Cargando…
Complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation versus MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up
PURPOSE: To estimate the effectiveness of complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation compared with MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus treatment for 36 months follow-up. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MyoRing implantati...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0593-4 |
_version_ | 1783329348808343552 |
---|---|
author | Bikbova, Guzel Kazakbaeva, Gyulli Bikbov, Mukharram Usubov, Emin |
author_facet | Bikbova, Guzel Kazakbaeva, Gyulli Bikbov, Mukharram Usubov, Emin |
author_sort | Bikbova, Guzel |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To estimate the effectiveness of complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation compared with MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus treatment for 36 months follow-up. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MyoRing implantation was performed in a series of 78 patients (80 eyes) with keratoconus II–III Amsler classification, of these 39 eyes had MyoRing implantation combined with CXL. Implantation of a MyoRing in the corneal pocket was performed using a PocketMaker microkeratome and corneal intrastromal implantation system. During CXL, riboflavin solution 0.1% was injected into the corneal pocket through the incision tunnel and standard surface UVA irradiation (370 nm, 3 mW/cm(2)) was then applied from 5-cm distance for 30 min. RESULTS: Significant improvements in uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity were observed for both groups, which was relatively better 12 months after procedure in MyoRing alone group; however, in 36 months there was no difference between groups. Keratometry was reduced in both groups; after MyoRing implantation for 8.45 D and MyoRing + CXL for 9.43 D, the spherical equivalent decreased from 8.45 to 7.72 D and from 9.43 to 6.25 D, respectively. The cylinder decreased to 3.33 D with MyoRing alone and to 3.31 D with MyoRing + CXL. Corneal thickness remained nearly unchanged (from 433.69 ± 38.76 to 434.21 ± 34.98) in MyoRing group and decreased from baseline (from 426.93 ± 46.58 to 401.24 ± 39.12 µm) in MyoRing + CXL group 36 months postoperatively, which corresponds with pachymetry reduction after conventional CXL. CONCLUSION: Both MyoRing implantation and MyoRing combined with CXL were effective for treating keratoconus. At 36 months, there were slightly better outcomes in MyoRing + CXL group; however, in MyoRing alone group visual and refractive outcomes were stable overtime. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5988788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59887882018-06-12 Complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation versus MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up Bikbova, Guzel Kazakbaeva, Gyulli Bikbov, Mukharram Usubov, Emin Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To estimate the effectiveness of complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation compared with MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus treatment for 36 months follow-up. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MyoRing implantation was performed in a series of 78 patients (80 eyes) with keratoconus II–III Amsler classification, of these 39 eyes had MyoRing implantation combined with CXL. Implantation of a MyoRing in the corneal pocket was performed using a PocketMaker microkeratome and corneal intrastromal implantation system. During CXL, riboflavin solution 0.1% was injected into the corneal pocket through the incision tunnel and standard surface UVA irradiation (370 nm, 3 mW/cm(2)) was then applied from 5-cm distance for 30 min. RESULTS: Significant improvements in uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity were observed for both groups, which was relatively better 12 months after procedure in MyoRing alone group; however, in 36 months there was no difference between groups. Keratometry was reduced in both groups; after MyoRing implantation for 8.45 D and MyoRing + CXL for 9.43 D, the spherical equivalent decreased from 8.45 to 7.72 D and from 9.43 to 6.25 D, respectively. The cylinder decreased to 3.33 D with MyoRing alone and to 3.31 D with MyoRing + CXL. Corneal thickness remained nearly unchanged (from 433.69 ± 38.76 to 434.21 ± 34.98) in MyoRing group and decreased from baseline (from 426.93 ± 46.58 to 401.24 ± 39.12 µm) in MyoRing + CXL group 36 months postoperatively, which corresponds with pachymetry reduction after conventional CXL. CONCLUSION: Both MyoRing implantation and MyoRing combined with CXL were effective for treating keratoconus. At 36 months, there were slightly better outcomes in MyoRing + CXL group; however, in MyoRing alone group visual and refractive outcomes were stable overtime. Springer Netherlands 2017-06-15 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5988788/ /pubmed/28620706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0593-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Bikbova, Guzel Kazakbaeva, Gyulli Bikbov, Mukharram Usubov, Emin Complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation versus MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up |
title | Complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation versus MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up |
title_full | Complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation versus MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up |
title_fullStr | Complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation versus MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation versus MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up |
title_short | Complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation versus MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up |
title_sort | complete corneal ring (myoring) implantation versus myoring implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5988788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0593-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bikbovaguzel completecornealringmyoringimplantationversusmyoringimplantationcombinedwithcornealcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconus3yearfollowup AT kazakbaevagyulli completecornealringmyoringimplantationversusmyoringimplantationcombinedwithcornealcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconus3yearfollowup AT bikbovmukharram completecornealringmyoringimplantationversusmyoringimplantationcombinedwithcornealcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconus3yearfollowup AT usubovemin completecornealringmyoringimplantationversusmyoringimplantationcombinedwithcornealcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconus3yearfollowup |