Cargando…
Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students
BACKGROUND: Task-specific checklists, holistic rubrics, and analytic rubrics are often used for performance assessments. We examined what factors evaluators consider important in holistic scoring of clinical performance assessment, and compared the usefulness of applying holistic and analytic rubric...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29871677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1228-9 |
_version_ | 1783329439560499200 |
---|---|
author | Yune, So Jung Lee, Sang Yeoup Im, Sun Ju Kam, Bee Sung Baek, Sun Yong |
author_facet | Yune, So Jung Lee, Sang Yeoup Im, Sun Ju Kam, Bee Sung Baek, Sun Yong |
author_sort | Yune, So Jung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Task-specific checklists, holistic rubrics, and analytic rubrics are often used for performance assessments. We examined what factors evaluators consider important in holistic scoring of clinical performance assessment, and compared the usefulness of applying holistic and analytic rubrics respectively, and analytic rubrics in addition to task-specific checklists based on traditional standards. METHODS: We compared the usefulness of a holistic rubric versus an analytic rubric in effectively measuring the clinical skill performances of 126 third-year medical students who participated in a clinical performance assessment conducted by Pusan National University School of Medicine. We conducted a questionnaire survey of 37 evaluators who used all three evaluation methods—holistic rubric, analytic rubric, and task-specific checklist—for each student. The relationship between the scores on the three evaluation methods was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed by Kappa index. The effect of holistic and analytic rubric scores on the task-specific checklist score was analyzed using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Evaluators perceived accuracy and proficiency to be major factors in objective structured clinical examinations evaluation, and history taking and physical examination to be major factors in clinical performance examinations evaluation. Holistic rubric scores were highly related to the scores of the task-specific checklist and analytic rubric. Relatively low agreement was found in clinical performance examinations compared to objective structured clinical examinations. Meanwhile, the holistic and analytic rubric scores explained 59.1% of the task-specific checklist score in objective structured clinical examinations and 51.6% in clinical performance examinations. CONCLUSION: The results show the usefulness of holistic and analytic rubrics in clinical performance assessment, which can be used in conjunction with task-specific checklists for more efficient evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5989338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59893382018-06-20 Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students Yune, So Jung Lee, Sang Yeoup Im, Sun Ju Kam, Bee Sung Baek, Sun Yong BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Task-specific checklists, holistic rubrics, and analytic rubrics are often used for performance assessments. We examined what factors evaluators consider important in holistic scoring of clinical performance assessment, and compared the usefulness of applying holistic and analytic rubrics respectively, and analytic rubrics in addition to task-specific checklists based on traditional standards. METHODS: We compared the usefulness of a holistic rubric versus an analytic rubric in effectively measuring the clinical skill performances of 126 third-year medical students who participated in a clinical performance assessment conducted by Pusan National University School of Medicine. We conducted a questionnaire survey of 37 evaluators who used all three evaluation methods—holistic rubric, analytic rubric, and task-specific checklist—for each student. The relationship between the scores on the three evaluation methods was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed by Kappa index. The effect of holistic and analytic rubric scores on the task-specific checklist score was analyzed using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Evaluators perceived accuracy and proficiency to be major factors in objective structured clinical examinations evaluation, and history taking and physical examination to be major factors in clinical performance examinations evaluation. Holistic rubric scores were highly related to the scores of the task-specific checklist and analytic rubric. Relatively low agreement was found in clinical performance examinations compared to objective structured clinical examinations. Meanwhile, the holistic and analytic rubric scores explained 59.1% of the task-specific checklist score in objective structured clinical examinations and 51.6% in clinical performance examinations. CONCLUSION: The results show the usefulness of holistic and analytic rubrics in clinical performance assessment, which can be used in conjunction with task-specific checklists for more efficient evaluation. BioMed Central 2018-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5989338/ /pubmed/29871677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1228-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yune, So Jung Lee, Sang Yeoup Im, Sun Ju Kam, Bee Sung Baek, Sun Yong Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students |
title | Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students |
title_full | Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students |
title_fullStr | Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students |
title_full_unstemmed | Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students |
title_short | Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students |
title_sort | holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29871677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1228-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yunesojung holisticrubricvsanalyticrubricformeasuringclinicalperformancelevelsinmedicalstudents AT leesangyeoup holisticrubricvsanalyticrubricformeasuringclinicalperformancelevelsinmedicalstudents AT imsunju holisticrubricvsanalyticrubricformeasuringclinicalperformancelevelsinmedicalstudents AT kambeesung holisticrubricvsanalyticrubricformeasuringclinicalperformancelevelsinmedicalstudents AT baeksunyong holisticrubricvsanalyticrubricformeasuringclinicalperformancelevelsinmedicalstudents |