
title_full_unstemmed The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation
title_short The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation
title_sort effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29867191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26791-w
work_keys_str_mv AT tsengayan theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT goldsworthymitchellr theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT riddingmichaelc theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT coxonjamesp theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT fitzgeraldpaulb theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT fornitoalex theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT rogaschnigelc theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT tsengayan effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT goldsworthymitchellr effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT riddingmichaelc effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT coxonjamesp effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT fitzgeraldpaulb effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT fornitoalex effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation
AT rogaschnigelc effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation