Cargando…

Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review

OBJECTIVE: Bevacizumab is approved for use in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer (CC), with increased survival/response rates. However, use of bevacizumab is not always feasible or safe. The purpose of this study was to identify the percentage of metastatic/recurr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skelton, William Paul, Castagno, Jacqueline, Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel, Daily, Karen, Yeung, Anamaria, Markham, Merry Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29887734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179554918779587
_version_ 1783329383573880832
author Skelton, William Paul
Castagno, Jacqueline
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel
Daily, Karen
Yeung, Anamaria
Markham, Merry Jennifer
author_facet Skelton, William Paul
Castagno, Jacqueline
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel
Daily, Karen
Yeung, Anamaria
Markham, Merry Jennifer
author_sort Skelton, William Paul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Bevacizumab is approved for use in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer (CC), with increased survival/response rates. However, use of bevacizumab is not always feasible or safe. The purpose of this study was to identify the percentage of metastatic/recurrent CC patients at our institution who would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to identify metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated at UFHealth between 2006 and 2016. Chart review was performed to determine if the patient met bevacizumab eligibility criteria. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients with metastatic/recurrent CC were identified; 85.5% would have been ineligible to receive bevacizumab, and 14.5% would have been eligible. The most common reason for exclusion was active bleeding (68.4%); 94% of which was vaginal. In all, 27.6% would be excluded due to poor renal function, and 23.7% due to poor performance status (PS). CONCLUSIONS: Despite improved survival, only 14.5% of metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated over a 10-year period would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. Most patients would have been excluded due to active bleeding, most commonly vaginal bleeding, a common complication from their disease. Identifying novel therapies for metastatic/recurrent CC patients with improved safety profiles that would allow for their use in this challenging population is critical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5989046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59890462018-06-08 Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review Skelton, William Paul Castagno, Jacqueline Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel Daily, Karen Yeung, Anamaria Markham, Merry Jennifer Clin Med Insights Oncol Review OBJECTIVE: Bevacizumab is approved for use in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer (CC), with increased survival/response rates. However, use of bevacizumab is not always feasible or safe. The purpose of this study was to identify the percentage of metastatic/recurrent CC patients at our institution who would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to identify metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated at UFHealth between 2006 and 2016. Chart review was performed to determine if the patient met bevacizumab eligibility criteria. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients with metastatic/recurrent CC were identified; 85.5% would have been ineligible to receive bevacizumab, and 14.5% would have been eligible. The most common reason for exclusion was active bleeding (68.4%); 94% of which was vaginal. In all, 27.6% would be excluded due to poor renal function, and 23.7% due to poor performance status (PS). CONCLUSIONS: Despite improved survival, only 14.5% of metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated over a 10-year period would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. Most patients would have been excluded due to active bleeding, most commonly vaginal bleeding, a common complication from their disease. Identifying novel therapies for metastatic/recurrent CC patients with improved safety profiles that would allow for their use in this challenging population is critical. SAGE Publications 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5989046/ /pubmed/29887734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179554918779587 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Skelton, William Paul
Castagno, Jacqueline
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel
Daily, Karen
Yeung, Anamaria
Markham, Merry Jennifer
Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review
title Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review
title_full Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review
title_fullStr Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review
title_full_unstemmed Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review
title_short Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review
title_sort bevacizumab eligibility in patients with metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer: a retrospective review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29887734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179554918779587
work_keys_str_mv AT skeltonwilliampaul bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview
AT castagnojacqueline bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview
AT cardenasgoicoecheajoel bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview
AT dailykaren bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview
AT yeunganamaria bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview
AT markhammerryjennifer bevacizumabeligibilityinpatientswithmetastaticandrecurrentcervicalcanceraretrospectivereview