Cargando…
Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure
BACKGROUND: Quantifying antibiotic use is an essential element of antibiotic stewardship since it allows comparison between different settings and time windows, and measurement of the impact of interventions. However, quantity metrics (QMs) and methods have not been standardized. OBJECTIVES: To prop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29878222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky118 |
_version_ | 1783329497149341696 |
---|---|
author | Stanić Benić, Mirjana Milanič, Romina Monnier, Annelie A Gyssens, Inge C Adriaenssens, Niels Versporten, Ann Zanichelli, Veronica Le Maréchal, Marion Huttner, Benedikt Tebano, Gianpiero Hulscher, Marlies E Pulcini, Céline Schouten, Jeroen Vlahović-Palčevski, Vera |
author_facet | Stanić Benić, Mirjana Milanič, Romina Monnier, Annelie A Gyssens, Inge C Adriaenssens, Niels Versporten, Ann Zanichelli, Veronica Le Maréchal, Marion Huttner, Benedikt Tebano, Gianpiero Hulscher, Marlies E Pulcini, Céline Schouten, Jeroen Vlahović-Palčevski, Vera |
author_sort | Stanić Benić, Mirjana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Quantifying antibiotic use is an essential element of antibiotic stewardship since it allows comparison between different settings and time windows, and measurement of the impact of interventions. However, quantity metrics (QMs) and methods have not been standardized. OBJECTIVES: To propose a set of QMs for antibiotic use in inpatients (IQMs) that are accepted globally by professionals in a range of disciplines. The study was conducted within the Driving Reinvestment in Research and Development and Responsible Antibiotic Use (DRIVE-AB) project. METHODS: A systematic literature review using MEDLINE identified articles on measuring inpatient antibiotic use, published up to 29 January 2015. A consensually selected list of national and international web sites was screened for additional IQMs. IQMs were classified according to the type of numerator used and presented to a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders. A RAND-modified Delphi consensus procedure, which consisted of two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting, was performed. RESULTS: The systematic literature review and web site search identified 168 eligible articles from which an initial list of 20 IQMs, composed of 20 different numerators and associated denominators was developed. The consensus procedure resulted in a final set of 12 IQMs. Among this final set, DDDs per 100(0) patient-days and days of therapy per patient-days were most frequently found in the review. The panel recommended that antibiotic use should be expressed in at least two metrics simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Our consensus procedure identified a set of IQMs that we propose as an evidence-based global standard. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5989607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59896072018-06-12 Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure Stanić Benić, Mirjana Milanič, Romina Monnier, Annelie A Gyssens, Inge C Adriaenssens, Niels Versporten, Ann Zanichelli, Veronica Le Maréchal, Marion Huttner, Benedikt Tebano, Gianpiero Hulscher, Marlies E Pulcini, Céline Schouten, Jeroen Vlahović-Palčevski, Vera J Antimicrob Chemother Supplement Papers BACKGROUND: Quantifying antibiotic use is an essential element of antibiotic stewardship since it allows comparison between different settings and time windows, and measurement of the impact of interventions. However, quantity metrics (QMs) and methods have not been standardized. OBJECTIVES: To propose a set of QMs for antibiotic use in inpatients (IQMs) that are accepted globally by professionals in a range of disciplines. The study was conducted within the Driving Reinvestment in Research and Development and Responsible Antibiotic Use (DRIVE-AB) project. METHODS: A systematic literature review using MEDLINE identified articles on measuring inpatient antibiotic use, published up to 29 January 2015. A consensually selected list of national and international web sites was screened for additional IQMs. IQMs were classified according to the type of numerator used and presented to a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders. A RAND-modified Delphi consensus procedure, which consisted of two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting, was performed. RESULTS: The systematic literature review and web site search identified 168 eligible articles from which an initial list of 20 IQMs, composed of 20 different numerators and associated denominators was developed. The consensus procedure resulted in a final set of 12 IQMs. Among this final set, DDDs per 100(0) patient-days and days of therapy per patient-days were most frequently found in the review. The panel recommended that antibiotic use should be expressed in at least two metrics simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Our consensus procedure identified a set of IQMs that we propose as an evidence-based global standard. Oxford University Press 2018-06 2018-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5989607/ /pubmed/29878222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky118 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Supplement Papers Stanić Benić, Mirjana Milanič, Romina Monnier, Annelie A Gyssens, Inge C Adriaenssens, Niels Versporten, Ann Zanichelli, Veronica Le Maréchal, Marion Huttner, Benedikt Tebano, Gianpiero Hulscher, Marlies E Pulcini, Céline Schouten, Jeroen Vlahović-Palčevski, Vera Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure |
title | Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure |
title_full | Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure |
title_fullStr | Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure |
title_full_unstemmed | Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure |
title_short | Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure |
title_sort | metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure |
topic | Supplement Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29878222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stanicbenicmirjana metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT milanicromina metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT monnieranneliea metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT gyssensingec metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT adriaenssensniels metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT versportenann metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT zanichelliveronica metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT lemarechalmarion metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT huttnerbenedikt metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT tebanogianpiero metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT hulschermarliese metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT pulciniceline metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT schoutenjeroen metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT vlahovicpalcevskivera metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure AT metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure |