Cargando…

Ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke

BACKGROUND: Adequate reporting of ethics-related research methods promotes convergence on best ethics practices. In physical therapy, studies on ethics reporting are limited to few aspects, and none focuses on stroke research. Our objectives were to investigate the reporting of multiple ethics-relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrarello, Francesco, Viligiardi, Matteo, Di Bari, Mauro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29992047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-018-0049-9
_version_ 1783329468420456448
author Ferrarello, Francesco
Viligiardi, Matteo
Di Bari, Mauro
author_facet Ferrarello, Francesco
Viligiardi, Matteo
Di Bari, Mauro
author_sort Ferrarello, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adequate reporting of ethics-related research methods promotes convergence on best ethics practices. In physical therapy, studies on ethics reporting are limited to few aspects, and none focuses on stroke research. Our objectives were to investigate the reporting of multiple ethics-related features and its variation over time, and the characteristics of the studies associated with ethics reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of physical therapy interventions after stroke. METHODS: A random sample of RCTs published in the years 2004, 2009 and 2014, was extracted from the PubMed database, regardless of the publishing journal. For each trial we investigated year of publication, trial registration, sample size, stroke subtype, phase of the disease, setting, interventions and dosing, outcome measures, outcome of the study, PEDro score and 5-year impact factor of the publishing journal. Reporting of ethics-related issues was analyzed. Differences between groups were examined. Multiple regression was used to evaluate the relationship between ethics-related issues reporting and some studies’ characteristics. RESULTS: Eighty studies were reviewed. Groups differed in the proportion of registered trials (p = .009), 5-year impact factor (p = .011), assessment of cognitive capacity (p = .049), declaration about conflict of interest (p < .001), and number of ethics-related issues reported (p = .009). The proportion of issues reported ranged from 92.5% (consent obtaining) to 0% (eventual follow up care). Post-hoc comparisons showed significantly greater reporting of ethics issues in trials published in the year 2014 compared to 2004 (p = .014, 95%CI = 0.40/4.26). Year of publication and PEDro score were significant predictors of adequate reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Authors, editors, and reviewers should be more rigorous and demanding about the reporting of ethic-related methods in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5989458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59894582018-07-10 Ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke Ferrarello, Francesco Viligiardi, Matteo Di Bari, Mauro Arch Physiother Research Article BACKGROUND: Adequate reporting of ethics-related research methods promotes convergence on best ethics practices. In physical therapy, studies on ethics reporting are limited to few aspects, and none focuses on stroke research. Our objectives were to investigate the reporting of multiple ethics-related features and its variation over time, and the characteristics of the studies associated with ethics reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of physical therapy interventions after stroke. METHODS: A random sample of RCTs published in the years 2004, 2009 and 2014, was extracted from the PubMed database, regardless of the publishing journal. For each trial we investigated year of publication, trial registration, sample size, stroke subtype, phase of the disease, setting, interventions and dosing, outcome measures, outcome of the study, PEDro score and 5-year impact factor of the publishing journal. Reporting of ethics-related issues was analyzed. Differences between groups were examined. Multiple regression was used to evaluate the relationship between ethics-related issues reporting and some studies’ characteristics. RESULTS: Eighty studies were reviewed. Groups differed in the proportion of registered trials (p = .009), 5-year impact factor (p = .011), assessment of cognitive capacity (p = .049), declaration about conflict of interest (p < .001), and number of ethics-related issues reported (p = .009). The proportion of issues reported ranged from 92.5% (consent obtaining) to 0% (eventual follow up care). Post-hoc comparisons showed significantly greater reporting of ethics issues in trials published in the year 2014 compared to 2004 (p = .014, 95%CI = 0.40/4.26). Year of publication and PEDro score were significant predictors of adequate reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Authors, editors, and reviewers should be more rigorous and demanding about the reporting of ethic-related methods in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke. BioMed Central 2018-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5989458/ /pubmed/29992047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-018-0049-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferrarello, Francesco
Viligiardi, Matteo
Di Bari, Mauro
Ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke
title Ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke
title_full Ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke
title_fullStr Ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke
title_full_unstemmed Ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke
title_short Ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke
title_sort ethics reporting practices in randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions after stroke
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29992047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-018-0049-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrarellofrancesco ethicsreportingpracticesinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofphysicaltherapyinterventionsafterstroke
AT viligiardimatteo ethicsreportingpracticesinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofphysicaltherapyinterventionsafterstroke
AT dibarimauro ethicsreportingpracticesinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofphysicaltherapyinterventionsafterstroke