Cargando…

The future of male contraception: a fertile ground

The continued and rapid expansion of the Earth’s population mandates the need for safe and effective measures of contraception. While a plethora of options exist for women, methods of contraception for the male partner are limited to condoms and vasectomy. The sequela of this discrepancy has led to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khourdaji, Iyad, Zillioux, Jacqueline, Eisenfrats, Kevin, Foley, Daniel, Smith, Ryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29928620
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.03.23
_version_ 1783329392031694848
author Khourdaji, Iyad
Zillioux, Jacqueline
Eisenfrats, Kevin
Foley, Daniel
Smith, Ryan
author_facet Khourdaji, Iyad
Zillioux, Jacqueline
Eisenfrats, Kevin
Foley, Daniel
Smith, Ryan
author_sort Khourdaji, Iyad
collection PubMed
description The continued and rapid expansion of the Earth’s population mandates the need for safe and effective measures of contraception. While a plethora of options exist for women, methods of contraception for the male partner are limited to condoms and vasectomy. The sequela of this discrepancy has led to the family planning burden falling disproportionately on the female partner. For the past several decades, extensive research has been undertaken exploring the feasibility of hormonal male contraception. This proposed method of contraception has focused on suppressing spermatogenesis by exploiting the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Beginning with proof of concept studies in the early nineties, administration of testosterone in healthy male subjects has been shown to be an efficacious method of inducing sterility. Owing to ethnic differences in spermatogenesis suppression and the comparatively low rate of azoospermia in Caucasian men with androgen-only regimens, investigators have explored the addition of progestins to further enhance the efficacy of hormonal contraception. Though studies have revealed promise with androgen-progestin regimens, the lack of long-term studies has precluded the development of a marketable product. Recently, more research has been directed towards identifying non-hormonal alternatives to male contraception. These non-hormonal options have ranged from the development of devices facilitating reversible occlusion of the vas deferens lumen to medications disrupting various pathways in the process of spermatogenesis. Underlying the development of hormonal and non-hormonal strategies is the shared enthusiasm men and women have towards these male directed methods. The willingness of couples to pursue these alternatives combined with the global need to reduce the psychological and socioeconomic implications of unintended pregnancy ensures that research will continue to bring this goal to fruition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5989114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59891142018-06-20 The future of male contraception: a fertile ground Khourdaji, Iyad Zillioux, Jacqueline Eisenfrats, Kevin Foley, Daniel Smith, Ryan Transl Androl Urol Review Article The continued and rapid expansion of the Earth’s population mandates the need for safe and effective measures of contraception. While a plethora of options exist for women, methods of contraception for the male partner are limited to condoms and vasectomy. The sequela of this discrepancy has led to the family planning burden falling disproportionately on the female partner. For the past several decades, extensive research has been undertaken exploring the feasibility of hormonal male contraception. This proposed method of contraception has focused on suppressing spermatogenesis by exploiting the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Beginning with proof of concept studies in the early nineties, administration of testosterone in healthy male subjects has been shown to be an efficacious method of inducing sterility. Owing to ethnic differences in spermatogenesis suppression and the comparatively low rate of azoospermia in Caucasian men with androgen-only regimens, investigators have explored the addition of progestins to further enhance the efficacy of hormonal contraception. Though studies have revealed promise with androgen-progestin regimens, the lack of long-term studies has precluded the development of a marketable product. Recently, more research has been directed towards identifying non-hormonal alternatives to male contraception. These non-hormonal options have ranged from the development of devices facilitating reversible occlusion of the vas deferens lumen to medications disrupting various pathways in the process of spermatogenesis. Underlying the development of hormonal and non-hormonal strategies is the shared enthusiasm men and women have towards these male directed methods. The willingness of couples to pursue these alternatives combined with the global need to reduce the psychological and socioeconomic implications of unintended pregnancy ensures that research will continue to bring this goal to fruition. AME Publishing Company 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5989114/ /pubmed/29928620 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.03.23 Text en 2018 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Khourdaji, Iyad
Zillioux, Jacqueline
Eisenfrats, Kevin
Foley, Daniel
Smith, Ryan
The future of male contraception: a fertile ground
title The future of male contraception: a fertile ground
title_full The future of male contraception: a fertile ground
title_fullStr The future of male contraception: a fertile ground
title_full_unstemmed The future of male contraception: a fertile ground
title_short The future of male contraception: a fertile ground
title_sort future of male contraception: a fertile ground
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29928620
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.03.23
work_keys_str_mv AT khourdajiiyad thefutureofmalecontraceptionafertileground
AT zilliouxjacqueline thefutureofmalecontraceptionafertileground
AT eisenfratskevin thefutureofmalecontraceptionafertileground
AT foleydaniel thefutureofmalecontraceptionafertileground
AT smithryan thefutureofmalecontraceptionafertileground
AT khourdajiiyad futureofmalecontraceptionafertileground
AT zilliouxjacqueline futureofmalecontraceptionafertileground
AT eisenfratskevin futureofmalecontraceptionafertileground
AT foleydaniel futureofmalecontraceptionafertileground
AT smithryan futureofmalecontraceptionafertileground