Cargando…
The unattainable criteria for new infant vaccines
Background. In 2013, the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) opted against adding meningococcal vaccines to the infant schedule due to poor cost-effectiveness. This raises a policy question: if meningococcal disease is too rare to justify routine vaccination, are there other vacci...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28509601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1328334 |
_version_ | 1783329537343356928 |
---|---|
author | Gill, Christopher J. Hodsdon, Lauren Santosham, Mathuram O'Brien, Katherine L. |
author_facet | Gill, Christopher J. Hodsdon, Lauren Santosham, Mathuram O'Brien, Katherine L. |
author_sort | Gill, Christopher J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. In 2013, the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) opted against adding meningococcal vaccines to the infant schedule due to poor cost-effectiveness. This raises a policy question: if meningococcal disease is too rare to justify routine vaccination, are there other vaccine-preventable causes of US infant deaths that could be supported? Methods. We tabulated US infant deaths from 2009–2013 using the CDC WONDER database. These causes of death were then categorized into one of 3 categories: 1) vaccine-preventable using currently available interventions; 2) potentially vaccine-preventable within the next 10 years; and 3) not preventable. Results. From 19.8 million births (3.9 million/year), ∼122,000 infants died (0.62%). Of these, 181 (0.15% of all deaths) were preventable using currently available vaccines, while an additional 779 were categorized as potentially preventable in the next 10 y. By exclusion, 121,040 (99.2%) were judged ‘not vaccine-preventable’. Meningococcal deaths contributed at most 0.03% of all infant deaths, but accounted for 17–34% of current vaccine-preventable deaths. Conclusions. The low number of vaccine-preventable deaths in the US makes it increasingly difficult to justify the introduction of any new infant vaccines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5989892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59898922018-06-07 The unattainable criteria for new infant vaccines Gill, Christopher J. Hodsdon, Lauren Santosham, Mathuram O'Brien, Katherine L. Hum Vaccin Immunother Commentary Background. In 2013, the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) opted against adding meningococcal vaccines to the infant schedule due to poor cost-effectiveness. This raises a policy question: if meningococcal disease is too rare to justify routine vaccination, are there other vaccine-preventable causes of US infant deaths that could be supported? Methods. We tabulated US infant deaths from 2009–2013 using the CDC WONDER database. These causes of death were then categorized into one of 3 categories: 1) vaccine-preventable using currently available interventions; 2) potentially vaccine-preventable within the next 10 years; and 3) not preventable. Results. From 19.8 million births (3.9 million/year), ∼122,000 infants died (0.62%). Of these, 181 (0.15% of all deaths) were preventable using currently available vaccines, while an additional 779 were categorized as potentially preventable in the next 10 y. By exclusion, 121,040 (99.2%) were judged ‘not vaccine-preventable’. Meningococcal deaths contributed at most 0.03% of all infant deaths, but accounted for 17–34% of current vaccine-preventable deaths. Conclusions. The low number of vaccine-preventable deaths in the US makes it increasingly difficult to justify the introduction of any new infant vaccines. Taylor & Francis 2017-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5989892/ /pubmed/28509601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1328334 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor and Francis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Gill, Christopher J. Hodsdon, Lauren Santosham, Mathuram O'Brien, Katherine L. The unattainable criteria for new infant vaccines |
title | The unattainable criteria for new infant vaccines |
title_full | The unattainable criteria for new infant vaccines |
title_fullStr | The unattainable criteria for new infant vaccines |
title_full_unstemmed | The unattainable criteria for new infant vaccines |
title_short | The unattainable criteria for new infant vaccines |
title_sort | unattainable criteria for new infant vaccines |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28509601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1328334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillchristopherj theunattainablecriteriafornewinfantvaccines AT hodsdonlauren theunattainablecriteriafornewinfantvaccines AT santoshammathuram theunattainablecriteriafornewinfantvaccines AT obrienkatherinel theunattainablecriteriafornewinfantvaccines AT gillchristopherj unattainablecriteriafornewinfantvaccines AT hodsdonlauren unattainablecriteriafornewinfantvaccines AT santoshammathuram unattainablecriteriafornewinfantvaccines AT obrienkatherinel unattainablecriteriafornewinfantvaccines |