Cargando…

Is Decellularized Porcine Small Intestine Sub-mucosa Patch Suitable for Aortic Arch Repair?

Introduction: We reviewed our experience with decellularized porcine small intestine sub-mucosa (DPSIS) patch, recently introduced for congenital heart defects. Materials and Methods: Between 10/2011 and 04/2016 a DPSIS patch was used in 51 patients, median age 1.1 months (5 days to 14.5 years), for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corno, Antonio F., Smith, Paul, Bezuska, Laurynas, Mimic, Branko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29900163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00149
_version_ 1783329501147561984
author Corno, Antonio F.
Smith, Paul
Bezuska, Laurynas
Mimic, Branko
author_facet Corno, Antonio F.
Smith, Paul
Bezuska, Laurynas
Mimic, Branko
author_sort Corno, Antonio F.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: We reviewed our experience with decellularized porcine small intestine sub-mucosa (DPSIS) patch, recently introduced for congenital heart defects. Materials and Methods: Between 10/2011 and 04/2016 a DPSIS patch was used in 51 patients, median age 1.1 months (5 days to 14.5 years), for aortic arch reconstruction (45/51 = 88.2%) or aortic coarctation repair (6/51 = 11.8%). All medical records were retrospectively reviewed, with primary endpoints interventional procedure (balloon dilatation) or surgery (DPSIS patch replacement) due to patch-related complications. Results: In a median follow-up time of 1.5 ± 1.1 years (0.6–2.3years) in 13/51 patients (25.5%) a re-intervention, percutaneous interventional procedure (5/51 = 9.8%) or re-operation (8/51 = 15.7%) was required because of obstruction in the correspondence of the DPSIS patch used to enlarge the aortic arch/isthmus, with median max velocity flow at Doppler interrogation of 4.0 ± 0.51 m/s. Two patients required surgery after failed interventional cardiology. The mean interval between DPSIS patch implantation and re-intervention (percutaneous procedure or re-operation) was 6 months (1–17 months). While there were 3 hospital deaths (3/51 = 5.9%) not related to the patch implantation, no early or late mortality occurred for the subsequent procedure required for DPSIS patch interventional cardiology or surgery. The median max velocity flow at Doppler interrogation through the aortic arch/isthmus for the patients who did not require interventional procedure or surgery was 1.7 ± 0.57 m/s. Conclusions: High incidence of re-interventions with DPSIS patch for aortic arch and/or coarctation forced us to use alternative materials (homografts and decellularized gluteraldehyde preserved bovine pericardial matrix).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5989640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59896402018-06-13 Is Decellularized Porcine Small Intestine Sub-mucosa Patch Suitable for Aortic Arch Repair? Corno, Antonio F. Smith, Paul Bezuska, Laurynas Mimic, Branko Front Pediatr Pediatrics Introduction: We reviewed our experience with decellularized porcine small intestine sub-mucosa (DPSIS) patch, recently introduced for congenital heart defects. Materials and Methods: Between 10/2011 and 04/2016 a DPSIS patch was used in 51 patients, median age 1.1 months (5 days to 14.5 years), for aortic arch reconstruction (45/51 = 88.2%) or aortic coarctation repair (6/51 = 11.8%). All medical records were retrospectively reviewed, with primary endpoints interventional procedure (balloon dilatation) or surgery (DPSIS patch replacement) due to patch-related complications. Results: In a median follow-up time of 1.5 ± 1.1 years (0.6–2.3years) in 13/51 patients (25.5%) a re-intervention, percutaneous interventional procedure (5/51 = 9.8%) or re-operation (8/51 = 15.7%) was required because of obstruction in the correspondence of the DPSIS patch used to enlarge the aortic arch/isthmus, with median max velocity flow at Doppler interrogation of 4.0 ± 0.51 m/s. Two patients required surgery after failed interventional cardiology. The mean interval between DPSIS patch implantation and re-intervention (percutaneous procedure or re-operation) was 6 months (1–17 months). While there were 3 hospital deaths (3/51 = 5.9%) not related to the patch implantation, no early or late mortality occurred for the subsequent procedure required for DPSIS patch interventional cardiology or surgery. The median max velocity flow at Doppler interrogation through the aortic arch/isthmus for the patients who did not require interventional procedure or surgery was 1.7 ± 0.57 m/s. Conclusions: High incidence of re-interventions with DPSIS patch for aortic arch and/or coarctation forced us to use alternative materials (homografts and decellularized gluteraldehyde preserved bovine pericardial matrix). Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5989640/ /pubmed/29900163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00149 Text en Copyright © 2018 Corno, Smith, Bezuska and Mimic. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Corno, Antonio F.
Smith, Paul
Bezuska, Laurynas
Mimic, Branko
Is Decellularized Porcine Small Intestine Sub-mucosa Patch Suitable for Aortic Arch Repair?
title Is Decellularized Porcine Small Intestine Sub-mucosa Patch Suitable for Aortic Arch Repair?
title_full Is Decellularized Porcine Small Intestine Sub-mucosa Patch Suitable for Aortic Arch Repair?
title_fullStr Is Decellularized Porcine Small Intestine Sub-mucosa Patch Suitable for Aortic Arch Repair?
title_full_unstemmed Is Decellularized Porcine Small Intestine Sub-mucosa Patch Suitable for Aortic Arch Repair?
title_short Is Decellularized Porcine Small Intestine Sub-mucosa Patch Suitable for Aortic Arch Repair?
title_sort is decellularized porcine small intestine sub-mucosa patch suitable for aortic arch repair?
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29900163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00149
work_keys_str_mv AT cornoantoniof isdecellularizedporcinesmallintestinesubmucosapatchsuitableforaorticarchrepair
AT smithpaul isdecellularizedporcinesmallintestinesubmucosapatchsuitableforaorticarchrepair
AT bezuskalaurynas isdecellularizedporcinesmallintestinesubmucosapatchsuitableforaorticarchrepair
AT mimicbranko isdecellularizedporcinesmallintestinesubmucosapatchsuitableforaorticarchrepair