Cargando…
Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of tumour budding was retrospectively analysed in a cohort of 173 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) of the prospective clinical multicentre CONKO-001 trial. METHODS: Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole tissue slides were eva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0093-y |
_version_ | 1783329319181877248 |
---|---|
author | Lohneis, Philipp Sinn, Marianne Klein, Fritz Bischoff, Sven Striefler, Jana K. Wislocka, Lilianna Sinn, Bruno V. Pelzer, Uwe Oettle, Helmut Riess, Hanno Denkert, Carsten Bläker, Hendrik Jühling, Anja |
author_facet | Lohneis, Philipp Sinn, Marianne Klein, Fritz Bischoff, Sven Striefler, Jana K. Wislocka, Lilianna Sinn, Bruno V. Pelzer, Uwe Oettle, Helmut Riess, Hanno Denkert, Carsten Bläker, Hendrik Jühling, Anja |
author_sort | Lohneis, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of tumour budding was retrospectively analysed in a cohort of 173 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) of the prospective clinical multicentre CONKO-001 trial. METHODS: Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole tissue slides were evaluated. In two independent approaches, the mean number of tumour buds was analysed according to the consensus criteria in colorectal cancer, in one 0.785 mm(2) field of view and additionally in 10 high-power fields (HPF) (HPF = 0.238 mm(2)). RESULTS: Tumour budding was significantly associated with a higher tumour grade (p < 0.001) but not with distant or lymph node metastasis. Regardless of the quantification approach, an increased number of tumour buds was significantly associated with reduced disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (10 HPF approach DFS: HR = 1.056 (95% CI 1.022–1.092), p = 0.001; OS: HR = 1.052 (95% CI 1.018–1.087), p = 0.002; consensus method DFS: HR = 1.037 (95% CI 1.017–1.058), p < 0.001; OS: HR = 1.040 (95% CI 1.019–1.061), p < 0.001). Recently published cut-offs for tumour budding in colorectal cancer were prognostic in PDAC as well. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour budding is prognostic in the CONKO-001 clinical cohort of patients. Further standardisation and validation in additional clinical cohorts are necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5988658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59886582019-05-29 Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Lohneis, Philipp Sinn, Marianne Klein, Fritz Bischoff, Sven Striefler, Jana K. Wislocka, Lilianna Sinn, Bruno V. Pelzer, Uwe Oettle, Helmut Riess, Hanno Denkert, Carsten Bläker, Hendrik Jühling, Anja Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of tumour budding was retrospectively analysed in a cohort of 173 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) of the prospective clinical multicentre CONKO-001 trial. METHODS: Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole tissue slides were evaluated. In two independent approaches, the mean number of tumour buds was analysed according to the consensus criteria in colorectal cancer, in one 0.785 mm(2) field of view and additionally in 10 high-power fields (HPF) (HPF = 0.238 mm(2)). RESULTS: Tumour budding was significantly associated with a higher tumour grade (p < 0.001) but not with distant or lymph node metastasis. Regardless of the quantification approach, an increased number of tumour buds was significantly associated with reduced disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (10 HPF approach DFS: HR = 1.056 (95% CI 1.022–1.092), p = 0.001; OS: HR = 1.052 (95% CI 1.018–1.087), p = 0.002; consensus method DFS: HR = 1.037 (95% CI 1.017–1.058), p < 0.001; OS: HR = 1.040 (95% CI 1.019–1.061), p < 0.001). Recently published cut-offs for tumour budding in colorectal cancer were prognostic in PDAC as well. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour budding is prognostic in the CONKO-001 clinical cohort of patients. Further standardisation and validation in additional clinical cohorts are necessary. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-14 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5988658/ /pubmed/29755112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0093-y Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note: This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Article Lohneis, Philipp Sinn, Marianne Klein, Fritz Bischoff, Sven Striefler, Jana K. Wislocka, Lilianna Sinn, Bruno V. Pelzer, Uwe Oettle, Helmut Riess, Hanno Denkert, Carsten Bläker, Hendrik Jühling, Anja Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title | Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_full | Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_short | Tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | tumour buds determine prognosis in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0093-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lohneisphilipp tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT sinnmarianne tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT kleinfritz tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT bischoffsven tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT strieflerjanak tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT wislockalilianna tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT sinnbrunov tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT pelzeruwe tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT oettlehelmut tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT riesshanno tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT denkertcarsten tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT blakerhendrik tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT juhlinganja tumourbudsdetermineprognosisinresectedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma |