Cargando…

Diagnostic value of structural and diffusion imaging measures in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES: Many studies have attempted to discriminate patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls by machine learning using structural or functional MRI. We included both structural and diffusion MRI (dMRI) and performed random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) in this study. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jungsun, Chon, Myong-Wuk, Kim, Harin, Rathi, Yogesh, Bouix, Sylvain, Shenton, Martha E., Kubicki, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5987843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.007
_version_ 1783329190936838144
author Lee, Jungsun
Chon, Myong-Wuk
Kim, Harin
Rathi, Yogesh
Bouix, Sylvain
Shenton, Martha E.
Kubicki, Marek
author_facet Lee, Jungsun
Chon, Myong-Wuk
Kim, Harin
Rathi, Yogesh
Bouix, Sylvain
Shenton, Martha E.
Kubicki, Marek
author_sort Lee, Jungsun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Many studies have attempted to discriminate patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls by machine learning using structural or functional MRI. We included both structural and diffusion MRI (dMRI) and performed random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) in this study. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of classifying schizophrenia using RF method and SVM with 504 features (volume and/or fractional anisotropy and trace) from 184 brain regions. We enrolled 47 patients and 23 age- and sex-matched healthy controls and resampled our data into a balanced dataset using a Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique method. We randomly permuted the classification of all participants as a patient or healthy control 100 times and ran the RF and SVM with leave one out cross validation for each permutation. We then compared the sensitivity and specificity of the original dataset and the permuted dataset. RESULTS: Classification using RF with 504 features showed a significantly higher rate of performance compared to classification by chance: sensitivity (87.6% vs. 47.0%) and specificity (95.9 vs. 48.4%) performed by RF, sensitivity (89.5% vs. 48.0%) and specificity (94.5% vs. 47.1%) performed by SVM. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning using RF and SVM with both volume and diffusion measures can discriminate patients with schizophrenia with a high degree of performance. Further replications are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5987843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59878432018-06-06 Diagnostic value of structural and diffusion imaging measures in schizophrenia Lee, Jungsun Chon, Myong-Wuk Kim, Harin Rathi, Yogesh Bouix, Sylvain Shenton, Martha E. Kubicki, Marek Neuroimage Clin Regular Article OBJECTIVES: Many studies have attempted to discriminate patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls by machine learning using structural or functional MRI. We included both structural and diffusion MRI (dMRI) and performed random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) in this study. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of classifying schizophrenia using RF method and SVM with 504 features (volume and/or fractional anisotropy and trace) from 184 brain regions. We enrolled 47 patients and 23 age- and sex-matched healthy controls and resampled our data into a balanced dataset using a Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique method. We randomly permuted the classification of all participants as a patient or healthy control 100 times and ran the RF and SVM with leave one out cross validation for each permutation. We then compared the sensitivity and specificity of the original dataset and the permuted dataset. RESULTS: Classification using RF with 504 features showed a significantly higher rate of performance compared to classification by chance: sensitivity (87.6% vs. 47.0%) and specificity (95.9 vs. 48.4%) performed by RF, sensitivity (89.5% vs. 48.0%) and specificity (94.5% vs. 47.1%) performed by SVM. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning using RF and SVM with both volume and diffusion measures can discriminate patients with schizophrenia with a high degree of performance. Further replications are required. Elsevier 2018-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5987843/ /pubmed/29876254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.007 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Lee, Jungsun
Chon, Myong-Wuk
Kim, Harin
Rathi, Yogesh
Bouix, Sylvain
Shenton, Martha E.
Kubicki, Marek
Diagnostic value of structural and diffusion imaging measures in schizophrenia
title Diagnostic value of structural and diffusion imaging measures in schizophrenia
title_full Diagnostic value of structural and diffusion imaging measures in schizophrenia
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of structural and diffusion imaging measures in schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of structural and diffusion imaging measures in schizophrenia
title_short Diagnostic value of structural and diffusion imaging measures in schizophrenia
title_sort diagnostic value of structural and diffusion imaging measures in schizophrenia
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5987843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.007
work_keys_str_mv AT leejungsun diagnosticvalueofstructuralanddiffusionimagingmeasuresinschizophrenia
AT chonmyongwuk diagnosticvalueofstructuralanddiffusionimagingmeasuresinschizophrenia
AT kimharin diagnosticvalueofstructuralanddiffusionimagingmeasuresinschizophrenia
AT rathiyogesh diagnosticvalueofstructuralanddiffusionimagingmeasuresinschizophrenia
AT bouixsylvain diagnosticvalueofstructuralanddiffusionimagingmeasuresinschizophrenia
AT shentonmarthae diagnosticvalueofstructuralanddiffusionimagingmeasuresinschizophrenia
AT kubickimarek diagnosticvalueofstructuralanddiffusionimagingmeasuresinschizophrenia