Cargando…
The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation
This study assessed the effect of interval duration on the direction and magnitude of changes in cortical excitability and inhibition when applying repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over motor cortex. 15 participants received three different iTBS conditions on separate d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29867191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26791-w |
_version_ | 1783328972741804032 |
---|---|
author | Tse, Nga Yan Goldsworthy, Mitchell R. Ridding, Michael C. Coxon, James P. Fitzgerald, Paul B. Fornito, Alex Rogasch, Nigel C. |
author_facet | Tse, Nga Yan Goldsworthy, Mitchell R. Ridding, Michael C. Coxon, James P. Fitzgerald, Paul B. Fornito, Alex Rogasch, Nigel C. |
author_sort | Tse, Nga Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study assessed the effect of interval duration on the direction and magnitude of changes in cortical excitability and inhibition when applying repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over motor cortex. 15 participants received three different iTBS conditions on separate days: single iTBS; repeated iTBS with a 5 minute interval (iTBS-5-iTBS); and with a 15 minute interval (iTBS-15-iTBS). Changes in cortical excitability and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) were assessed via motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) before and up to 60 mins following stimulation. iTBS-15-iTBS increased MEP amplitude for up to 60 mins post stimulation, whereas iTBS-5-iTBS decreased MEP amplitude. In contrast, MEP amplitude was not altered by single iTBS. Despite the group level findings, only 53% of individuals showed facilitated MEPs following iTBS-15-iTBS, and only 40% inhibited MEPs following iTBS-5-iTBS. Modulation of SICI did not differ between conditions. These results suggest interval duration between spaced iTBS plays an important role in determining the direction of plasticity on excitatory, but not inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex. While repeated iTBS can increase the magnitude of MEP facilitation/inhibition in some individuals compared to single iTBS, the response to repeated iTBS appears variable between individuals in this small sample. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5986739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59867392018-06-07 The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation Tse, Nga Yan Goldsworthy, Mitchell R. Ridding, Michael C. Coxon, James P. Fitzgerald, Paul B. Fornito, Alex Rogasch, Nigel C. Sci Rep Article This study assessed the effect of interval duration on the direction and magnitude of changes in cortical excitability and inhibition when applying repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over motor cortex. 15 participants received three different iTBS conditions on separate days: single iTBS; repeated iTBS with a 5 minute interval (iTBS-5-iTBS); and with a 15 minute interval (iTBS-15-iTBS). Changes in cortical excitability and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) were assessed via motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) before and up to 60 mins following stimulation. iTBS-15-iTBS increased MEP amplitude for up to 60 mins post stimulation, whereas iTBS-5-iTBS decreased MEP amplitude. In contrast, MEP amplitude was not altered by single iTBS. Despite the group level findings, only 53% of individuals showed facilitated MEPs following iTBS-15-iTBS, and only 40% inhibited MEPs following iTBS-5-iTBS. Modulation of SICI did not differ between conditions. These results suggest interval duration between spaced iTBS plays an important role in determining the direction of plasticity on excitatory, but not inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex. While repeated iTBS can increase the magnitude of MEP facilitation/inhibition in some individuals compared to single iTBS, the response to repeated iTBS appears variable between individuals in this small sample. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5986739/ /pubmed/29867191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26791-w Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Tse, Nga Yan Goldsworthy, Mitchell R. Ridding, Michael C. Coxon, James P. Fitzgerald, Paul B. Fornito, Alex Rogasch, Nigel C. The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation |
title | The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation |
title_full | The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation |
title_fullStr | The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation |
title_short | The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation |
title_sort | effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29867191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26791-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsengayan theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT goldsworthymitchellr theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT riddingmichaelc theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT coxonjamesp theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT fitzgeraldpaulb theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT fornitoalex theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT rogaschnigelc theeffectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT tsengayan effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT goldsworthymitchellr effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT riddingmichaelc effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT coxonjamesp effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT fitzgeraldpaulb effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT fornitoalex effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation AT rogaschnigelc effectofstimulationintervalonplasticityfollowingrepeatedblocksofintermittentthetaburststimulation |