Cargando…

Development of the Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT)

BACKGROUND: A Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT) was developed and tested in a multicentre observational pilot study. The tool enables monitoring and benchmarking perioperative safety performance across departments and hospitals, covering international patient safety goals. METHODS: Nin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J., Calsbeek, H., Emond, Y. J., Damen, J., Meijerink, W. J. H. J., Hofland, J., Wolff, A. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.44
_version_ 1783329548010520576
author Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J.
Calsbeek, H.
Emond, Y. J.
Damen, J.
Meijerink, W. J. H. J.
Hofland, J.
Wolff, A. P.
author_facet Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J.
Calsbeek, H.
Emond, Y. J.
Damen, J.
Meijerink, W. J. H. J.
Hofland, J.
Wolff, A. P.
author_sort Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT) was developed and tested in a multicentre observational pilot study. The tool enables monitoring and benchmarking perioperative safety performance across departments and hospitals, covering international patient safety goals. METHODS: Nineteen perioperative patient safety observation topics were selected from Dutch perioperative patient safety guidelines, which also cover international patient safety goals. All items that measured these selected topics were then extracted from available local observation checklists of the participating hospitals. Experts individually prioritized the best measurement items per topic in an initial written Delphi round. The second (face to face) Delphi round resulted in consensus on the content of SPOT, after which the measurable elements (MEs) per topic were defined. Finally, the tool was piloted in eight hospitals for measurability, applicability, improvement potential, discriminatory capacity and feasibility. RESULTS: The pilot test showed good measurability for all 19 patient safety topics (range of 8–291 MEs among topics), with good applicability (median 97 (range 11·8–100) per cent). The overall improvement potential appeared to be good (median 89 (range 72·5–100) per cent), and at topic level the tool showed good discriminatory capacity (variation 27·5 per cent, range in compliance 72·5–100 per cent). Overall scores showed relatively little variation between the participating hospitals (variation 13 per cent, range in compliance 83–96 per cent). All eight auditors considered SPOT a straightforward and easy‐to‐use tracer tool. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive tool to measure safety of care was developed and validated using a systematic, stepwise method, enabling hospitals to monitor, benchmark and improve perioperative safety performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5989983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59899832018-06-27 Development of the Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT) Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J. Calsbeek, H. Emond, Y. J. Damen, J. Meijerink, W. J. H. J. Hofland, J. Wolff, A. P. BJS Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: A Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT) was developed and tested in a multicentre observational pilot study. The tool enables monitoring and benchmarking perioperative safety performance across departments and hospitals, covering international patient safety goals. METHODS: Nineteen perioperative patient safety observation topics were selected from Dutch perioperative patient safety guidelines, which also cover international patient safety goals. All items that measured these selected topics were then extracted from available local observation checklists of the participating hospitals. Experts individually prioritized the best measurement items per topic in an initial written Delphi round. The second (face to face) Delphi round resulted in consensus on the content of SPOT, after which the measurable elements (MEs) per topic were defined. Finally, the tool was piloted in eight hospitals for measurability, applicability, improvement potential, discriminatory capacity and feasibility. RESULTS: The pilot test showed good measurability for all 19 patient safety topics (range of 8–291 MEs among topics), with good applicability (median 97 (range 11·8–100) per cent). The overall improvement potential appeared to be good (median 89 (range 72·5–100) per cent), and at topic level the tool showed good discriminatory capacity (variation 27·5 per cent, range in compliance 72·5–100 per cent). Overall scores showed relatively little variation between the participating hospitals (variation 13 per cent, range in compliance 83–96 per cent). All eight auditors considered SPOT a straightforward and easy‐to‐use tracer tool. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive tool to measure safety of care was developed and validated using a systematic, stepwise method, enabling hospitals to monitor, benchmark and improve perioperative safety performance. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5989983/ /pubmed/29951635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.44 Text en © 2018 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J.
Calsbeek, H.
Emond, Y. J.
Damen, J.
Meijerink, W. J. H. J.
Hofland, J.
Wolff, A. P.
Development of the Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT)
title Development of the Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT)
title_full Development of the Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT)
title_fullStr Development of the Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT)
title_full_unstemmed Development of the Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT)
title_short Development of the Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT)
title_sort development of the surgical patient safety observation tool (spot)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.44
work_keys_str_mv AT heideveldchevalkingaj developmentofthesurgicalpatientsafetyobservationtoolspot
AT calsbeekh developmentofthesurgicalpatientsafetyobservationtoolspot
AT emondyj developmentofthesurgicalpatientsafetyobservationtoolspot
AT damenj developmentofthesurgicalpatientsafetyobservationtoolspot
AT meijerinkwjhj developmentofthesurgicalpatientsafetyobservationtoolspot
AT hoflandj developmentofthesurgicalpatientsafetyobservationtoolspot
AT wolffap developmentofthesurgicalpatientsafetyobservationtoolspot