Cargando…

Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study

INTRODUCTION: Millions of acute care hospital patients need a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) each year. However, up to half of PIVCs remain in situ when not being used, and 30%–50% of intravenous (IV) catheters develop complications or stop working before treatment is finished, requiring the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ray-Barruel, Gillian, Cooke, Marie, Mitchell, Marion, Chopra, Vineet, Rickard, Claire M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29866733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021290
_version_ 1783329242305527808
author Ray-Barruel, Gillian
Cooke, Marie
Mitchell, Marion
Chopra, Vineet
Rickard, Claire M
author_facet Ray-Barruel, Gillian
Cooke, Marie
Mitchell, Marion
Chopra, Vineet
Rickard, Claire M
author_sort Ray-Barruel, Gillian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Millions of acute care hospital patients need a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) each year. However, up to half of PIVCs remain in situ when not being used, and 30%–50% of intravenous (IV) catheters develop complications or stop working before treatment is finished, requiring the insertion of a new device. Improved assessment could prompt timely removal of redundant catheters and prevent IV complications. This study aims to validate an evidence-based PIVC assessment and decision-making tool called I-DECIDED and evaluate the effect of implementing this tool into acute hospital clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol outlines a prospective, multicentre, mixed-methods study using an interrupted time-series (multiple measures preintervention and postintervention) implementation at three Australian hospitals between August 2017 and July 2018. The study will examine the effectiveness of the I-DECIDED assessment and decision-making tool in clinical practice on prompting timely PIVC removal and early detection of complications. Primary outcomes are prevalence of redundant PIVCs (defined as device in situ without a clear purpose), IV complications (occlusion, dislodgement, infiltration, extravasation and phlebitis) and substandard dressings (loose, lifting, moist or soiled); device utilisation ratios; and primary bloodstream infection rates. Secondary outcomes including staff barriers and enablers to PIVC assessment and removal, patient participation, documentation of PIVC assessment and decisions taken to continue or remove the PIVC will be recorded. Using the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, we will undertake staff focus groups, bedside patient interviews and PIVC assessments and chart audits. Patients aged 18 years or more with a PIVC will be eligible for inclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval from Queensland Health (HREC/17/QPCH/47), Griffith University (Ref No. 2017/152) and St Vincent’s Health and Aged Care Human Research and Ethics Committee (Ref No. 17/28). Results will be published. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR: 12617000067370; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5988165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59881652018-06-07 Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study Ray-Barruel, Gillian Cooke, Marie Mitchell, Marion Chopra, Vineet Rickard, Claire M BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Millions of acute care hospital patients need a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) each year. However, up to half of PIVCs remain in situ when not being used, and 30%–50% of intravenous (IV) catheters develop complications or stop working before treatment is finished, requiring the insertion of a new device. Improved assessment could prompt timely removal of redundant catheters and prevent IV complications. This study aims to validate an evidence-based PIVC assessment and decision-making tool called I-DECIDED and evaluate the effect of implementing this tool into acute hospital clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol outlines a prospective, multicentre, mixed-methods study using an interrupted time-series (multiple measures preintervention and postintervention) implementation at three Australian hospitals between August 2017 and July 2018. The study will examine the effectiveness of the I-DECIDED assessment and decision-making tool in clinical practice on prompting timely PIVC removal and early detection of complications. Primary outcomes are prevalence of redundant PIVCs (defined as device in situ without a clear purpose), IV complications (occlusion, dislodgement, infiltration, extravasation and phlebitis) and substandard dressings (loose, lifting, moist or soiled); device utilisation ratios; and primary bloodstream infection rates. Secondary outcomes including staff barriers and enablers to PIVC assessment and removal, patient participation, documentation of PIVC assessment and decisions taken to continue or remove the PIVC will be recorded. Using the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, we will undertake staff focus groups, bedside patient interviews and PIVC assessments and chart audits. Patients aged 18 years or more with a PIVC will be eligible for inclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval from Queensland Health (HREC/17/QPCH/47), Griffith University (Ref No. 2017/152) and St Vincent’s Health and Aged Care Human Research and Ethics Committee (Ref No. 17/28). Results will be published. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR: 12617000067370; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5988165/ /pubmed/29866733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021290 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Methods
Ray-Barruel, Gillian
Cooke, Marie
Mitchell, Marion
Chopra, Vineet
Rickard, Claire M
Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study
title Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study
title_full Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study
title_fullStr Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study
title_full_unstemmed Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study
title_short Implementing the I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study
title_sort implementing the i-decided clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: protocol for an interrupted time-series study
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29866733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021290
work_keys_str_mv AT raybarruelgillian implementingtheidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalprotocolforaninterruptedtimeseriesstudy
AT cookemarie implementingtheidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalprotocolforaninterruptedtimeseriesstudy
AT mitchellmarion implementingtheidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalprotocolforaninterruptedtimeseriesstudy
AT chopravineet implementingtheidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalprotocolforaninterruptedtimeseriesstudy
AT rickardclairem implementingtheidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalprotocolforaninterruptedtimeseriesstudy