Cargando…

Invasive physiological indices to determine the functional significance of coronary stenosis

Physiological measurements are now commonly used to assess coronary lesions in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, and this practice is evidence-based and supported by clinical guidelines. Fractional flow reserve is currently the gold standard method to determine whether coronary lesions are fun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AL-Obaidi, Firas R., Fearon, William F., Yong, Andy S.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.02.003
_version_ 1783329293342867456
author AL-Obaidi, Firas R.
Fearon, William F.
Yong, Andy S.C.
author_facet AL-Obaidi, Firas R.
Fearon, William F.
Yong, Andy S.C.
author_sort AL-Obaidi, Firas R.
collection PubMed
description Physiological measurements are now commonly used to assess coronary lesions in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, and this practice is evidence-based and supported by clinical guidelines. Fractional flow reserve is currently the gold standard method to determine whether coronary lesions are functionally significant, and is used to guide revascularization. There are however several other physiological measurements that have been proposed as alternatives to the fractional flow reserve. This review aims to comprehensively discuss physiological indices that can be used in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory to determine the functional significance of coronary lesions. We will focus on their advantages and disadvantages, and the current evidence supporting their use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5988484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59884842018-06-06 Invasive physiological indices to determine the functional significance of coronary stenosis AL-Obaidi, Firas R. Fearon, William F. Yong, Andy S.C. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Review Physiological measurements are now commonly used to assess coronary lesions in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, and this practice is evidence-based and supported by clinical guidelines. Fractional flow reserve is currently the gold standard method to determine whether coronary lesions are functionally significant, and is used to guide revascularization. There are however several other physiological measurements that have been proposed as alternatives to the fractional flow reserve. This review aims to comprehensively discuss physiological indices that can be used in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory to determine the functional significance of coronary lesions. We will focus on their advantages and disadvantages, and the current evidence supporting their use. Elsevier 2018-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5988484/ /pubmed/29876502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.02.003 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
AL-Obaidi, Firas R.
Fearon, William F.
Yong, Andy S.C.
Invasive physiological indices to determine the functional significance of coronary stenosis
title Invasive physiological indices to determine the functional significance of coronary stenosis
title_full Invasive physiological indices to determine the functional significance of coronary stenosis
title_fullStr Invasive physiological indices to determine the functional significance of coronary stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Invasive physiological indices to determine the functional significance of coronary stenosis
title_short Invasive physiological indices to determine the functional significance of coronary stenosis
title_sort invasive physiological indices to determine the functional significance of coronary stenosis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.02.003
work_keys_str_mv AT alobaidifirasr invasivephysiologicalindicestodeterminethefunctionalsignificanceofcoronarystenosis
AT fearonwilliamf invasivephysiologicalindicestodeterminethefunctionalsignificanceofcoronarystenosis
AT yongandysc invasivephysiologicalindicestodeterminethefunctionalsignificanceofcoronarystenosis