Cargando…

Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure

BACKGROUND: Quantifying antibiotic use is an essential element of antibiotic stewardship since it allows comparison between different settings and time windows, and measurement of the impact of interventions. However, quantity metrics (QMs) and methods have not been standardized. OBJECTIVES: To prop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanić Benić, Mirjana, Milanič, Romina, Monnier, Annelie A, Gyssens, Inge C, Adriaenssens, Niels, Versporten, Ann, Zanichelli, Veronica, Le Maréchal, Marion, Huttner, Benedikt, Tebano, Gianpiero, Hulscher, Marlies E, Pulcini, Céline, Schouten, Jeroen, Vlahović-Palčevski, Vera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29878222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky118
_version_ 1783329497149341696
author Stanić Benić, Mirjana
Milanič, Romina
Monnier, Annelie A
Gyssens, Inge C
Adriaenssens, Niels
Versporten, Ann
Zanichelli, Veronica
Le Maréchal, Marion
Huttner, Benedikt
Tebano, Gianpiero
Hulscher, Marlies E
Pulcini, Céline
Schouten, Jeroen
Vlahović-Palčevski, Vera
author_facet Stanić Benić, Mirjana
Milanič, Romina
Monnier, Annelie A
Gyssens, Inge C
Adriaenssens, Niels
Versporten, Ann
Zanichelli, Veronica
Le Maréchal, Marion
Huttner, Benedikt
Tebano, Gianpiero
Hulscher, Marlies E
Pulcini, Céline
Schouten, Jeroen
Vlahović-Palčevski, Vera
author_sort Stanić Benić, Mirjana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantifying antibiotic use is an essential element of antibiotic stewardship since it allows comparison between different settings and time windows, and measurement of the impact of interventions. However, quantity metrics (QMs) and methods have not been standardized. OBJECTIVES: To propose a set of QMs for antibiotic use in inpatients (IQMs) that are accepted globally by professionals in a range of disciplines. The study was conducted within the Driving Reinvestment in Research and Development and Responsible Antibiotic Use (DRIVE-AB) project. METHODS: A systematic literature review using MEDLINE identified articles on measuring inpatient antibiotic use, published up to 29 January 2015. A consensually selected list of national and international web sites was screened for additional IQMs. IQMs were classified according to the type of numerator used and presented to a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders. A RAND-modified Delphi consensus procedure, which consisted of two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting, was performed. RESULTS: The systematic literature review and web site search identified 168 eligible articles from which an initial list of 20 IQMs, composed of 20 different numerators and associated denominators was developed. The consensus procedure resulted in a final set of 12 IQMs. Among this final set, DDDs per 100(0) patient-days and days of therapy per patient-days were most frequently found in the review. The panel recommended that antibiotic use should be expressed in at least two metrics simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Our consensus procedure identified a set of IQMs that we propose as an evidence-based global standard.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5989607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59896072018-06-12 Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure Stanić Benić, Mirjana Milanič, Romina Monnier, Annelie A Gyssens, Inge C Adriaenssens, Niels Versporten, Ann Zanichelli, Veronica Le Maréchal, Marion Huttner, Benedikt Tebano, Gianpiero Hulscher, Marlies E Pulcini, Céline Schouten, Jeroen Vlahović-Palčevski, Vera J Antimicrob Chemother Supplement Papers BACKGROUND: Quantifying antibiotic use is an essential element of antibiotic stewardship since it allows comparison between different settings and time windows, and measurement of the impact of interventions. However, quantity metrics (QMs) and methods have not been standardized. OBJECTIVES: To propose a set of QMs for antibiotic use in inpatients (IQMs) that are accepted globally by professionals in a range of disciplines. The study was conducted within the Driving Reinvestment in Research and Development and Responsible Antibiotic Use (DRIVE-AB) project. METHODS: A systematic literature review using MEDLINE identified articles on measuring inpatient antibiotic use, published up to 29 January 2015. A consensually selected list of national and international web sites was screened for additional IQMs. IQMs were classified according to the type of numerator used and presented to a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders. A RAND-modified Delphi consensus procedure, which consisted of two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting, was performed. RESULTS: The systematic literature review and web site search identified 168 eligible articles from which an initial list of 20 IQMs, composed of 20 different numerators and associated denominators was developed. The consensus procedure resulted in a final set of 12 IQMs. Among this final set, DDDs per 100(0) patient-days and days of therapy per patient-days were most frequently found in the review. The panel recommended that antibiotic use should be expressed in at least two metrics simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Our consensus procedure identified a set of IQMs that we propose as an evidence-based global standard. Oxford University Press 2018-06 2018-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5989607/ /pubmed/29878222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky118 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Supplement Papers
Stanić Benić, Mirjana
Milanič, Romina
Monnier, Annelie A
Gyssens, Inge C
Adriaenssens, Niels
Versporten, Ann
Zanichelli, Veronica
Le Maréchal, Marion
Huttner, Benedikt
Tebano, Gianpiero
Hulscher, Marlies E
Pulcini, Céline
Schouten, Jeroen
Vlahović-Palčevski, Vera
Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure
title Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure
title_full Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure
title_fullStr Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure
title_full_unstemmed Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure
title_short Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure
title_sort metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure
topic Supplement Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29878222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky118
work_keys_str_mv AT stanicbenicmirjana metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT milanicromina metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT monnieranneliea metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT gyssensingec metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT adriaenssensniels metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT versportenann metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT zanichelliveronica metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT lemarechalmarion metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT huttnerbenedikt metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT tebanogianpiero metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT hulschermarliese metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT pulciniceline metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT schoutenjeroen metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT vlahovicpalcevskivera metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure
AT metricsforquantifyingantibioticuseinthehospitalsettingresultsfromasystematicreviewandinternationalmultidisciplinaryconsensusprocedure