Cargando…

The impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: To examine the effect of intra-operative cell salvage (ICS) in open radical prostatectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy for malignancy at our institution between 10/04/2013 and 10/04/2017 were enrolled. Patients were grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinnear, Ned, Heijkoop, Bridget, Hua, Lina, Hennessey, Derek B., Spernat, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29928615
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.04.19
_version_ 1783329392505651200
author Kinnear, Ned
Heijkoop, Bridget
Hua, Lina
Hennessey, Derek B.
Spernat, Daniel
author_facet Kinnear, Ned
Heijkoop, Bridget
Hua, Lina
Hennessey, Derek B.
Spernat, Daniel
author_sort Kinnear, Ned
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To examine the effect of intra-operative cell salvage (ICS) in open radical prostatectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy for malignancy at our institution between 10/04/2013 and 10/04/2017 were enrolled. Patients were grouped and compared based on whether they received ICS. Primary outcomes were allogeneic transfusion rates, and disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes were complications and transfusion-related cost. RESULTS: Fifty-nine men were enrolled; 30 used no blood conservation technique, while 29 employed ICS. There were no significant differences between groups in age, pre- or post-operative haemoglobin, Charlson comorbidity index, operation duration or length of stay. Tumour characteristics were also similar between groups, including pre-operative prostate specific antigen, post-operative Gleason score, T-stage, nodal status and rates of margin positivity. Compared with controls, the ICS group had longer follow up (945 vs. 989 days; P=0.0016). The control and ICS groups were not significantly different in rates of tumour recurrence (6 vs. 3 patients; P=0.30) or complications (10 vs. 5 patients; P=0.16). While the proportion of patients receiving allogenic transfusion was similar (9 vs. 6 patients; P=0.41), fewer red blood products transfused (40 vs. 12 units) meant transfusion related costs were lower in ICS patients (AUD $47,666 vs. $37,429). CONCLUSIONS: ICS reduced transfusion related costs, without affecting allogeneic transfusion rates, tumour recurrence or complication rates. These findings extend the literature supporting ICS in oncological surgery. Prospective randomised studies are needed to confirm the existing level III evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5989116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59891162018-06-20 The impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy Kinnear, Ned Heijkoop, Bridget Hua, Lina Hennessey, Derek B. Spernat, Daniel Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: To examine the effect of intra-operative cell salvage (ICS) in open radical prostatectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy for malignancy at our institution between 10/04/2013 and 10/04/2017 were enrolled. Patients were grouped and compared based on whether they received ICS. Primary outcomes were allogeneic transfusion rates, and disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes were complications and transfusion-related cost. RESULTS: Fifty-nine men were enrolled; 30 used no blood conservation technique, while 29 employed ICS. There were no significant differences between groups in age, pre- or post-operative haemoglobin, Charlson comorbidity index, operation duration or length of stay. Tumour characteristics were also similar between groups, including pre-operative prostate specific antigen, post-operative Gleason score, T-stage, nodal status and rates of margin positivity. Compared with controls, the ICS group had longer follow up (945 vs. 989 days; P=0.0016). The control and ICS groups were not significantly different in rates of tumour recurrence (6 vs. 3 patients; P=0.30) or complications (10 vs. 5 patients; P=0.16). While the proportion of patients receiving allogenic transfusion was similar (9 vs. 6 patients; P=0.41), fewer red blood products transfused (40 vs. 12 units) meant transfusion related costs were lower in ICS patients (AUD $47,666 vs. $37,429). CONCLUSIONS: ICS reduced transfusion related costs, without affecting allogeneic transfusion rates, tumour recurrence or complication rates. These findings extend the literature supporting ICS in oncological surgery. Prospective randomised studies are needed to confirm the existing level III evidence. AME Publishing Company 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5989116/ /pubmed/29928615 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.04.19 Text en 2018 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kinnear, Ned
Heijkoop, Bridget
Hua, Lina
Hennessey, Derek B.
Spernat, Daniel
The impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy
title The impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy
title_full The impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr The impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed The impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy
title_short The impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy
title_sort impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29928615
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.04.19
work_keys_str_mv AT kinnearned theimpactofintraoperativecellsalvageduringopenradicalprostatectomy
AT heijkoopbridget theimpactofintraoperativecellsalvageduringopenradicalprostatectomy
AT hualina theimpactofintraoperativecellsalvageduringopenradicalprostatectomy
AT hennesseyderekb theimpactofintraoperativecellsalvageduringopenradicalprostatectomy
AT spernatdaniel theimpactofintraoperativecellsalvageduringopenradicalprostatectomy
AT kinnearned impactofintraoperativecellsalvageduringopenradicalprostatectomy
AT heijkoopbridget impactofintraoperativecellsalvageduringopenradicalprostatectomy
AT hualina impactofintraoperativecellsalvageduringopenradicalprostatectomy
AT hennesseyderekb impactofintraoperativecellsalvageduringopenradicalprostatectomy
AT spernatdaniel impactofintraoperativecellsalvageduringopenradicalprostatectomy