Cargando…
Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review
OBJECTIVE: Bevacizumab is approved for use in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer (CC), with increased survival/response rates. However, use of bevacizumab is not always feasible or safe. The purpose of this study was to identify the percentage of metastatic/recurr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29887734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179554918779587 |
_version_ | 1783329383573880832 |
---|---|
author | Skelton, William Paul Castagno, Jacqueline Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel Daily, Karen Yeung, Anamaria Markham, Merry Jennifer |
author_facet | Skelton, William Paul Castagno, Jacqueline Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel Daily, Karen Yeung, Anamaria Markham, Merry Jennifer |
author_sort | Skelton, William Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Bevacizumab is approved for use in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer (CC), with increased survival/response rates. However, use of bevacizumab is not always feasible or safe. The purpose of this study was to identify the percentage of metastatic/recurrent CC patients at our institution who would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to identify metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated at UFHealth between 2006 and 2016. Chart review was performed to determine if the patient met bevacizumab eligibility criteria. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients with metastatic/recurrent CC were identified; 85.5% would have been ineligible to receive bevacizumab, and 14.5% would have been eligible. The most common reason for exclusion was active bleeding (68.4%); 94% of which was vaginal. In all, 27.6% would be excluded due to poor renal function, and 23.7% due to poor performance status (PS). CONCLUSIONS: Despite improved survival, only 14.5% of metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated over a 10-year period would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. Most patients would have been excluded due to active bleeding, most commonly vaginal bleeding, a common complication from their disease. Identifying novel therapies for metastatic/recurrent CC patients with improved safety profiles that would allow for their use in this challenging population is critical. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5989046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59890462018-06-08 Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review Skelton, William Paul Castagno, Jacqueline Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel Daily, Karen Yeung, Anamaria Markham, Merry Jennifer Clin Med Insights Oncol Review OBJECTIVE: Bevacizumab is approved for use in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer (CC), with increased survival/response rates. However, use of bevacizumab is not always feasible or safe. The purpose of this study was to identify the percentage of metastatic/recurrent CC patients at our institution who would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to identify metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated at UFHealth between 2006 and 2016. Chart review was performed to determine if the patient met bevacizumab eligibility criteria. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients with metastatic/recurrent CC were identified; 85.5% would have been ineligible to receive bevacizumab, and 14.5% would have been eligible. The most common reason for exclusion was active bleeding (68.4%); 94% of which was vaginal. In all, 27.6% would be excluded due to poor renal function, and 23.7% due to poor performance status (PS). CONCLUSIONS: Despite improved survival, only 14.5% of metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated over a 10-year period would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. Most patients would have been excluded due to active bleeding, most commonly vaginal bleeding, a common complication from their disease. Identifying novel therapies for metastatic/recurrent CC patients with improved safety profiles that would allow for their use in this challenging population is critical. SAGE Publications 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5989046/ /pubmed/29887734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179554918779587 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Skelton, William Paul Castagno, Jacqueline Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel Daily, Karen Yeung, Anamaria Markham, Merry Jennifer Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review |
title | Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review |
title_full | Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review |
title_fullStr | Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review |
title_short | Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review |
title_sort | bevacizumab eligibility in patients with metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer: a retrospective review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29887734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179554918779587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skeltonwilliampaul bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview AT castagnojacqueline bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview AT cardenasgoicoecheajoel bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview AT dailykaren bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview AT yeunganamaria bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview AT markhammerryjennifer bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview |