Cargando…

Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the review was to determine the effectiveness of strategies to improve clinician provision of psychosocial distress screening and referral of patients with cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarter, Kristen, Britton, Ben, Baker, Amanda L, Halpin, Sean A, Beck, Alison K, Carter, Gregory, Wratten, Chris, Bauer, Judith, Forbes, Erin, Booth, Debbie, Wolfenden, Luke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29306881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017959
_version_ 1783329227092787200
author McCarter, Kristen
Britton, Ben
Baker, Amanda L
Halpin, Sean A
Beck, Alison K
Carter, Gregory
Wratten, Chris
Bauer, Judith
Forbes, Erin
Booth, Debbie
Wolfenden, Luke
author_facet McCarter, Kristen
Britton, Ben
Baker, Amanda L
Halpin, Sean A
Beck, Alison K
Carter, Gregory
Wratten, Chris
Bauer, Judith
Forbes, Erin
Booth, Debbie
Wolfenden, Luke
author_sort McCarter, Kristen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the review was to determine the effectiveness of strategies to improve clinician provision of psychosocial distress screening and referral of patients with cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)) were searched until July 2016. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Population: adult patients with cancer and clinical staff members. Intervention: any strategy that aimed to improve the rate of routine screening and referral for detected distress of patients with cancer. Comparison: no intervention controls, ‘usual’ practice or alternative interventions. Outcome: (primary) any measure of provision of screening and/or referral for distress, (secondary) psychosocial distress, unintended adverse effects. Design: trials with or without a temporal comparison group, including randomised and non-randomised trials, and uncontrolled pre–post studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data. Heterogeneity across studies precluded quantitative assessment via meta-analysis and so a narrative synthesis of the results is presented. RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies were set in oncology clinics or departments and used multiple implementation strategies. Using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation, the overall rating of the certainty of the body of evidence reported in this review was assessed as very low. Three studies received a methodological quality rating of weak and two studies received a rating of moderate. Only one of the five studies reported a significant improvement in referrals. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified five studies of predominantly poor quality examining the effectiveness of strategies to improve the routine implementation of distress screening and referral for patients with cancer. Future research using robust research designs, including randomised assignment, are needed to identify effective support strategies to maximise the potential for successful implementation of distress screening and referral for patients with cancer. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015017518.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5988073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59880732018-06-07 Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review McCarter, Kristen Britton, Ben Baker, Amanda L Halpin, Sean A Beck, Alison K Carter, Gregory Wratten, Chris Bauer, Judith Forbes, Erin Booth, Debbie Wolfenden, Luke BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the review was to determine the effectiveness of strategies to improve clinician provision of psychosocial distress screening and referral of patients with cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)) were searched until July 2016. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Population: adult patients with cancer and clinical staff members. Intervention: any strategy that aimed to improve the rate of routine screening and referral for detected distress of patients with cancer. Comparison: no intervention controls, ‘usual’ practice or alternative interventions. Outcome: (primary) any measure of provision of screening and/or referral for distress, (secondary) psychosocial distress, unintended adverse effects. Design: trials with or without a temporal comparison group, including randomised and non-randomised trials, and uncontrolled pre–post studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data. Heterogeneity across studies precluded quantitative assessment via meta-analysis and so a narrative synthesis of the results is presented. RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies were set in oncology clinics or departments and used multiple implementation strategies. Using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation, the overall rating of the certainty of the body of evidence reported in this review was assessed as very low. Three studies received a methodological quality rating of weak and two studies received a rating of moderate. Only one of the five studies reported a significant improvement in referrals. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified five studies of predominantly poor quality examining the effectiveness of strategies to improve the routine implementation of distress screening and referral for patients with cancer. Future research using robust research designs, including randomised assignment, are needed to identify effective support strategies to maximise the potential for successful implementation of distress screening and referral for patients with cancer. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015017518. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5988073/ /pubmed/29306881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017959 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
McCarter, Kristen
Britton, Ben
Baker, Amanda L
Halpin, Sean A
Beck, Alison K
Carter, Gregory
Wratten, Chris
Bauer, Judith
Forbes, Erin
Booth, Debbie
Wolfenden, Luke
Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review
title Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review
title_full Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review
title_fullStr Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review
title_short Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review
title_sort interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29306881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017959
work_keys_str_mv AT mccarterkristen interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview
AT brittonben interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview
AT bakeramandal interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview
AT halpinseana interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview
AT beckalisonk interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview
AT cartergregory interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview
AT wrattenchris interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview
AT bauerjudith interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview
AT forbeserin interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview
AT boothdebbie interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview
AT wolfendenluke interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerforpsychosocialdistresssystematicreview