Cargando…

Abouchement séparé du canal pancréatique principale et du cholédoque: est- il synonyme de cholangiographie rétrograde par voie endoscopique facile?

This study focused on endoscopic examination of a prominent papilla which showed two separate orifices revealing separate entrance of the main pancreatic duct and of the common bile duct (A). This was the most rare anatomoendoscopic variation, accounting for only 10% of retrograde cholangiopancreato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Benatta, Mohammed Amine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The African Field Epidemiology Network 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5987102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875936
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.29.55.14597
Descripción
Sumario:This study focused on endoscopic examination of a prominent papilla which showed two separate orifices revealing separate entrance of the main pancreatic duct and of the common bile duct (A). This was the most rare anatomoendoscopic variation, accounting for only 10% of retrograde cholangiopancreatographies using endoscopic approach (ERCP). However, it facilitated selective biliary catheterization (SBC) in our patient, as one might have expected. Papilla had a pseudo polypoid appearance and a biliary orifice (BO) at the right angle toward the duodenal wall; hence this was a more difficult approach than that via the pancreatic orifice (PO) which, on the other hand, required undesired pancreatic catheterization (B). As SBC was the approach we decided to adopt, the special techniques to consider in this particular case were: transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS) alone or TPS after implantation of a pancreatic stent (PS). We opted for the second technique (STP + PS) and we noticed that the implantation of a PS resulted in better BO visualization (C). We could perform SBC without recourse to TPS. In this specific case, as in other cases of difficult SBC in our practice, PS has proven effectiveness.