Cargando…

Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of tumour budding was retrospectively analysed in a cohort of 173 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) of the prospective clinical multicentre CONKO-001 trial. METHODS: Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole tissue slides were eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lohneis, Philipp, Sinn, Marianne, Klein, Fritz, Bischoff, Sven, Striefler, Jana K., Wislocka, Lilianna, Sinn, Bruno V., Pelzer, Uwe, Oettle, Helmut, Riess, Hanno, Denkert, Carsten, Bläker, Hendrik, Jühling, Anja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0093-y
_version_ 1783329319181877248
author Lohneis, Philipp
Sinn, Marianne
Klein, Fritz
Bischoff, Sven
Striefler, Jana K.
Wislocka, Lilianna
Sinn, Bruno V.
Pelzer, Uwe
Oettle, Helmut
Riess, Hanno
Denkert, Carsten
Bläker, Hendrik
Jühling, Anja
author_facet Lohneis, Philipp
Sinn, Marianne
Klein, Fritz
Bischoff, Sven
Striefler, Jana K.
Wislocka, Lilianna
Sinn, Bruno V.
Pelzer, Uwe
Oettle, Helmut
Riess, Hanno
Denkert, Carsten
Bläker, Hendrik
Jühling, Anja
author_sort Lohneis, Philipp
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of tumour budding was retrospectively analysed in a cohort of 173 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) of the prospective clinical multicentre CONKO-001 trial. METHODS: Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole tissue slides were evaluated. In two independent approaches, the mean number of tumour buds was analysed according to the consensus criteria in colorectal cancer, in one 0.785 mm(2) field of view and additionally in 10 high-power fields (HPF) (HPF = 0.238 mm(2)). RESULTS: Tumour budding was significantly associated with a higher tumour grade (p < 0.001) but not with distant or lymph node metastasis. Regardless of the quantification approach, an increased number of tumour buds was significantly associated with reduced disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (10 HPF approach DFS: HR = 1.056 (95% CI 1.022–1.092), p = 0.001; OS: HR = 1.052 (95% CI 1.018–1.087), p = 0.002; consensus method DFS: HR = 1.037 (95% CI 1.017–1.058), p < 0.001; OS: HR = 1.040 (95% CI 1.019–1.061), p < 0.001). Recently published cut-offs for tumour budding in colorectal cancer were prognostic in PDAC as well. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour budding is prognostic in the CONKO-001 clinical cohort of patients. Further standardisation and validation in additional clinical cohorts are necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5988658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59886582019-05-29 Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Lohneis, Philipp Sinn, Marianne Klein, Fritz Bischoff, Sven Striefler, Jana K. Wislocka, Lilianna Sinn, Bruno V. Pelzer, Uwe Oettle, Helmut Riess, Hanno Denkert, Carsten Bläker, Hendrik Jühling, Anja Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of tumour budding was retrospectively analysed in a cohort of 173 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) of the prospective clinical multicentre CONKO-001 trial. METHODS: Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole tissue slides were evaluated. In two independent approaches, the mean number of tumour buds was analysed according to the consensus criteria in colorectal cancer, in one 0.785 mm(2) field of view and additionally in 10 high-power fields (HPF) (HPF = 0.238 mm(2)). RESULTS: Tumour budding was significantly associated with a higher tumour grade (p < 0.001) but not with distant or lymph node metastasis. Regardless of the quantification approach, an increased number of tumour buds was significantly associated with reduced disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (10 HPF approach DFS: HR = 1.056 (95% CI 1.022–1.092), p = 0.001; OS: HR = 1.052 (95% CI 1.018–1.087), p = 0.002; consensus method DFS: HR = 1.037 (95% CI 1.017–1.058), p < 0.001; OS: HR = 1.040 (95% CI 1.019–1.061), p < 0.001). Recently published cut-offs for tumour budding in colorectal cancer were prognostic in PDAC as well. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour budding is prognostic in the CONKO-001 clinical cohort of patients. Further standardisation and validation in additional clinical cohorts are necessary. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-14 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5988658/ /pubmed/29755112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0093-y Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note: This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Lohneis, Philipp
Sinn, Marianne
Klein, Fritz
Bischoff, Sven
Striefler, Jana K.
Wislocka, Lilianna
Sinn, Bruno V.
Pelzer, Uwe
Oettle, Helmut
Riess, Hanno
Denkert, Carsten
Bläker, Hendrik
Jühling, Anja
Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_full Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_short Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_sort tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0093-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lohneisphilipp tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT sinnmarianne tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT kleinfritz tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT bischoffsven tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT strieflerjanak tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT wislockalilianna tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT sinnbrunov tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT pelzeruwe tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT oettlehelmut tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT riesshanno tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT denkertcarsten tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT blakerhendrik tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT juhlinganja tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma