Cargando…

Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement

OBJECTIVES: The primary stability of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OUKR) relies on interference fit (or press fit). Insufficient interference may cause implant loosening, whilst excessive interference could cause bone damage and fracture. The aim of this study was to ident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campi, S., Mellon, S. J., Ridley, D., Foulke, B., Dodd, C. A. F., Pandit, H. G., Murray, D. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5987689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0193.R1
_version_ 1783329168757358592
author Campi, S.
Mellon, S. J.
Ridley, D.
Foulke, B.
Dodd, C. A. F.
Pandit, H. G.
Murray, D. W.
author_facet Campi, S.
Mellon, S. J.
Ridley, D.
Foulke, B.
Dodd, C. A. F.
Pandit, H. G.
Murray, D. W.
author_sort Campi, S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The primary stability of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OUKR) relies on interference fit (or press fit). Insufficient interference may cause implant loosening, whilst excessive interference could cause bone damage and fracture. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal interference fit by measuring the force required to seat the tibial component of the cementless OUKR (push-in force) and the force required to remove the component (pull-out force). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six cementless OUKR tibial components were implanted in 12 new slots prepared on blocks of solid polyurethane foam (20 pounds per cubic foot (PCF), Sawbones, Malmo, Sweden) with a range of interference of 0.1 mm to 1.9 mm using a Dartec materials testing machine HC10 (Zwick Ltd, Herefordshire, United Kingdom) . The experiment was repeated with cellular polyurethane foam (15 PCF), which is a more porous analogue for trabecular bone. RESULTS: The push-in force progressively increased with increasing interference. The pull-out force was related in a non-linear fashion to interference, decreasing with higher interference. Compared with the current nominal interference, a lower interference would reduce the push-in forces by up to 45% (p < 0.001 One way ANOVA) ensuring comparable (or improved) pull-out forces (p > 0.05 Bonferroni post hoc test). With the more porous bone analogue, although the forces were lower, the relationship between interference and push-in and pull-out force were similar. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that decreasing the interference fit of the tibial component of the cementless OUKR reduces the push-in force and can increase the pull-out force. An optimal interference fit may both improve primary fixation and decrease the risk of fracture. Cite this article: S. Campi, S. J. Mellon, D. Ridley, B. Foulke, C. A. F. Dodd, H. G. Pandit, D. W. Murray. Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:226–231. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0193.R1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5987689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59876892018-06-19 Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Campi, S. Mellon, S. J. Ridley, D. Foulke, B. Dodd, C. A. F. Pandit, H. G. Murray, D. W. Bone Joint Res Knee OBJECTIVES: The primary stability of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OUKR) relies on interference fit (or press fit). Insufficient interference may cause implant loosening, whilst excessive interference could cause bone damage and fracture. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal interference fit by measuring the force required to seat the tibial component of the cementless OUKR (push-in force) and the force required to remove the component (pull-out force). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six cementless OUKR tibial components were implanted in 12 new slots prepared on blocks of solid polyurethane foam (20 pounds per cubic foot (PCF), Sawbones, Malmo, Sweden) with a range of interference of 0.1 mm to 1.9 mm using a Dartec materials testing machine HC10 (Zwick Ltd, Herefordshire, United Kingdom) . The experiment was repeated with cellular polyurethane foam (15 PCF), which is a more porous analogue for trabecular bone. RESULTS: The push-in force progressively increased with increasing interference. The pull-out force was related in a non-linear fashion to interference, decreasing with higher interference. Compared with the current nominal interference, a lower interference would reduce the push-in forces by up to 45% (p < 0.001 One way ANOVA) ensuring comparable (or improved) pull-out forces (p > 0.05 Bonferroni post hoc test). With the more porous bone analogue, although the forces were lower, the relationship between interference and push-in and pull-out force were similar. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that decreasing the interference fit of the tibial component of the cementless OUKR reduces the push-in force and can increase the pull-out force. An optimal interference fit may both improve primary fixation and decrease the risk of fracture. Cite this article: S. Campi, S. J. Mellon, D. Ridley, B. Foulke, C. A. F. Dodd, H. G. Pandit, D. W. Murray. Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:226–231. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0193.R1. 2018-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5987689/ /pubmed/29922440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0193.R1 Text en © 2018 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Knee
Campi, S.
Mellon, S. J.
Ridley, D.
Foulke, B.
Dodd, C. A. F.
Pandit, H. G.
Murray, D. W.
Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
title Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
title_full Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
title_fullStr Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
title_full_unstemmed Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
title_short Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
title_sort optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless oxford unicompartmental knee replacement
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5987689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0193.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT campis optimalinterferenceofthetibialcomponentofthecementlessoxfordunicompartmentalkneereplacement
AT mellonsj optimalinterferenceofthetibialcomponentofthecementlessoxfordunicompartmentalkneereplacement
AT ridleyd optimalinterferenceofthetibialcomponentofthecementlessoxfordunicompartmentalkneereplacement
AT foulkeb optimalinterferenceofthetibialcomponentofthecementlessoxfordunicompartmentalkneereplacement
AT doddcaf optimalinterferenceofthetibialcomponentofthecementlessoxfordunicompartmentalkneereplacement
AT pandithg optimalinterferenceofthetibialcomponentofthecementlessoxfordunicompartmentalkneereplacement
AT murraydw optimalinterferenceofthetibialcomponentofthecementlessoxfordunicompartmentalkneereplacement