Cargando…

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are widely used to inform the development of protocols for clinical management. Previous work has demonstrated that the quality of CPGs varies widely. This systematic review aimed to determine the quality of CPGs in kidney transplantation in the UK. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Donoghue, K. J. M., Reed, R. D., Knight, S. R., O'Callaghan, J. M., Ayaz‐Shah, A. A., Hassan, S., Morris, P. J., Pengel, L. H. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.17
_version_ 1783329542639714304
author O'Donoghue, K. J. M.
Reed, R. D.
Knight, S. R.
O'Callaghan, J. M.
Ayaz‐Shah, A. A.
Hassan, S.
Morris, P. J.
Pengel, L. H. M.
author_facet O'Donoghue, K. J. M.
Reed, R. D.
Knight, S. R.
O'Callaghan, J. M.
Ayaz‐Shah, A. A.
Hassan, S.
Morris, P. J.
Pengel, L. H. M.
author_sort O'Donoghue, K. J. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are widely used to inform the development of protocols for clinical management. Previous work has demonstrated that the quality of CPGs varies widely. This systematic review aimed to determine the quality of CPGs in kidney transplantation in the UK. METHODS: CPGs in kidney transplantation published between 2010 and 2017 were identified through searches of MEDLINE, NHS NICE Evidence, and websites of relevant UK societies. Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool, three appraisers rated the quality of CPGs across six domains, the overall quality of each CPG, and whether it should be recommended for future use. Domain scores were calculated, and inter‐rater reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was reported. RESULTS: Thirteen CPGs met the inclusion criteria. The domain ‘clarity of presentation’ scored highest, followed closely by ‘scope and purpose’. The poorest scoring domains were ‘applicability’ and ‘editorial independence’. Editorial independence also had the widest range of scores. Of the 13 CPGs, one was not recommended for future use, seven were recommended for use with modifications, and five for future use with no need for modification. Mean overall CPG quality was 5 (range 3–6) of a maximum score of 7, and mean inter‐rater reliability was substantial with an ICC of 0·71. CONCLUSION: UK CPGs scored satisfactorily, although with wide variation in how well each domain scored both within and across CPGs. The quality of UK CPGs can still be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5989947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59899472018-06-27 Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation O'Donoghue, K. J. M. Reed, R. D. Knight, S. R. O'Callaghan, J. M. Ayaz‐Shah, A. A. Hassan, S. Morris, P. J. Pengel, L. H. M. BJS Open Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are widely used to inform the development of protocols for clinical management. Previous work has demonstrated that the quality of CPGs varies widely. This systematic review aimed to determine the quality of CPGs in kidney transplantation in the UK. METHODS: CPGs in kidney transplantation published between 2010 and 2017 were identified through searches of MEDLINE, NHS NICE Evidence, and websites of relevant UK societies. Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool, three appraisers rated the quality of CPGs across six domains, the overall quality of each CPG, and whether it should be recommended for future use. Domain scores were calculated, and inter‐rater reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was reported. RESULTS: Thirteen CPGs met the inclusion criteria. The domain ‘clarity of presentation’ scored highest, followed closely by ‘scope and purpose’. The poorest scoring domains were ‘applicability’ and ‘editorial independence’. Editorial independence also had the widest range of scores. Of the 13 CPGs, one was not recommended for future use, seven were recommended for use with modifications, and five for future use with no need for modification. Mean overall CPG quality was 5 (range 3–6) of a maximum score of 7, and mean inter‐rater reliability was substantial with an ICC of 0·71. CONCLUSION: UK CPGs scored satisfactorily, although with wide variation in how well each domain scored both within and across CPGs. The quality of UK CPGs can still be improved. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5989947/ /pubmed/29951611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.17 Text en © 2017 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
O'Donoghue, K. J. M.
Reed, R. D.
Knight, S. R.
O'Callaghan, J. M.
Ayaz‐Shah, A. A.
Hassan, S.
Morris, P. J.
Pengel, L. H. M.
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation
title Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation
title_full Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation
title_fullStr Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation
title_short Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation
title_sort systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in kidney transplantation
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.17
work_keys_str_mv AT odonoghuekjm systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinkidneytransplantation
AT reedrd systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinkidneytransplantation
AT knightsr systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinkidneytransplantation
AT ocallaghanjm systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinkidneytransplantation
AT ayazshahaa systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinkidneytransplantation
AT hassans systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinkidneytransplantation
AT morrispj systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinkidneytransplantation
AT pengellhm systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinkidneytransplantation