Cargando…

Systematic review of the cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical‐site infection

BACKGROUND: Surgical‐site infections (SSIs) increase the length of hospital admission and costs. SSI prevention guidelines include preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. This review assessed the reporting quality and cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotics used to prevent SSI. METHODS: PubMed,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allen, J., David, M., Veerman, J. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.45
_version_ 1783329547091968000
author Allen, J.
David, M.
Veerman, J. L.
author_facet Allen, J.
David, M.
Veerman, J. L.
author_sort Allen, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical‐site infections (SSIs) increase the length of hospital admission and costs. SSI prevention guidelines include preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. This review assessed the reporting quality and cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotics used to prevent SSI. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Index of Economic Articles (EconLit), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect (including the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database) and Cochrane Central databases were searched systematically from 1970 to 2017 for articles that included costs, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and SSI. Included were RCTs and quasi‐experimental studies conducted in Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries with participants aged at least 18 years and published in English. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, with inter‐rater reliability determined by Cohen's κ statistic. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation and Reporting Standards (CHEERS) and modified Drummond checklists were used to assess reporting and economic quality. Study outcomes and characteristics were extracted, and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios were calculated, with costs adjusted to euros (2016) (€1 = US $1·25; £1 sterling = €1·28). RESULTS: Twelve studies published between 1988 and 2014 were included from 646 records identified; nine were RCTs, two were nested within RCTs and one was a retrospective chart review. Study quality was highest in the nested studies. Cephalosporins (first, second and third generation) were the most frequent prophylactic interventions. Eleven studies demonstrated clinically effective interventions; ten were cost‐effective (the intervention was dominant); in one the intervention was dominated by the control; and in one the intervention was more effective and more expensive than the control. CONCLUSION: Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis does reduce SSI, costs to hospitals and health providers, but the reporting of economic methods in RCTs is not standardized. Routinely nesting economic methods in RCTs would improve economic evaluations and ensure appropriate selection of prophylactic antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5989978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59899782018-06-27 Systematic review of the cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical‐site infection Allen, J. David, M. Veerman, J. L. BJS Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Surgical‐site infections (SSIs) increase the length of hospital admission and costs. SSI prevention guidelines include preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. This review assessed the reporting quality and cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotics used to prevent SSI. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Index of Economic Articles (EconLit), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect (including the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database) and Cochrane Central databases were searched systematically from 1970 to 2017 for articles that included costs, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and SSI. Included were RCTs and quasi‐experimental studies conducted in Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries with participants aged at least 18 years and published in English. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, with inter‐rater reliability determined by Cohen's κ statistic. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation and Reporting Standards (CHEERS) and modified Drummond checklists were used to assess reporting and economic quality. Study outcomes and characteristics were extracted, and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios were calculated, with costs adjusted to euros (2016) (€1 = US $1·25; £1 sterling = €1·28). RESULTS: Twelve studies published between 1988 and 2014 were included from 646 records identified; nine were RCTs, two were nested within RCTs and one was a retrospective chart review. Study quality was highest in the nested studies. Cephalosporins (first, second and third generation) were the most frequent prophylactic interventions. Eleven studies demonstrated clinically effective interventions; ten were cost‐effective (the intervention was dominant); in one the intervention was dominated by the control; and in one the intervention was more effective and more expensive than the control. CONCLUSION: Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis does reduce SSI, costs to hospitals and health providers, but the reporting of economic methods in RCTs is not standardized. Routinely nesting economic methods in RCTs would improve economic evaluations and ensure appropriate selection of prophylactic antibiotics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5989978/ /pubmed/29951632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.45 Text en © 2018 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Allen, J.
David, M.
Veerman, J. L.
Systematic review of the cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical‐site infection
title Systematic review of the cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical‐site infection
title_full Systematic review of the cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical‐site infection
title_fullStr Systematic review of the cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical‐site infection
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical‐site infection
title_short Systematic review of the cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical‐site infection
title_sort systematic review of the cost‐effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical‐site infection
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.45
work_keys_str_mv AT allenj systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofpreoperativeantibioticprophylaxisinreducingsurgicalsiteinfection
AT davidm systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofpreoperativeantibioticprophylaxisinreducingsurgicalsiteinfection
AT veermanjl systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessofpreoperativeantibioticprophylaxisinreducingsurgicalsiteinfection