Cargando…

Evaluating drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis: the challenges

For decades antimonials were the drugs of choice for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL), but the recent emergence of resistance has made them redundant as first-line therapy in the endemic VL region in the Indian subcontinent. The application of other drugs has been limited due to adverse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HENDRICKX, S, GUERIN, PJ, CALJON, G, CROFT, SL, MAES, L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27866478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016002031
_version_ 1783329436507045888
author HENDRICKX, S
GUERIN, PJ
CALJON, G
CROFT, SL
MAES, L
author_facet HENDRICKX, S
GUERIN, PJ
CALJON, G
CROFT, SL
MAES, L
author_sort HENDRICKX, S
collection PubMed
description For decades antimonials were the drugs of choice for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL), but the recent emergence of resistance has made them redundant as first-line therapy in the endemic VL region in the Indian subcontinent. The application of other drugs has been limited due to adverse effects, perceived high cost, need for parenteral administration and increasing rate of treatment failures. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmB) and miltefosine (MIL) have been positioned as the effective first-line treatments; however, the number of monotherapy MIL-failures has increased after a decade of use. Since no validated molecular resistance markers are yet available, monitoring and surveillance of changes in drug sensitivity and resistance still depends on standard phenotypic in vitro promastigote or amastigote susceptibility assays. Clinical isolates displaying defined MIL- or AmB-resistance are still fairly scarce and fundamental and applied research on resistance mechanisms and dynamics remains largely dependent on laboratory-generated drug resistant strains. This review addresses the various challenges associated with drug susceptibility and -resistance monitoring in VL, with particular emphasis on the choice of strains, susceptibility model selection and standardization of procedures with specific read-out parameters and well-defined threshold criteria. The latter are essential to support surveillance systems and safeguard the limited number of currently available antileishmanial drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5989324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59893242018-06-07 Evaluating drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis: the challenges HENDRICKX, S GUERIN, PJ CALJON, G CROFT, SL MAES, L Parasitology Research Article For decades antimonials were the drugs of choice for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL), but the recent emergence of resistance has made them redundant as first-line therapy in the endemic VL region in the Indian subcontinent. The application of other drugs has been limited due to adverse effects, perceived high cost, need for parenteral administration and increasing rate of treatment failures. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmB) and miltefosine (MIL) have been positioned as the effective first-line treatments; however, the number of monotherapy MIL-failures has increased after a decade of use. Since no validated molecular resistance markers are yet available, monitoring and surveillance of changes in drug sensitivity and resistance still depends on standard phenotypic in vitro promastigote or amastigote susceptibility assays. Clinical isolates displaying defined MIL- or AmB-resistance are still fairly scarce and fundamental and applied research on resistance mechanisms and dynamics remains largely dependent on laboratory-generated drug resistant strains. This review addresses the various challenges associated with drug susceptibility and -resistance monitoring in VL, with particular emphasis on the choice of strains, susceptibility model selection and standardization of procedures with specific read-out parameters and well-defined threshold criteria. The latter are essential to support surveillance systems and safeguard the limited number of currently available antileishmanial drugs. Cambridge University Press 2018-04 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5989324/ /pubmed/27866478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016002031 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
HENDRICKX, S
GUERIN, PJ
CALJON, G
CROFT, SL
MAES, L
Evaluating drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis: the challenges
title Evaluating drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis: the challenges
title_full Evaluating drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis: the challenges
title_fullStr Evaluating drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis: the challenges
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis: the challenges
title_short Evaluating drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis: the challenges
title_sort evaluating drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis: the challenges
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27866478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016002031
work_keys_str_mv AT hendrickxs evaluatingdrugresistanceinvisceralleishmaniasisthechallenges
AT guerinpj evaluatingdrugresistanceinvisceralleishmaniasisthechallenges
AT caljong evaluatingdrugresistanceinvisceralleishmaniasisthechallenges
AT croftsl evaluatingdrugresistanceinvisceralleishmaniasisthechallenges
AT maesl evaluatingdrugresistanceinvisceralleishmaniasisthechallenges