Cargando…

Spontaneous brain network activity: Analysis of its temporal complexity

The brain operates in a complex way. The temporal complexity underlying macroscopic and spontaneous brain network activity is still to be understood. In this study, we explored the brain’s complexity by combining functional connectivity, graph theory, and entropy analyses in 25 healthy people using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedersen, Mangor, Omidvarnia, Amir, Walz, Jennifer M., Zalesky, Andrew, Jackson, Graeme D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29911666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/NETN_a_00006
_version_ 1783329273879199744
author Pedersen, Mangor
Omidvarnia, Amir
Walz, Jennifer M.
Zalesky, Andrew
Jackson, Graeme D.
author_facet Pedersen, Mangor
Omidvarnia, Amir
Walz, Jennifer M.
Zalesky, Andrew
Jackson, Graeme D.
author_sort Pedersen, Mangor
collection PubMed
description The brain operates in a complex way. The temporal complexity underlying macroscopic and spontaneous brain network activity is still to be understood. In this study, we explored the brain’s complexity by combining functional connectivity, graph theory, and entropy analyses in 25 healthy people using task-free functional magnetic resonance imaging. We calculated the pairwise instantaneous phase synchrony between 8,192 brain nodes for a total of 200 time points. This resulted in graphs for which time series of clustering coefficients (the “cliquiness” of a node) and participation coefficients (the between-module connectivity of a node) were estimated. For these two network metrics, sample entropy was calculated. The procedure produced a number of results: (1) Entropy is higher for the participation coefficient than for the clustering coefficient. (2) The average clustering coefficient is negatively related to its associated entropy, whereas the average participation coefficient is positively related to its associated entropy. (3) The level of entropy is network-specific to the participation coefficient, but not to the clustering coefficient. High entropy for the participation coefficient was observed in the default-mode, visual, and motor networks. These results were further validated using an independent replication dataset. Our work confirms that brain networks are temporally complex. Entropy is a good candidate metric to explore temporal network alterations in diseases with paroxysmal brain disruptions, including schizophrenia and epilepsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5988394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59883942018-06-15 Spontaneous brain network activity: Analysis of its temporal complexity Pedersen, Mangor Omidvarnia, Amir Walz, Jennifer M. Zalesky, Andrew Jackson, Graeme D. Netw Neurosci Research The brain operates in a complex way. The temporal complexity underlying macroscopic and spontaneous brain network activity is still to be understood. In this study, we explored the brain’s complexity by combining functional connectivity, graph theory, and entropy analyses in 25 healthy people using task-free functional magnetic resonance imaging. We calculated the pairwise instantaneous phase synchrony between 8,192 brain nodes for a total of 200 time points. This resulted in graphs for which time series of clustering coefficients (the “cliquiness” of a node) and participation coefficients (the between-module connectivity of a node) were estimated. For these two network metrics, sample entropy was calculated. The procedure produced a number of results: (1) Entropy is higher for the participation coefficient than for the clustering coefficient. (2) The average clustering coefficient is negatively related to its associated entropy, whereas the average participation coefficient is positively related to its associated entropy. (3) The level of entropy is network-specific to the participation coefficient, but not to the clustering coefficient. High entropy for the participation coefficient was observed in the default-mode, visual, and motor networks. These results were further validated using an independent replication dataset. Our work confirms that brain networks are temporally complex. Entropy is a good candidate metric to explore temporal network alterations in diseases with paroxysmal brain disruptions, including schizophrenia and epilepsy. MIT Press 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5988394/ /pubmed/29911666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/NETN_a_00006 Text en © 2017 Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Pedersen, Mangor
Omidvarnia, Amir
Walz, Jennifer M.
Zalesky, Andrew
Jackson, Graeme D.
Spontaneous brain network activity: Analysis of its temporal complexity
title Spontaneous brain network activity: Analysis of its temporal complexity
title_full Spontaneous brain network activity: Analysis of its temporal complexity
title_fullStr Spontaneous brain network activity: Analysis of its temporal complexity
title_full_unstemmed Spontaneous brain network activity: Analysis of its temporal complexity
title_short Spontaneous brain network activity: Analysis of its temporal complexity
title_sort spontaneous brain network activity: analysis of its temporal complexity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29911666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/NETN_a_00006
work_keys_str_mv AT pedersenmangor spontaneousbrainnetworkactivityanalysisofitstemporalcomplexity
AT omidvarniaamir spontaneousbrainnetworkactivityanalysisofitstemporalcomplexity
AT walzjenniferm spontaneousbrainnetworkactivityanalysisofitstemporalcomplexity
AT zaleskyandrew spontaneousbrainnetworkactivityanalysisofitstemporalcomplexity
AT jacksongraemed spontaneousbrainnetworkactivityanalysisofitstemporalcomplexity