Cargando…
When A+B < A: Cognitive Bias in Experts’ Judgment of Environmental Impact
When ‘environmentally friendly’ items are added to a set of conventional items, people report that the total set will have a lower environmental impact even though the actual impact increases. One hypothesis is that this “negative footprint illusion” arises because people, who are susceptible to the...
Autores principales: | Holmgren, Mattias, Kabanshi, Alan, Marsh, John E., Sörqvist, Patrik |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5987038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29896142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00823 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The negative footprint illusion in environmental impact estimates: Methodological considerations
por: Sörqvist, Patrik, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Moral spillover in carbon offset judgments
por: Sörqvist, Patrik, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Biased Estimates of Environmental Impact in the Negative Footprint Illusion: The Nature of Individual Variation
por: Threadgold, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Psychological Restoration Can Depend on Stimulus-Source Attribution: A Challenge for the Evolutionary Account?
por: Haga, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Grand Challenges in Environmental Psychology
por: Sörqvist, Patrik
Publicado: (2016)