Cargando…
Size–strain separation in diffraction line profile analysis
Separation of size and strain effects on diffraction line profiles has been studied in a round robin involving laboratory instruments and synchrotron radiation beamlines operating with different radiation, optics, detectors and experimental configurations. The studied sample, an extensively ball mil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29896061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600576718005411 |
_version_ | 1783329214785650688 |
---|---|
author | Scardi, P. Ermrich, M. Fitch, A. Huang, E-Wen Jardin, R. Kuzel, R. Leineweber, A. Mendoza Cuevas, A. Misture, S. T. Rebuffi, L. Schimpf, Christian |
author_facet | Scardi, P. Ermrich, M. Fitch, A. Huang, E-Wen Jardin, R. Kuzel, R. Leineweber, A. Mendoza Cuevas, A. Misture, S. T. Rebuffi, L. Schimpf, Christian |
author_sort | Scardi, P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Separation of size and strain effects on diffraction line profiles has been studied in a round robin involving laboratory instruments and synchrotron radiation beamlines operating with different radiation, optics, detectors and experimental configurations. The studied sample, an extensively ball milled iron alloy powder, provides an ideal test case, as domain size broadening and strain broadening are of comparable size. The high energy available at some synchrotron radiation beamlines provides the best conditions for an accurate analysis of the line profiles, as the size–strain separation clearly benefits from a large number of Bragg peaks in the pattern; high counts, reliable intensity values in low-absorption conditions, smooth background and data collection at different temperatures also support the possibility to include diffuse scattering in the analysis, for the most reliable assessment of the line broadening effect. However, results of the round robin show that good quality information on domain size distribution and microstrain can also be obtained using standard laboratory equipment, even when patterns include relatively few Bragg peaks, provided that the data are of good quality in terms of high counts and low and smooth background. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5988009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | International Union of Crystallography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59880092018-06-12 Size–strain separation in diffraction line profile analysis Scardi, P. Ermrich, M. Fitch, A. Huang, E-Wen Jardin, R. Kuzel, R. Leineweber, A. Mendoza Cuevas, A. Misture, S. T. Rebuffi, L. Schimpf, Christian J Appl Crystallogr Research Papers Separation of size and strain effects on diffraction line profiles has been studied in a round robin involving laboratory instruments and synchrotron radiation beamlines operating with different radiation, optics, detectors and experimental configurations. The studied sample, an extensively ball milled iron alloy powder, provides an ideal test case, as domain size broadening and strain broadening are of comparable size. The high energy available at some synchrotron radiation beamlines provides the best conditions for an accurate analysis of the line profiles, as the size–strain separation clearly benefits from a large number of Bragg peaks in the pattern; high counts, reliable intensity values in low-absorption conditions, smooth background and data collection at different temperatures also support the possibility to include diffuse scattering in the analysis, for the most reliable assessment of the line broadening effect. However, results of the round robin show that good quality information on domain size distribution and microstrain can also be obtained using standard laboratory equipment, even when patterns include relatively few Bragg peaks, provided that the data are of good quality in terms of high counts and low and smooth background. International Union of Crystallography 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5988009/ /pubmed/29896061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600576718005411 Text en © P. Scardi et al. 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Scardi, P. Ermrich, M. Fitch, A. Huang, E-Wen Jardin, R. Kuzel, R. Leineweber, A. Mendoza Cuevas, A. Misture, S. T. Rebuffi, L. Schimpf, Christian Size–strain separation in diffraction line profile analysis |
title | Size–strain separation in diffraction line profile analysis |
title_full | Size–strain separation in diffraction line profile analysis |
title_fullStr | Size–strain separation in diffraction line profile analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Size–strain separation in diffraction line profile analysis |
title_short | Size–strain separation in diffraction line profile analysis |
title_sort | size–strain separation in diffraction line profile analysis |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29896061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600576718005411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scardip sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis AT ermrichm sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis AT fitcha sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis AT huangewen sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis AT jardinr sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis AT kuzelr sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis AT leinewebera sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis AT mendozacuevasa sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis AT misturest sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis AT rebuffil sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis AT schimpfchristian sizestrainseparationindiffractionlineprofileanalysis |